Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70265808

Salinas Valley integrated hydrologic and reservoir operations models, Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties, California

Abstract

The area surrounding the Salinas Valley groundwater basin in Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties of California is a highly productive agricultural area, contributes significantly to the local economy, and provides a substantial portion of vegetables and other agricultural commodities to the Nation. This region of California provides about half of the Nation’s lettuce, celery, broccoli, and spinach each year. Thus, this agricultural area provides significant volumes of agricultural products not just for California but the entire United States. Changes in population and increased agricultural development, which includes a shift toward more water-intensive crops, and climate variability, have put increasing demand on both surface water and groundwater resources in the valley. This has resulted in water management challenges in the Salinas Valley that are predominantly related to distribution of water supply throughout the basin. Where and when the water is present in the surface and subsurface does not coincide with where and when the water is needed. To deal with the distribution issue, historically water has been used conjunctively in the valley. Conjunctive use is a water management strategy that coordinates surface water and groundwater use to maximize water availability. Groundwater is used throughout the Salinas Valley to meet water demands when surface water supplies are insufficient. Availability of surface water is constrained by climate. Precipitation and streamflow vary seasonally and year to year. Although there are two reservoirs in the Salinas Valley to capture and store water during wet periods, the only conveyance of reservoir water to coastal agricultural areas is the Salinas River. Increasing demand on groundwater and surface water resources throughout the Salinas Valley has resulted in undesirable effects of unsustainable water use, such as surface water depletion, groundwater level declines, storage depletion in the principal aquifers, and seawater intrusion. To address these escalating issues, local communities, water management agencies, and groundwater sustainability agencies are evaluating how to sustainably manage both their surface water and groundwater resources. To meet water demands and reduce undesirable effects of unsustainable water use, continued conjunctive management of surface water and groundwater would ideally incorporate strategies to deal with increases in demand and a variable climate. To evaluate the challenging water management issues in the Salinas Valley, the U.S. Geological Survey, Monterey County Water Resource Agency, and the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency developed a comprehensive suite of models that represent the Salinas Valley Hydrogeologic system called the Salinas Valley System Model. The Salinas Valley Geologic Framework was developed to characterize the subsurface using various topographic and geologic data sources, including information on hydrogeologic units, their surfaces and extents, geologic structures, lithology, and elevations from borehole data and cross sections, as well as details on faults and existing models. The Salinas Valley Watershed Model simulates the entire Salinas River watershed. Monthly surface water inflows into the integrated hydrologic model domain were simulated using the Salinas Valley Watershed Model. The historical model uses historical climate data, water and land use data, and reservoir releases to simulate agricultural operations, including landscape water demands, diversions, and reclaimed wastewater. The operational model adds an embedded reservoir operations framework to the simulation of the historical model that allows specified operational rules to simulate reservoir releases and changes in reservoir storage. The operational model assumes current reservoir operations and constant land use, which differs from historical conditions. Thus, the operational model is a hypothetical baseline model that can be used by local water managers to evaluate and quantify potential benefits of water supply projects. Together, the geologic framework, watershed, historical, and operational models form a tool that can be used to simulate irrigated agriculture and associated reservoir operations of the integrated hydrologic system of the Salinas Valley.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wesley R. Henson, Randy Hanson, Scott Boyce, Joseph A. Hevesi, Elizabeth R. Jachens. 2025. Salinas Valley integrated hydrologic and reservoir operations models, Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties, California. https://doi.org/10.31223/x5zd9n

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Evaluating bank restoration and stabilization in the Yellow River in northern Indiana: Mitigation of sediment and nutrient transport

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Kankakee River Basin and Yellow River Basin Development Commission, evaluated the effects of streambank remediation on the Yellow River in northwest Indiana. Two phases of remediation were completed on the Yellow River between 2021 and 2023, after assessments indicated it was a large contributor of sediment to the Kankakee River. Temporal effects were assessed using pre‑remediation (April 2019 –October 2021) and post‑remediation (February – October 2024) data from two long‑term monitoring sites, USGS 05516665 Yellow River near Oak Grove (Oak Grove) and USGS 05517000 Yellow River at Knox (Knox). Spatial patterns were evaluated among sites from upstream to downstream during the post-remediation period. Monitoring included the pre-existing Oak Grove and Knox sites, an additional monitoring site at USGS streamgage 05516500 Yellow River at Plymouth (Plymouth), and discrete sampling at two additional sites. Discrete sites include USGS 05516663 Yellow River at Upas Rd near Oak Grove (Upas Rd), located upstream of the remediation reach, and USGS 05516667 Yellow River at CR11100E near Oak Grove (CR1100E), located within the remediation reach. Generalized least squares and linear mixed‑effects regression models were used to evaluate temporal differences in turbidity-to-discharge relations for slope and turbidity units, discharge, and suspended‑sediment in before and after remediation data. Similar analysis using generalized least squares and linear mixed‑effects regression models were conducted for spatial analysis of discharge and sediment and nutrient concentrations and fluxes at each site post-remediation. Temporal comparisons showed that turbidity increased less with discharge increases after remediation, indicated by slope of relation, at both Oak Grove and Knox, indicating improved water clarity during higher flows. Mean turbidity and suspended‑sediment concentrations were not statistically different between remediation periods. Comparison of the post-remediation continuous water quality data from upstream to downstream sites through the remediated reaches indicated that downstream sites exhibited steeper turbidity‑to‑discharge slopes than the upstream control site at Plymouth. A statistically significant difference was detected between the slopes at Oak Grove and Plymouth, whereas Knox did not differ significantly from either Plymouth or Oak Grove. Downstream sites had significantly lower mean turbidity, suggesting improved water clarity within and downstream of the remediation reach. Nutrient concentrations generally decreased moving downstream and suspended‑sediment concentrations showed no consistent trend. Nutrient and sediment fluxes increased downstream, likely reflecting the influence of greater discharge volumes. Interpretation of remediation effects was limited by the absence of pre‑remediation data at upstream sites and by the short post‑remediation monitoring period. Continued monitoring could allow for assessment of longer‑term responses to streambank remediation on the Yellow River, as effects may become more pronounced over time.

EarthArXiv↗

Hydrogeology and water quality of the unconsolidated aquifer system in the Lower Fall Creek Valley, Tompkins County, New York

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Tompkins County and the Town of Dryden, conducted a hydrogeologic investigation of the lower Fall Creek unconsolidated aquifer system in Tompkins County, New York. This study is part of an ongoing effort to characterize major valley-fill aquifers in the region to support sustainable groundwater management. The lower Fall Creek valley, encompassing the Village of Freeville, the unincorporated communities of Etna, and the hamlets of McLean and Varna, has experienced moderate development and relies heavily on groundwater for residential, agricultural, and commercial use. The study area spans approximately 51 square miles along the boundary of the Allegheny Plateau and North Rim of the Allegheny Plateau physiographic provinces. The aquifer system, composed primarily of glacially derived sand and gravel deposits, includes both unconfined and confined aquifer units. For the approximately 2,300 people who live over the aquifers, groundwater is the sole source of drinking water. In some areas, such as the Village of Freeville, artesian conditions exist, with potentiometric heads exceeding 25 feet above land surface. This report describes the hydrogeologic framework, aquifer distribution, groundwater-flow dynamics, and water quality of the lower Fall Creek aquifer system. Groundwater is generally hard and contains elevated concentrations of redox-sensitive constituents, such as iron and manganese relative to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency secondary maximum contaminant levels. Arsenic was not detected above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level during this study but remains a regional concern due to past detections in the study area and nearby aquifers. The findings provide data for local planners and resource managers to use in understanding and protecting this water resource.

EarthArXiv↗

Investigation of drivers and sources of potential harmful algal blooms in Lake Anna, Virginia, 2023-24

Algal blooms in freshwater reservoirs are an increasing concern because of the risk to aquatic ecosystem health, recreational use, and water quality. Among the taxa that comprise an algal bloom, cyanobacteria are of particular concern due to the potential to produce toxic compounds which can cause acute and chronic illness in humans if ingested through contaminated water or shellfish. When toxins are above a toxin-specific threshold in the water column, the Commonwealth of Virginia categorizes the bloom as a harmful algal bloom (HAB), distinguishing it from an algal bloom without toxins present. Toxins are of particular concern in bodies of water which serve as major recreational areas, such as Lake Anna in central Virginia. Lake Anna is a 27 km-long and 47 km2 reservoir in central Virginia. Since the Commonwealth of Virginia revised the HAB monitoring framework in 2018, algal bloom advisories for potentially toxigenic blooms have been issued in the western, riverine zone of the reservoir. There were detections of microcystin and anatoxin production but no detections of cylindrospermopsin and saxitoxin production in Lake Anna; however, toxin concentrations were low, at values less than 0.65 µg/L. In 2023, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, initiated a 19-month intensive and extensive study of western Lake Anna and its tributaries (North Anna River and Pamunkey Creek) to (1) characterize the algal community, biomass, and toxin production; (2) identify potential drivers leading to algal bloom initiation, persistence, and decline; and (3) assess the primary sources of the drivers contributing to algal blooms. Continuous and discrete monitoring of water quality within the lake, watershed inputs, meteorological conditions, and algal communities were monitored. Multiple modeling scenarios identified that the formation and persistence of algal blooms in Lake Anna are driven by interactions among chemical, macro- and micronutrient, and physical factors. Key drivers include total nitrogen, total phosphorus, water temperature, suspended sediment concentration, wind speed, copper, iron, molybdenum, nickel, sodium, and alkalinity. During this study, winter stormflow events delivered the highest loading of macro- and micronutrients from the tributaries to the lake. The lake is a sink for these nutrients in the water column or in the lake-bed sediments. During high-occupancy and recreation periods on the lake in the summer months, boating activity can promote internal loading by the resuspension of the lake-bed sediments, thereby increasing the nutrient availability for algal uptake. Thermal stratification and hypoxic conditions were observed, which can contribute to the passive release of nutrients into the water column, further facilitating algal bloom proliferation. These processes may create a positive feedback loop that supports the formation, persistence, and annual recurrence of algal blooms in the western region of Lake Anna. Continued water-quality monitoring of early warning indicators may improve the detection and forecasting of algal growth in the lake and help managers proactively manage water quality and algal growth.

EarthArXiv↗