Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70282824

Fault sources of the 2020 southern Puerto Rico seismic sequence and the regional tectonic structure

Abstract

The 2020 southwestern Puerto Rico seismic sequence occurred in an area not known for seismic activity and included multiple normal and strike‐slip focal mechanisms. The largest earthquake, M w 6.4, caused significant damage and permanent shoreline subsidence. The locations of the ruptured faults have been explored extensively using seismological and geodetic evidence, but no consensus has been reached. Here, we report the results of a high‐resolution seismic reflection survey that identified a north‐verging 20 km long curved normal fault spanning the upper reach of the Guayanilla canyon, which we call the Guayanilla Canyon fault. Part of the fault likely ruptured during the M w 6.4. The concave‐to‐the‐north fault bounds a south‐dipping ∼1 km deep asymmetric basin. This long‐lived structure, identified also on sediment isopach and magnetic anomaly maps, appears to control the formation of the Guayanilla canyon system, the only submarine drainage system in southern Puerto Rico, suggesting a relationship among seismic activity, geomorphology, and reef development. Our seismic reflection data do not support the existence of previously published major seismogenic faults in the area, such as the north‐northeast–south‐southwest Guayanilla fault zone, the Northern Boqueron Bay‐Punta Montalva fault, or a northwest–southeast strike‐slip fault, suggested to have ruptured as part of the M w 6.4 earthquake. We identified smaller faults in the survey area, some of which can be correlated with seafloor expressions, and/or with changes in sediment thickness and magnetic anomalies, and/or with moderate‐sized earthquakes. Multiple seismic images of Investigator fault, a prominent mid‐slope feature parallel to the south coast of Puerto Rico, show buried low‐angle thrusts and an abrupt change in the attitude of the overlying sediments, leading us to interpret this feature as the expression of a boundary between the now‐inactive upper accretionary prism of Muertos trough and a buried back‐arc basin that overlies the arc basement of Puerto Rico.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 17.84149708740165° to 18.57249542098407° latitude; -67.37915400134112° to -65.59975893150913° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Uri S. ten Brink, Claudia Flores, David S. Foster, Jose-Luis Granja-Bruña, Wayne E. Baldwin, Nicholas Harmon, Samuel J. Heller, Shuoshuo Han. 2026-06-16. Fault sources of the 2020 southern Puerto Rico seismic sequence and the regional tectonic structure. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250340

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Amploc: A complete Python workflow for amplitude-based locations

Amplitude‐based locations are well suited for characterizing long‐duration seismic sources that may migrate with time, such as debris flows, avalanches, rockfall, and volcanic tremor. Although amplitude‐based location methods have existed for decades, their adoption in real‐time monitoring systems remains limited. We present a complete Python‐based workflow that includes station corrections, amplitude‐based location algorithms, and interactive review tools that are appropriate for real‐time use. The algorithms themselves are not new; however, Amploc integrates several previously published methods into a unified operational framework. The workflow also introduces a browser‐based graphical interface that allows users to review real‐time location results using formats familiar to many observatories. By integrating calibration, location algorithms, and visualization tools, Amploc lowers the barrier to operational use of amplitude‐based locations and improves characterization of phenomena that inform hazard assessments such as long‐period earthquakes, volcanic tremor, and debris flows.

British Columbia, Oregon, Washington↗

Global seasonal microseism intensity and hemispheric asymmetry

Earth’s microseism wavefield dominates seismic background levels at periods between approximately 4 and 20 s, and reflects periodic and secular variations in ocean swell energy. Ocean wave energy couples to the seismic wavefield via distinct primary microseism and secondary microseism (PM and SM) source mechanisms, which are excited by basal swell tractions and seafloor pressure variations due to crossing seas, respectively. This study examines annual amplitude variations for the globally dominant PM (14–20 s) and SM (4–10 s) period bands. Annual harmonic variations are represented by four‐term Fourier series fits to vertical‐component seasonally smoothed acceleration time series from 73 stations in the Global Seismographic and GEOSCOPE networks with over 20 yr of recording and at least 75% data completeness. These annual periodic functions fit between 14%–95% (PM) and 22%–97% (SM) of signal variance. Station annual peak‐to‐peak variations range between 1.2–14.3 dB (PM) and 1.5–20.6 dB (SM). An asymmetry in microseism features exists between the Northern (NH) and Southern (SH) Hemispheres. High‐latitude NH stations show highly correlated PM and SM annual amplitude variations. This character dominates the wider extratropical NH but diminishes at tropical latitudes, and widespread relative PM–SM decorrelation is observed in the SH. These hemispheric characteristics reflect systematic differences in both extratropical storm activity and ocean wave state. Greater annual variation and seasonal predictability in the NH reflect the influence of the large continental landmasses that enhance both storm intensity seasonality and SM‐generating coastal wave reflection. Notable clusters of low PM–SM correlation stations are also observed in continental Antarctica due to seasonal sea ice influences, and in East Asia, reflecting unusual PM and SM source responses to South Asian monsoonal and tropical cyclone ocean wave influences.

Seismological Research Letters↗

Digitizer Suite: The Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory Digitizer Testing Suite

Laboratory testing of digitizers and seismometers helps ensure that prior to deployment the instrumentation can produce high quality data and is operating within specifications. In this work we detail the software package called: the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory (ASL) Digitizer Test Suite. This Java software package provides several algorithms to verify various performance parameters of digitizers commonly used for recording analog seismic instruments. The goal of these tests is not to be exhaustive, but to identify common failures that could compromise the integrity of seismic data being recorded on the digitizer. For example, Sandia National Laboratories (e.g., Slad and Merchant, 2018) routinely do comprehensive testing of digitizers for various monitoring missions. While these tests reports are valuable for comprehensively characterizing a recording system, it would be resource intensive to conduct such tests on every seismic recorder used in a network. We focus on tests that include ways to estimate the sensitivity, timing, self-noise, and clip-level of the digitizer, as well as the fidelity of the signal being recorded. The software is publicly available and provides a way for the community to verify the integrity of a digitizer using a minimum amount of outside equipment.

Seismological Research Letters↗