Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70227321

Selection of random vibration theory procedures for the NGA-East project and ground-motion modeling

Albert R. Kottke·Norman A. Abrahamson·David M. Boore·Yousef Bozorgina·Christine A. Goulet·Justin Hollenback·Tadahiro Kishida·Olga-Joan Ktenidou·Ellen Rathje·Walt Silva·Eric M. Thompson·Xiaoyue Wang
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Traditional ground-motion models (GMMs) are used to compute pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA) from future earthquakes and are generally developed by regression of PSA using a physics-based functional form. PSA is a relatively simple metric that correlates well with the response of several engineering systems and is a metric commonly used in engineering evaluations; however, characteristics of the PSA calculation make application of scaling factors dependent on the frequency content of the input motion, complicating the development and adaptability of GMMs. By comparison, Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) represents ground-motion amplitudes that are completely independent from the amplitudes at other frequencies, making them an attractive alternative for GMM development. Random vibration theory (RVT) predicts the peak response of motion in the time domain based on the FAS and a duration, and thus can be used to relate FAS to PSA. Using RVT to compute the expected peak response in the time domain for given FAS therefore presents a significant advantage that is gaining traction in the GMM field. This article provides recommended RVT procedures relevant to GMM development, which were developed for the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-East project. In addition, an orientation-independent FAS metric—called the effective amplitude spectrum (EAS)—is developed for use in conjunction with RVT to preserve the mean power of the corresponding two horizontal components considered in traditional PSA-based modeling (i.e., RotD50). The EAS uses a standardized smoothing approach to provide a practical representation of the FAS for ground-motion modeling, while minimizing the impact on the four RVT properties ( zeroth moment, m0 ; bandwidth parameter, δ ; frequency of zero crossings, fz ; and frequency of extrema, fe ). Although the recommendations were originally developed for NGA-East, they and the methodology they are based on can be adapted to become portable to other GMM and engineering problems requiring the computation of PSA from FAS.

Explore related subjects

Earthquake SpectraArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Albert R. Kottke, Norman A. Abrahamson, David M. Boore, Yousef Bozorgina, Christine A. Goulet, Justin Hollenback, Tadahiro Kishida, Olga-Joan Ktenidou, Ellen Rathje, Walt Silva, Eric M. Thompson, Xiaoyue Wang. 2021-07-13. Selection of random vibration theory procedures for the NGA-East project and ground-motion modeling. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211019052

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

An examination of the reasons for, and variability of, the differences between response spectra and pseudo response spectra

For many decades, it has been common practice to overlook the differences between response spectra and pseudo response spectra. This practice stems from analyses indicating that the average difference between response spectra and pseudo response spectra is negligible for a viscous damping ratio of 5%, which is near-universally adopted. As others have shown, the differences depend strongly on the damping ratio, earthquake magnitude, and oscillator period, with larger differences for larger damping, smaller magnitudes, and longer periods. To quantify the full statistical distribution of the ratio of the absolute acceleration response spectrum (SA) to the pseudo absolute acceleration response spectrum (PSA), we fit empirical ratios with the generalized gamma distribution. Data for magnitudes from 4.0 to 5.5 give 95% prediction intervals for the ratio of 1.00–1.02 at 1 s and 1.01–2.24 at 10 s for 5% damping. For 30% damping, these intervals increase to 1.14–2.01 at 1 s and 1.62–11.8 at 10 s, respectively. Further, we demonstrate how the shape of the ground-motion Fourier amplitude spectrum interacts with the natural period of the oscillator to control the differences in the response spectra type. Routinely treating the two measures of acceleration response spectra as interchangeable may lead to unacceptable inconsistencies when the response spectra of individual records are important or when larger damping ratios are used, such as in direct displacement-based design. If one must convert between them, the uncertainty of the conversion should be accounted for during analysis.

Earthquake Spectra↗
USGS2026

Accounting for biases in the analysis of building damage data for the 2023 M7.8 Türkiye/Syria earthquake sequence

In the aftermath of a large earthquake, several practical constraints affect the systematic collection of data for assessing building damage. The available data are therefore typically incomplete, frequently missing key information such as the type of construction, age and geographic location. Moreover, the observations often favour certain locations and damage grades. In the absence of robust methods, using such data directly for characterising the building stock or conducting fragility assessments can introduce systematic bias. Using the 2023 M7.8 Türkiye/Syria earthquake sequence as a case study, we propose a statistical model that enables joint inference over the inventory and fragility of the building stock while explicitly accounting for sources of data error and missing information. The results show higher-than-expected vulnerability amongst several building types, particularly mid- and high-rise reinforced concrete buildings, which performed extremely poorly during the 2023 earthquake sequence. The proposed Bayesian framework provides rigorous uncertainty quantification that can be propagated to future applications.

Earthquake Spectra↗
USGS2026

Suite of regional seismic velocity models for the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains (CPVMv2.0): Incorporating epistemic uncertainty in velocity models

The U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain (CP) sediments are kilometers-thick, low-velocity deposits underlain by high-velocity bedrock that create regional patterns of amplification and attenuation of ground motions. Capturing these effects is challenging because of the limited subsurface information available, particularly the shear wave velocity ( V S ) structure down to bedrock (or assumed reference rock condition) and the associated uncertainties. This paper introduces a new suite of regional velocity models for the CPs, called CPVMv2.0, which builds upon previous efforts integrating geology, V S measurements, and sediment thickness in the region. CPVMv2.0 uses 750 measured V S profiles and identifies nine surficial-geologic-age-based and geography-based groups (with alternative physiographic-province-based subgroupings) to create surface-based median V S profiles. This suite of new models also includes six subsurface-based median profiles developed using geologic age boundaries from depth-dependent stratigraphic sequences extracted from the U.S. Geological Survey National Crustal Model. In addition to quantifying aleatory variability in sediment velocity, weathered-rock velocity, bedrock velocity, and the depth to the top of weathered rock and bedrock, CPVMv2.0 provides alternative profile models that allow for the characterization of the epistemic uncertainty. This is a unique and relevant feature of CPVMv2.0. Our suite of models was validated using measured and estimated fundamental resonant frequencies as well as other V S models in the region. CPVMv2.0 enables the incorporation of crustal velocities (and their associated variability and uncertainty) into physics-based ground-motion simulations in the eastern United States and into the development of new ground-motion models aiming to characterize systematic site effects via V S30 , depths to V S isosurfaces, and/or sediment thickness in the region.

U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains↗