Extending body condition scoring beyond measurable rump fat to estimate full range of nutritional condition for moose

Rebecca L. Levine; Rachel A. Smiley; Brett R. Jesmer; Brendan A. Oates; Jacob R. Goheen; Thomas R. Stephenson; Matthew J. Kauffman; Gary L. Fralick; Kevin L. Monteith

USGS · 70236821

Extending body condition scoring beyond measurable rump fat to estimate full range of nutritional condition for moose

Rebecca L. Levine·Rachel A. Smiley·Brett R. Jesmer·Brendan A. Oates·Jacob R. Goheen·Thomas R. Stephenson·Matthew J. Kauffman·Gary L. Fralick·Kevin L. Monteith

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Moose ( Alces alces ) populations along the southern extent of their range are largely declining, and there is growing evidence that nutritional condition — which influences several vital rates – is a contributing factor. Moose body condition can presently be estimated only when there is measurable subcutaneous rump fat, which equates to animals with >6% ingesta-free body fat (IFBFat). There is need for a technique to allow body fat estimation of animals in poorer body condition (i.e., <6% body fat). We advance current methods for moose, following those used and validated with other ungulate species, by establishing a moose-specific body condition score (BCS) that can be used to estimate IFBFat in the lower range of condition. Our modified BCS was related strongly ( r 2 = 0.89) to IFBFat estimates based on measurable rump fat. By extending the predicted relationship to individuals without measurable fat, the BCS equated severe emaciation with 0.67% IFBFat, supporting the accuracy of the method. The lower end of nutritional condition is important for identifying relationships involving life-history characteristics because most state-dependent changes occur at lower levels of condition. Therefore, until the BCS can be validated with moose carcasses, we believe our method to estimate body fat across the full range of condition should yield better understanding of the drivers underlying declining moose populations.

Explore related subjects

Alces Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Rebecca L. Levine, Rachel A. Smiley, Brett R. Jesmer, Brendan A. Oates, Jacob R. Goheen, Thomas R. Stephenson, Matthew J. Kauffman, Gary L. Fralick, Kevin L. Monteith. 2022. Extending body condition scoring beyond measurable rump fat to estimate full range of nutritional condition for moose. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70236821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2023

Birth rates and neonate survival in a parasite rich moose population in Vermont, USA

Moose ( Alces alces ) populations are declining across much of their southern geographic range in North America. In Vermont and other northeastern states, measurable declines are attributed to low calf survival and reduced productivity associated with persistent winter tick ( Dermacentor albipictus ) parasitism. In 2017–2020, we studied 75 radio-collared female moose (38 calves and 37 adults) in Vermont to examine physiological, spatial, and temporal parameters relative to calf survival and adult productivity. Physiological measures included concentration of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCM) which reflects stress, and urea nitrogen:creatinine ratios in urine (UN:C) which proxy nutritional state. The pregnancy rate at capture across years was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.50 – 0.80), and was negatively related to presence of lungworm ( Dictyocaulus spp.). The birth rate calculated as the average number of offspring delivered per adult female was <1.0 overall (2017–2020, LCI = 0.22, UCI = 0.86), similar across years, but increased with age. Logistic exposure models indicated that daily calf survival to 60 d increased as Julian birth date and days since birth increased (log odds = 0.0819, SE = 0.0215). The per capita independence rate, or rate that adult females add independent calves to the population, was negatively related to UN:C ratios and positively with fGCM. Further, this rate was related to autumnal habitat use of adult females; it was greater in home ranges characterized by large amounts of mature (canopy) evergreen forests and wetland habitats, and small amounts of mixed forests and elevation than in ranges with abundant levels of mixed forest at high elevation. We conclude that winter ticks can negatively affect moose fecundity, and efforts to reduce host (moose) density through harvest or parasite (host) abundance through habitat manipulation may improve productivity and recruitment in local moose populations.

Vermont↗

USGS2021

Modeling moose habitat use by age, sex, and season in Vermont, USA using high-resolution lidar and national land cover data

Moose ( Alces alces ) populations have experienced unprecedented declines along the southern periphery of their range, including Vermont, USA. Habitat management may be used to improve the status of the population and health of individuals. To date, however, Vermont wildlife managers have been challenged to effectively use this important tool due to the lack of fine-scale information on moose space use and habitat characteristics. To assess habitat use, we combined more than 40,000 moose locations collected from radio-collared individuals (n = 74), recent land cover data, and high resolution, 3-dimensional lidar ( light detection and ranging ) data to develop Resource Utilization Functions (RUF) by age (mature and young adult), season (dormant and growth), and sex. Each RUF linked home range use to average habitat conditions within 400 m or 1 km of each 30 m 2 pixel within the home range. Across analyses, the top RUF models included both composition (as measured through the National Land Cover Database) and structure (as measured through lidar) variables, and significantly outperformed models that excluded lidar variables. These findings support the notion that lidar is an effective tool for improving the ability of models to estimate patterns of habitat use, especially for larger bodied mammals. Generally speaking, female moose actively used areas with proportionally more regenerating forest (i.e., forage < 3.0 m) and more mature forest (i.e., canopy structure > 6.0 m), while males actively used more high elevation, mixed forest types. Further, moose exhibited important seasonal differences in habitat use that likely reflect temporal changes in energetic and nutritional requirements and behavior across the year. Moose used areas with proportionally more regenerating forest (i.e., forage < 3.0 m) during the growth period and female moose had strong positive associations with lidar-derived canopy structure during the growth (but not the dormant) period. Ultimately, the resultant maps of habitat use provide a means of informing management activities (e.g., the restoration or alteration of habitats to benefit moose) and policies around land use that may contribute to population recovery.

Vermont↗

USGS2015

Population genetic structure of moose ( Alces alces ) of South-central Alaska

The location of a population can influence its genetic structure and diversity by impacting the degree of isolation and connectivity to other populations. Populations at range margins are often thought to have less genetic variation and increased genetic structure, and a reduction in genetic diversity can have negative impacts on the health of a population. We explored the genetic diversity and connectivity between 3 peripheral populations of moose ( Alces alces ) with differing potential for connectivity to other areas within interior Alaska. Populations on the Kenai Peninsula and from the Anchorage region were found to be significantly differentiated (F ST = 0.071, P < 0.0001) with lower levels of genetic diversity observed within the Kenai population. Bayesian analyses employing assignment methodologies uncovered little evidence of contemporary gene flow between Anchorage and Kenai, suggesting regional isolation. Although gene flow outside the peninsula is restricted, high levels of gene flow were detected within the Kenai that is explained by male-biased dispersal. Furthermore, gene flow estimates differed across time scales on the Kenai Peninsula which may have been influenced by demographic fluctuations correlated, at least in part, with habitat change.

Alces↗