Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70226913

Invasive sea lamprey detection and characterization using interdigitated electrode (IDE) contact sensor

Abstract

The ability to monitor invasive sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) populations in the Laurentian Great Lakes is critical to protecting the region’s $ 7 billion USD fishing industry and preserving its biodiversity. Monitoring these invaders requires considerable fieldwork and human power, making remote lamprey detection systems attractive for their continuous monitoring capabilities and potential for workload reduction. However, a lack of available methods for detecting sea lamprey hampers development of such systems. Here we present a sensor composed of two exposed planar interdigitated electrodes (IDE) along with a DC measurement system for the detection of lamprey attachment underwater. Measuring voltage instead of impedance, reduces cost and signal processing complexity, making the device more attractive for field deployment. The system is calibrated to a baseline output voltage and deviations from this baseline occur when objects touch the IDE. Validation was done through testing on live adult sea lampreys using video recordings to correlate lamprey attachments to the sensor response. Three response types were identified corresponding to different attachments: sustained, short and sliding-sustained. Sensor response to sustained and sliding-sustained attachments showed a characteristic exponential decay whereas the response due to short attachments was indistinguishable from measurement noise. Lamprey size was found to have a weak linear correlation with both response parameters, positive for the voltage drop and negative for the time constant of voltage drop. A representative circuit for the lamprey-sensor interaction is proposed and simulated using element values calculated from the response parameters. The response of the model shows agreement with experimental data.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 41.36444153054222° to 49.03786794532644° latitude; -92.21923828124999° to -75.91552734375° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ian Gonzalez-Afanador, Hongyang Shi, Christopher M. Holbrook, Xiaobo Tan, Nelson Sepulveda. 2021. Invasive sea lamprey detection and characterization using interdigitated electrode (IDE) contact sensor. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2021.3122884

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Automated soft pressure sensor array-based sea lamprey detection using machine learning

Sea lamprey, a destructive invasive species in the Great Lakes in North America, is among very few fishes that rely on oral suction during migration and spawning. Recently, soft pressure sensors have been proposed to detect the attachment of sea lamprey as part of the monitoring and control effort. However, human decision is still required for the recognition of patterns in the measured signals. In this article, a novel automated soft pressure sensor array-based sea lamprey detection framework is proposed using object detection convolutional neural networks. First, the resistance measurements of the pressure sensor array are converted to mappings of relative change in resistance. These mappings typically show two different types of patterns under lamprey attachment: a high-pressure circular pattern corresponding to the mouth rim compressed against the sensor (“compression” pattern), and a low-pressure blob corresponding to the partial vacuum region of the sucking mouth (“suction” pattern). Three types of object detection algorithms, single-shot detector (SSD), RetinaNet, and YOLOv5s, are applied to the dataset of measurements collected in the presence of sea lamprey attachment, and the comparison of their performance shows that YOLOv5s model achieves the highest mean average precision (mAP) and the fastest inference speed. Furthermore, to improve the accuracy of the prediction model and reduce the false positive (FP) rate due to the sensor’s memory effect, a filter branch with different detection thresholds for the compression and suction patterns, respectively, is added to the original machine-learning algorithm. The trained model is validated and used to automatically detect sea lamprey attachments and locate the suction area on the sensor in real time.

IEEE Sensors Journal

Soft pressure sensor for underwater sea lamprey detection

In this paper, an economical and effective soft pressure sensor for underwater sea lamprey detection is proposed, which consists of an array of piezoresistive elements between two layers of perpendicular copper tape electrodes, forming a passive resistor network. With multiplexers, the apparent resistance corresponding to each pixel of the sensing matrix can be measured directly, where the pixel is identified with the row and the column of the respective electrodes. However, this measured two-point resistance is not equal to the actual cell resistance for that pixel due to the crosstalk effect in the resistor network. Since the cell resistance reflects directly the pressure applied on each pixel, the relationship between the cell resistance and the measured two-point resistance is analyzed for a passive matrix of any size. More importantly, several regularized least-squares algorithms are proposed to reconstruct the cell resistance profile from the two-point resistance measurements, with enhanced robustness of the reconstruction in the presence of measurement noises and modeling errors. The proposed pressure sensor is applied to detect the suction attachment of sea lampreys, a devastating invasive species in the Great Lakes region. Experimental results demonstrate that the pressure sensor can successfully capture the rim profile of the lamprey’s sucking mouth. Moreover, the performance and computational complexity of the reconstruction algorithms with different regularization functions are compared.

IEEE Sensors Journal