Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70228891

INHABIT: A web-based decision support tool for invasive plant species habitat visualization and assessment across the contiguous United States

Abstract

Narrowing the communication and knowledge gap between producers and users of scientific data is a longstanding problem in ecological conservation and land management. Decision support tools (DSTs), including websites or interactive web applications, provide platforms that can help bridge this gap. DSTs can most effectively disseminate and translate research results when producers and users collaboratively and iteratively design content and features. One data resource seldom incorporated into DSTs are species distribution models (SDMs), which can produce spatial predictions of habitat suitability. Outputs from SDMs can inform management decisions, but their complexity and inaccessibility can limit their use by resource managers or policy makers. To overcome these limitations, we present the Invasive Species Habitat Tool (INHABIT), a novel, web-based DST built with R Shiny to display spatial predictions and tabular summaries of habitat suitability from SDMs for invasive plants across the contiguous United States. INHABIT provides actionable science to support the prevention and management of invasive species. Two case studies demonstrate the important role of end user feedback in confirming INHABIT’s credibility, utility, and relevance.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 25.08° to 49.38905° latitude; -124.68721° to -66.96466° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peder Engelstad, Catherine S. Jarnevich, Terri Hogan, Helen R. Sofaer, Ian S. Pearse, Jennifer Sieracki, Neil Frakes, Julia Sullivan, Nicholas E. Young, Janet S. Prevéy, Pairsa Nicole Belamaric, Jillian Marie Laroe. 2022-02-08. INHABIT: A web-based decision support tool for invasive plant species habitat visualization and assessment across the contiguous United States. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263056

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Cost-efficient filtration and replication strategies match or exceed detection sensitivity for marine eDNA diversity at an intertidal site under a standardized laboratory workflow

Optimizing environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to maximize species detection while minimizing costs and effort remains a challenge, particularly in high-throughput workflows. In the marine intertidal zone off Point Conception, California, we compared eDNA richness accumulation between filtration approaches that differed in filter type and downstream processing, field and laboratory replicates, and independent and pooled polymerase chain reaction (PCR) replicates. Ten 10-cm 2 capsule filters and 10 5-cm 2 syringe disc filters were processed using a standardized laboratory workflow for 12S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) (marine vertebrates) and 18S rRNA (metazoans and phytoplankton) metabarcoding, with 10 independent PCR replicates per filter. Because capsules generated larger lysate volumes than discs, the fixed extraction input volume under the standardized workflow resulted in less lysate being processed. A follow-up study pooled 10 PCR replicates for 12S rRNA. When comparing individual PCR replicates, individual filters, or all filters aggregated, discs detected greater marine vertebrate richness than capsules. Probabilistic models indicated that varying effective volume alone could produce similar richness accumulation patterns to those observed, though other filter characteristics were unaccounted for. Minimal differences in richness accumulation were detected between filters for 18S rRNA, and modeling indicated that this was not explained by higher initial copies of 18S rRNA. Meanwhile, vertebrate richness accumulation was similar when adding PCR replicates from the same sample or independent field samples across the short, relatively homogenous intertidal transect. Pooling PCR replicates had no detectable difference on richness compared to sequencing PCR replicates independently: a single pooled PCR replicate detected the same vertebrate richness as the sum of 10 independent PCR replicates. These results show that, under the standardized workflow and conditions tested here, eDNA programs may reduce costs and effort without detectable loss of richness by using filtration approaches aligned with extraction input and pooling technical replicates.

California↗

Using high frequency GPS data to assess wintering goose proximity to commercial poultry facilities on the Delmarva peninsula for avian influenza risk management and surveillance

The ongoing global outbreak of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus (HPAIv) Clade 2.3.4.4 H5N1 in poultry, which was first detected in the United States (USA) in February 2022, underscores the importance of improving food biosecurity and wild bird surveillance. The Delmarva Peninsula is vital to wintering waterfowl and to poultry production, thereby increasing the risk of HPAIv outbreaks. By using fine-scale GPS tracking of Greater Snow Geese (GSGO, N = 59) and Canada Geese (CANG, N = 9) over four winters (2019–2023), we 1) demonstrate a risk ranking system for poultry facilities based on exposure to wintering waterfowl, and 2) model this exposure in relation to temporal, geographic, and land cover factors. We showed that an ordinal-percentile ranking system, based on goose points per hour (gp/h) at poultry facilities, effectively predicted HPAIv H5N1 outbreak risks in the Delmarva Peninsula. Seven facilities with outbreaks were in the 78–99th risk percentile, including one ranked among the top 25 of 6,021 facilities. Such ranking criteria could be used to guide biosecurity efforts when response teams’ resources are limited. Notably, one-third of Delmarva poultry facilities had GPS-marked waterfowl present during winters, indicating a significant presence despite our limited sample sizes. We analyzed the variability in goose exposure rates near poultry facilities over four winters. Time (week) during winter was the key predictor of exposure, with greater GSGO presence in mid-late winter (Dec 15 to Feb 28) and CANG exposure peaking in early winter (Nov 28 to Dec 11), then stabilizing until late winter (Feb to Mar 13), whereupon exposure increased again. Colder temperatures (below 0°C) significantly increased GSGO exposure as they sought waste grain for energy. Goose exposure for both species was high throughout the winter, necessitating 24-hour surveillance. Proximity to sewage treatment plants (≤2 km), National Wildlife Refuges (≤5 km), water bodies (≤5 km), and the coast (≤20 km) increased exposure levels. Additionally, inland areas with features such as reservoirs and lakes supported large numbers of geese near facilities.

Delaware, Maryland, Virginia↗

Improving restoration heuristics to support anadromous fish passage

Investments in restoring river connectivity are growing worldwide to support freshwater biodiversity. Although optimization methods exist for selecting cost-effective restoration portfolios, decisions are often guided by simple heuristic rules. For example, managers may prioritize restoring barriers blocking the largest amounts of high-quality upstream habitat, ignoring the position of other barriers in the system. These heuristics often rely on proxies for watershed connectivity and habitat quality. Using anadromous fish passage restoration in western Washington, USA, as a case study, we show that redesigning these heuristics can yield substantial performance gains. Benchmarking common heuristics against optimization outcomes reveals that connectivity proxies based on total upstream habitat can achieve 93% of optimal gains when increasing habitat quantity is the sole objective, but adding widely used proxies for habitat quality (e.g., percent of upstream natural land cover) can cut performance nearly in half. These findings underscore the importance of designing heuristics that more directly target high-quality habitat gains to improve investment efficiency and help close the science–practice gap between optimization research and on-the-ground restoration decisions.

Washington↗