Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70258323

Detecting avalanche path ground cover and vegetation change across multiple scales through time using remote sensing tools

Abstract

Large-magnitude avalanches often alter vegetation composition, avalanche path dimensions, and subsequent avalanche return periods. Understanding temporal changes in individual avalanche path trimlines, runout zones, and geomorphic characteristics helps forecasters, planners, and engineers estimate potential avalanche destructive size and impact on infrastructure or settlements in the runout zone. Understanding these changes on a large scale also provides information on post-cycle avalanche distribution. Here, we use remote sensing platforms and change detection techniques to examine vegetation change in avalanche paths in Montana and Colorado. In northwest Montana, we implemented a novel approach using lidar, aerial imagery, and a random forest model to classify imagery-observed vegetation within avalanche paths. We calculated spatially explicit avalanche return periods using a physically based spatial interpolation method and characterized the vegetation within those return period zones. In Colorado, we investigated changes in avalanche path vegetation characteristics prior to and after a widespread large-magnitude avalanche cycle. The highest frequency of avalanche return periods was broadly characterized by grassland and shrubland, but topography greatly influences vegetation classes and return periods. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in lidar-derived vegetation canopy height exist between categorical return periods. We used optical sensors from satellite imagery to analyze changes in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to calculate ground cover change over time. NDVI, a measure of near-infrared and red bands within the imagery, allowed us to distinguish between green vegetation (e.g., trees and shrubs) and non-vegetated ground cover (e.g., dead and downed trees, rocks, and dirt) within avalanche paths. For this study, we calculated changes in NDVI values by comparing imagery from 2018 to imagery from 2019 after a widespread large magnitude avalanche cycle occurred in March 2019 in Colorado, United States. We applied a filtering process to reduce error, classified NDVI change based on the value distribution, and then calculated area change of all areas within each avalanche path. We completed this process for 1633 avalanche paths throughout Colorado. We found that using NDVI difference values pre- and post-avalanche cycle allowed us to identify ground cover change in avalanche paths throughout Colorado. These changes span from a slight expansion of existing avalanche paths to substantial landscape disturbance. For example, a size D5 avalanche caused severe ground cover change in 18% of one single path near Aspen, Colorado. This suggests that large magnitude avalanches can redefine avalanche path dimensions and could impact subsequent avalanche size and frequency. Using NDVI from satellite imagery is a simple way to detect ground cover changes in avalanche paths on a large scale or in remote areas. In general, remote sensing products to detect and examine vegetation and ground cover change in avalanche paths can help inform avalanche distribution and benefit planning efforts.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 48.2409445° to 48.6118719° latitude; -113.9377526° to -113.214365° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Erich H. Peitzsch, Zachary Miller, Ron Simonhois, Ethan M. Greene. 2024. Detecting avalanche path ground cover and vegetation change across multiple scales through time using remote sensing tools. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70258323

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Authoritative knowledge infrastructure for GeoAI: Implications for scientific spatial data providers

Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) increasingly relies on automated analysis of authoritative geospatial data, exposing limitations in data infrastructures originally designed for simple dissemination rather than for knowledge-driven use. From the perspective of scientific spatial data providers, the challenge is enabling GeoAI responsibly while retaining semantic clarity, provenance, reproducibility, and governance. This short paper (i) examines how GeoAI exposed limitations within existing geospatial data infrastructures, and (ii) identifies provider-side requirements for an authoritative knowledge infrastructure. Drawing on GIScience, scientific workflow, and operational AI literature, the paper outlines implications for national mapping organizations that seek to support advanced analytics without jeopardizing scientific rigor or stewardship responsibilities.

Conference Paper↗

Springs of the Catskill Mountains: A conduit flow system in predominantly siliciclastic strata

The Catskill Mountains of New York state are composed of thick sequences of interbedded mudstone, sandstone, and siltstone that are intercalated with thin beds of paludal limestone and calcareous mudstone. Sandstones often contain rip-up clasts of calcareous material at their bases and contain minor amounts of carbonate cement throughout their mass. This minor amount of calcareous material weathers out to produce thin zones of solutional porosity and permeability integrated within perched aquifers that feed perennial hillslope springs. Solutional features are evident within thin carbonate lenses and along fractures in sandstones, occasionally resulting in explorable cave-sized conduits. This study focuses on the behavior of bedrock springs and seeps in the headwaters of the Neversink River basin above the Neversink Reservoir. Bedrock springs are numerous throughout the Catskill Mountains and serve to provide baseflow to the headwater streams that tends to be more persistent during dry times than other baseflow sources. We observed dissolution-influenced conduits within the bedrock, and suffosional conduits within unconsolidated materials. Continuous water temperature at six springs was monitored at hourly intervals from May to October 2022 to investigate the thermal response of groundwater to daily and seasonal changes in air temperature along with event-based meteorological events. Temperature monitoring was augmented at some springs with time-lapse photography to evaluate persistence of flow. The thermal responses of springs to precipitation events were highly variable across sites, with some springs exhibiting flashy responses indicating a strong connection to the surface, while other springs showed muted or no thermal response to events. The seasonal thermal response also varied across sites having lag times of 23-48 days between peak air temperature and peak spring water temperature. The water temperatures and geochemical compositions of these bedrock springs support a conceptual model of multiple residence times, showing both event and seasonal groundwater storage within the conduit flow system that feeds the springs of the Catskill Mountains.

New York↗

Rapid deglaciation of the Tuolumne Meadows region linked to glacier hypsometry

During the LGM deglaciation (19–11 ka), episodes of glacier retreat and stabilization in the western United States are often attributed to abrupt climate change events via changes in Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (e.g., Becker et al. 2025; McGee et al. 2018; Phillips 2016). However, there is considerable variability in the magnitude and timing of glacier retreat across the western US that is difficult to reconcile with a uniform climate forcing (Marcott et al. 2019), indicating either heterogeneous climate change or the influence of local non-climatic variables, such as glacier hypsometry (Young et al. 2011). Prior work from basal lake radiocarbon ages (Gillespie and Clark 2011) and cosmogenic nuclide dating (Phillips 2016; Phillips et al. 2009; Rood et al. 2011) established that Sierra Nevada glaciers receded from LGM moraines to north-facing cirques between 18 and 15 ka, with most deglaciation occurring at 15.8 ± 0.5 ka. As discussed above, geomorphic evidence supports abrupt glacier stagnation and in situ melting in the Tuolumne Meadows region.

Calfiornia↗