Volcanological applications of unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS): Developments, strategies, and future challenges

Mike R. James; Brett B Carr; Fiona D’Arcy; Angela K. Diefenbach; Hannah R. Dietterich; Alessandro Fornaciai; Einat Lev; Emma J Liu; David C. Pieri; Mel Rodgers; Benoit Smets; Akihiko Terada; Felix W von Aulock; Thomas R. Walter; Kieran T Wood; Edgar U Zorn

doi:10.30909/vol.03.01.67114

USGS · 70218230

Volcanological applications of unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS): Developments, strategies, and future challenges

Mike R. James·Brett B Carr·Fiona D’Arcy·Angela K. Diefenbach·Hannah R. Dietterich·Alessandro Fornaciai·Einat Lev·Emma J Liu·David C. Pieri·Mel Rodgers·Benoit Smets·Akihiko Terada·Felix W von Aulock·Thomas R. Walter·Kieran T Wood·Edgar U Zorn

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) are developing into fundamental tools for tackling the grand challenges in volcanology; here, we review the systems used and their diverse applications. UAS can typically provide image and topographic data at two orders of magnitude better spatial resolution than space-based remote sensing, and close-range observations at temporal resolutions down to those of video frame rates. Responsive deployments facilitate dense time-series measurements, unique opportunities for geophysical surveys, sample collection from hostile environments such as volcanic plumes and crater lakes, and emergency deployment of ground-based sensors (and robots) into hazardous regions. UAS have already been used to support hazard management and decision-makers during eruptive crises. As technologies advance, increased system capabilities, autonomy and availability, supported by more diverse and lighter-weight sensors, will offer unparalleled potential for hazard monitoring. UAS are expected to provide opportunities for pivotal advances in our understanding of complex physical and chemical volcanic processes.

Explore related subjects

Volcanica Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Mike R. James, Brett B Carr, Fiona D’Arcy, Angela K. Diefenbach, Hannah R. Dietterich, Alessandro Fornaciai, Einat Lev, Emma J Liu, David C. Pieri, Mel Rodgers, Benoit Smets, Akihiko Terada, Felix W von Aulock, Thomas R. Walter, Kieran T Wood, Edgar U Zorn. 2020-04-09. Volcanological applications of unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS): Developments, strategies, and future challenges. https://doi.org/10.30909/vol.03.01.67114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Relating glassy rind thicknesses to ambient air temperatures at the Lost Jim flow field in the Imuruk Lake volcanic field, Alaska

The Lost Jim flow field, in the Imuruk Lake volcanic field, Alaska, extends west ~34 km from a single vent, crossing subarctic tundra and currently touches several lakes and streams. The weighted mean of five 36Cl cosmogenic exposure ages from the Lost Jim pāhoehoe flow is 7.73 ± 0.37 ka, indicating this eruption occurred substantially after the eruption of the underlying Camille flow, which was emplaced at 39.7 ± 1.3 ka. Paleoclimate records indicate the period when the Lost Jim flow field was emplaced was after deglaciation, and the climate was similar to today. We propose that the emplacement of lava in these cold subarctic conditions can lead to faster cooling of the lava surface compared to lava emplaced in warmer locations such as mid- latitude cold deserts. Glass abundance in the outermost rinds at the Lost Jim flow field was on average 74 % with 6.4 mm thick rims, compared to 60 % with 2.9 mm rims for cold mid-latitude desert samples. We interpret increased glass content as a proxy for rapid cooling likely occurring partly during winter. Glassiness values varied less across vent, margin, and mid-flow locations when compared to the mid-latitude flows suggesting the Lost Jim flow field was broadly impacted by the subarctic climate as opposed to responding to local microclimates. Our results indicate that lava glassiness may be a useful environmental indicator of cooler (in this case subarctic) conditions.

Alaska↗

USGS2026

Effects of external water on volcanic column height and collapse

Volcanic plumes are important because they spread volcanic material, can impact climate, and pose hazards to aviation. Among eruption processes, column collapse is arguably the most consequential in terms of direct impacts, as it marks the onset of ground-hugging pyroclastic density currents that pose the greatest immediate threat to life and infrastructure. This study inves- tigates how external water, such as is incorporated during subaqueous eruptions, affects the critical condition (including mass eruption rate, temperature, and gas fraction) at which column collapse occurs in the atmosphere, referred to as “the column collapse condition”. We use the 1-D plume model, Plumeria , to explore how variations in external water (0–60 wt.%), vent exit velocity (75–125 m s −1 ), and initial magma temperature (700–1100 °C) affect the column collapse condition. We find that the occurrence of column collapse is highly sensitive to the amount of external water. Small amounts of external water (⪅ 25 wt.%) suppress column collapse, whereas higher amounts of water encourage collapse. Using more than 150,000 simulations, we map out the highly non-linear shape of the column collapse condition as a function of mass eruption rates and external water contents. The Richardson number, the ratio of buoyancy to shear forces, offers a useful framework for defining the column collapse condition for eruptions involving external water. This work enhances our understanding of how external water ingestion affects volcanic plume dynamics, including height and column collapse conditions. Recent shallow submarine eruptions that produced very tall atmospheric plumes and partial column collapse (e.g. the 2021 Fukutoku-Oka-no-Ba eruption in Japan and the 2022 Hunga eruption in Tonga) demonstrate the importance of understanding how external water influences the collapse of eruption columns.

Volcanica↗

USGS2025

Case study of deep learning image segmentation for the purposes of rapid 2D petrographic analysis in volcanic rocks

Automation using deep learning methods is a useful alternative to manual methods of petrographic segmentation, but often requires user familiarity with coding and/or algorithms. We examine the Dragonfly TM program's deep learning tools for application by users with a variety of skill levels as a method for petrographic image segmentation. An image processing methodology, bimodal image stacking, was created for low-input-data, high-efficacy training of models which can then be applied to varied samples. Using backscatter electron images we show that the resulting model segmentations agree with manual segmentation total and modal crystallinity values within 5%, and calculated plagioclase crystal size distribution (CSD) values within 2σ, despite limitations in discriminating mafic phases. Model creation and training takes <24 hours, 1–3 hours of which are supervised, and the resultant model can then be applied to new uncharacterized samples in <15 minutes per image. This allows for non-experts to create and utilize deep learning models to segment images of variable brightness and texture, at low user-time cost and resulting in size and shape data which are within uncertainty of manual segmentation. While some limitations are noted (for example, sieve-textured phases may need manual correction, and different minerals with similar BSE intensity may not be resolved as separate phases), this methodology can be utilized for general application of models to wide ranges of volcanic crystalline and bubble textures, and to create a library of models for rapid petrological analysis during volcanic eruptions.

Alaska↗