Geology topics

Ethan M. Greene

Publications and source records attributed to Ethan M. Greene.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

Changing drivers of regional large magnitude avalanche frequency throughout Colorado, USA

Large magnitude snow avalanches (destructive size ≥ D3) impact settlements, transportation corridors, and public safety worldwide. In Colorado, United States, avalanches have killed more people than any other natural hazard since 1950. In March 2019, a large magnitude avalanche cycle occurred throughout the entire mountainous portion of Colorado resulting in more than 1000 reported avalanches during a two-week period. Nearly 200 of these avalanches were size D4 or larger with at least three D5 avalanches. However, placing this 2019 large magnitude avalanche cycle in historic context requires data prior to the instrumental record. Here, we paired tree disturbance data from dendrochronology (1698 to 2020) with meteorological data from the modeled and instrumental record (1901 to 2020) to understand the frequency and climate drivers of large magnitude snow avalanche cycles. The extensive number of downed trees from the 2019 avalanche cycle allowed us to collect 1,188 cross-sections and cores from 1023 individual trees within 24 avalanche paths across the state. From these samples we identified 4135 avalanche-related growth disturbances. We employed a strategic nested sampling design to spatially aggregate avalanche frequency from individual avalanche paths, to counties, to three major sub-regions (i.e., north, central, and south), and across the entire region (i.e., state of Colorado). Over a period spanning more than three centuries (1698 to 2020), we identified 76 avalanche years within 24 individual avalanche paths. Large magnitude avalanche event frequency varied across paths and sub-regions with several notable region-wide avalanche cycles. Both tree-ring and historical written records highlighted 1899 as a year with widespread and large magnitude avalanche activity similar to the March 2019 avalanche cycle. Since the early-20th century (1900 to 2020) regional avalanche probability declined significantly in parallel with decreasing snowpack throughout Colorado. Similarly, dominant avalanche regimes shifted from large magnitude regional cycles driven by above average snowfall years over most of the record, to regional avalanche cycles occurring more commonly in average to low snow years since 1988. In recent decades, a lack of December precipitation and above average March precipitation characterized years with regional large magnitude avalanche activity. Even with declining snow water equivalent, truly extreme regional large magnitude avalanche cycles remain possible – as demonstrated by the 2019 cycle. This underscores that rare but high-impact events are not eliminated by long-term trends. Understanding the changing snow and weather drivers and subsequent behavior of large magnitude avalanche cycles across multiple spatial scales may improve avalanche forecasting and the products and mitigations strategies developed by structural engineers to mitigate avalanche danger. This can decrease the avalanche risk to the public and improve infrastructure design in avalanche terrain.

Colorado↗

USGS2024

Detecting avalanche path ground cover and vegetation change across multiple scales through time using remote sensing tools

Large-magnitude avalanches often alter vegetation composition, avalanche path dimensions, and subsequent avalanche return periods. Understanding temporal changes in individual avalanche path trimlines, runout zones, and geomorphic characteristics helps forecasters, planners, and engineers estimate potential avalanche destructive size and impact on infrastructure or settlements in the runout zone. Understanding these changes on a large scale also provides information on post-cycle avalanche distribution. Here, we use remote sensing platforms and change detection techniques to examine vegetation change in avalanche paths in Montana and Colorado. In northwest Montana, we implemented a novel approach using lidar, aerial imagery, and a random forest model to classify imagery-observed vegetation within avalanche paths. We calculated spatially explicit avalanche return periods using a physically based spatial interpolation method and characterized the vegetation within those return period zones. In Colorado, we investigated changes in avalanche path vegetation characteristics prior to and after a widespread large-magnitude avalanche cycle. The highest frequency of avalanche return periods was broadly characterized by grassland and shrubland, but topography greatly influences vegetation classes and return periods. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in lidar-derived vegetation canopy height exist between categorical return periods. We used optical sensors from satellite imagery to analyze changes in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to calculate ground cover change over time. NDVI, a measure of near-infrared and red bands within the imagery, allowed us to distinguish between green vegetation (e.g., trees and shrubs) and non-vegetated ground cover (e.g., dead and downed trees, rocks, and dirt) within avalanche paths. For this study, we calculated changes in NDVI values by comparing imagery from 2018 to imagery from 2019 after a widespread large magnitude avalanche cycle occurred in March 2019 in Colorado, United States. We applied a filtering process to reduce error, classified NDVI change based on the value distribution, and then calculated area change of all areas within each avalanche path. We completed this process for 1633 avalanche paths throughout Colorado. We found that using NDVI difference values pre- and post-avalanche cycle allowed us to identify ground cover change in avalanche paths throughout Colorado. These changes span from a slight expansion of existing avalanche paths to substantial landscape disturbance. For example, a size D5 avalanche caused severe ground cover change in 18% of one single path near Aspen, Colorado. This suggests that large magnitude avalanches can redefine avalanche path dimensions and could impact subsequent avalanche size and frequency. Using NDVI from satellite imagery is a simple way to detect ground cover changes in avalanche paths on a large scale or in remote areas. In general, remote sensing products to detect and examine vegetation and ground cover change in avalanche paths can help inform avalanche distribution and benefit planning efforts.

Montana↗

USGS2023

The relationship between whumpf observations and avalanche activity in Colorado, USA

Triggering whumpfs is a primary indicator of unstable snowpack conditions. Although backcountry travelers and avalanche forecasters rely on whumpfs as a warning sign of potential avalanches, there is little formal research to confirm this relationship. This study investigated the temporal correlation between whumpfs and avalanche activity in data from Colorado's Front Range and southern San Juan Mountains between the winters of 2010/11 and 2022/23. To assess changing conditions over a variety of seasons, we compared the timing of whumpfs and avalanches to the total snow depth at a representative site. We used a 13-inch (33 cm) rolling-window average snow depth versus the median for observed whumpfs, and small avalanches (D1 to D1.5), and large to very large avalanches (D2 and greater). Our results support informal observations that whumpfs are important indicators of avalanche activity, especially at shallower snow depths. Later in the season, when snow depths are deeper and basal weak layers become more difficult to trigger, whumpfs become less common even during periods of increasing avalanche activity. Some of our results may be due to the thin, weak, and wind-affected snow in the Colorado Front Range, where whumpfing typically occurs due to collapsing basal depth hoar. Our findings are important for backcountry travelers assessing stability and for backcountry avalanche forecasters communicating conditions to the public. Our data show that although whumpfs generally indicate unstable conditions and correlate with avalanche activity, the largest avalanches of the winter may not always be preceded by whumpfing.

Colorado↗

USGS2023

Using tree rings to compare Colorado’s 2019 avalanche cycle to previous large avalanche cycles

Large magnitude avalanches (size ≥D3) impact settlements, transportation corridors, and public safety worldwide. In Colorado, United States, avalanches have killed more people than any other natural hazard since 1950. In March 2019, a historically large magnitude avalanche cycle occurred throughout the entire mountainous portion of Colorado resulting in more than 1000 reported avalanches during a 2-week period. Nearly 200 of these avalanches were size D4 or larger with at least three D5 avalanches. The extensive number of downed trees from this avalanche cycle allowed us to collect 1188 cross-sections and cores from 1023 unique trees within 24 avalanche paths across the state. We recorded 4135 growth disturbances in these samples. These data comprise the largest known avalanche tree-ring dataset in the world. We employed a strategic nested sampling design to account for scale by including several individual avalanche paths within a given drainage to create sub-regions and then sampled six major sub-regions (counties) throughout the greater region (state). We identified 76 avalanche years within 24 individual avalanche paths from 1698 to 2020. Large magnitude empirical avalanche event frequency varied across paths and sub-regions. Our results indicate the most widespread avalanche cycle in our study area prior to 2019 occurred in 1899, where 12 avalanche paths show evidence of large magnitude avalanche activity. Historical records also highlight 1899 as a year with widespread and large magnitude avalanche activity. These results indicate the avalanche cycle of March 2019 was of similar magnitude. Understanding the spatial extent and return frequency of large magnitude avalanche cycles across multiple spatial scales, from individual paths to an entire state, helps avalanche forecasters improve their products and mitigation strategies and assists infrastructure planners when designing and planning in avalanche terrain.

Colorado↗

USGS2023

Big avalanches in a changing climate: Using tree-ring derived avalanche chronologies to examine avalanche frequency across multiple climate types

Large-magnitude snow avalanches pose a hazard to humans and infrastructure worldwide. Analyzing the spatiotemporal behavior of avalanches and the contributory climate factors is important for understanding historical variability in climate-avalanche relationships as well as improving avalanche forecasting. This study uses established dendrochronological methods to develop long-term regional avalanche chronologies for three different climate types: high-latitude maritime climate of southeast Alaska, intermountain climate of the northern Rocky Mountains, and continental climate of Colorado. In the maritime study area, we collected 434 cross sections throughout six avalanche paths near Juneau, Alaska. This resulted in 2706 identified avalanche growth disturbances between year 1720 and 2018 Common Era (CE), which allowed us to reconstruct 82 years with large magnitude avalanche activity across three sub-regions. By combining this tree-ring derived avalanche dataset with a suite of climate and atmospheric variables and applying a generalized linear model to fit a binomial regression, we found February and March precipitation and the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) were significant predictors of large magnitude avalanche activity in the southeast Alaska study area. In the intermountain climate study area, tree-rings from 647 trees exhibited 2134 avalanche-related growth disturbances in the northern Rocky Mountains of northwest Montana from 1867 to 2019. The data show that the amount of snowpack across the northern Rocky Mountain region is directly related to avalanche probability. Coincident with warming and regional snowpack reductions, a decline of ~ 14% (~ 2% per decade) in overall large magnitude avalanche probability is apparent through the period 1950–2017 CE. In the continental climate of Colorado, we sampled 24 avalanche paths throughout the state and collected 1188 total samples with 4135 identified growth disturbances from 1698 to 2019. Preliminary results suggest years with large magnitude avalanche activity across the sub-regions of this study area are generally characterized by stormy winters with above average snowpack development but that early and late winter temperature and precipitation also play an important role in large avalanche activity. Characterizing historical climate-avalanche relationships across different climate types provides a broad baseline for understanding potential future changes in avalanche activity. Overall, this work helps forecasters and planners better understand the influence of climate on large magnitude avalanche frequency, and how potential changes in avalanche character and occurrence will affect their operations in the context of a warming climate.

Alaska, Colorado, Montana↗