Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70168380

Habitat structure and body size distributions: Cross-ecosystem comparison for taxa with determinate and indeterminate growth

Abstract

Habitat structure across multiple spatial and temporal scales has been proposed as a key driver of body size distributions for associated communities. Thus, understanding the relationship between habitat and body size is fundamental to developing predictions regarding the influence of habitat change on animal communities. Much of the work assessing the relationship between habitat structure and body size distributions has focused on terrestrial taxa with determinate growth, and has primarily analysed discontinuities (gaps) in the distribution of species mean sizes (species size relationships or SSRs). The suitability of this approach for taxa with indeterminate growth has yet to be determined. We provide a cross-ecosystem comparison of bird (determinate growth) and fish (indeterminate growth) body mass distributions using four independent data sets. We evaluate three size distribution indices: SSRs, species size–density relationships (SSDRs) and individual size–density relationships (ISDRs), and two types of analysis: looking for either discontinuities or abundance patterns and multi-modality in the distributions. To assess the respective suitability of these three indices and two analytical approaches for understanding habitat–size relationships in different ecosystems, we compare their ability to differentiate bird or fish communities found within contrasting habitat conditions. All three indices of body size distribution are useful for examining the relationship between cross-scale patterns of habitat structure and size for species with determinate growth, such as birds. In contrast, for species with indeterminate growth such as fish, the relationship between habitat structure and body size may be masked when using mean summary metrics, and thus individual-level data (ISDRs) are more useful. Furthermore, ISDRs, which have traditionally been used to study aquatic systems, present a potentially useful common currency for comparing body size distributions across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kirsty L. Nash, Craig R. Allen, Chris Barichievy, Magnus Nystrom, Shana M. Sundstrom, Nicholas A.J. Graham. 2014-04-10. Habitat structure and body size distributions: Cross-ecosystem comparison for taxa with determinate and indeterminate growth. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01314

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

A framework for investigating fish population density responses to habitat fragmentation

Globally, fish populations that rely on rivers are being fragmented by in-stream barriers, but it is unclear how pervasive any negative population responses to fragmentation are. We developed a modeling framework for estimating density responses of fishes upstream and downstream of in-stream barriers and applied it to learn how low-head dams have influenced fish assemblages in 24 Great Lakes tributaries. Of the 29 species modeled, we found strong evidence for increased (n = 6 species) and decreased population densities (n = 6 species) in habitat upstream of low-head dams, while we only found strong evidence for population increases downstream of dams (n = 16 species). The time required for 50% of the dam-induced change to fish population density to occur, t 50 , was on the order of decades; mean t 50 was 41 years in habitat downstream of low-head dams and 21 years in upstream habitat. Estimates of t 50 suggest that negative effects occurred faster than positive effects. However, the power of this comparison remains limited because evidence for the logistic population growth model used to derive t 50 was strong for only 1 of 29 fish species. We propose that different mechanisms account for the responses observed, with positive responses driven by changes in assemblage structure and negative responses driven by decreased immigration. Our research demonstrates how frameworks considering metapopulation dynamics and the potential for time lags between barrier construction and fish population responses can advance understanding of how in-stream barriers structure the distribution and abundance of fish populations in rivers.

Great Lakes↗

Hosts, pathogens and hot ponds: Thermal mean and variability contribute to spatial patterns of chytrid infection

Temperature is a primary driver of heterogeneity in host–pathogen dynamics and understanding how patch-scale temperature affects landscape-scale patterns of pathogen infection is key to effective monitoring and management. In field studies, both temperature variability and mean temperature are often related to infection of ectothermic animals by fungal pathogens, and although these factors vary spatiotemporally, their contributions to infection outcomes are rarely decomposed into spatial and temporal components. We studied how patch-scale thermal conditions (mean and variability) affect infection of eastern newts Notophthalmus viridescens by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis ( Bd ), with a special focus on disentangling spatial versus temporal contributions of thermal conditions to infection outcomes. We measured in situtemperature and Bd infection across 20 ponds in two years in southeastern Wisconsin, USA to 1) understand thermal mediation of infection and 2) quantify whether seasonal and/or among-site variation in thermal conditions drive heterogeneity in host–pathogen interactions. In our system, thermal mean and variability covaried tightly, necessitating the creation of a single index to capture both components. We found that 1) this index of thermal mean and variability was strongly and nonlinearly related to Bd infection and 2) differences among patches in thermal conditions drove this relationship, highlighting that variation in patch-level conditions can drive heterogenous host–pathogen outcomes across landscapes. Our research collectively reveals insights about the importance of local, patch-level conditions for mediating disease risk at broader scales.

Wisconsin↗

Bioclimatic, demographic, and anthropogenic correlates of grizzly bear activity patterns in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Plasticity of diel activity rhythms may be a key element for adaptations of wildlife populations to changing environmental conditions. In the last decades, grizzly bears Ursus arctos in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) have experienced notable environmental fluctuations, including changes in availability of food sources and severe droughts. Although substantial research has been conducted on grizzly bear diets, space use, and demographic parameters, studies on factors that may influence their diel activity patterns are lacking. We investigated diel activity of grizzly bears in the GYE as a function of anthropogenic landscape modification, maximum daily ambient temperature, drought severity, and bear density. Specifically, we used accelerometry readings of 169 bears (39 females, 130 males) from 2009 to 2022 to compute three complementary activity measures, hourly intensity of activity, daily active minutes, and active bout length, each used as a response variable within a Bayesian modeling framework. Grizzly bears generally exhibited bimodal diel activity, with crepuscular peaks and slight variations across seasons. Females with young (i.e. cubs or yearlings) were an exception, with more pronounced diurnal activity patterns, possibly as a strategy to avoid infanticide by dominant males. Landscape modification and maximum ambient temperature were the factors most strongly associated with activity patterns of grizzly bears, with greater nocturnality observed in lone females and males as these factors increased. Females with young were comparatively less affected. The GYE is changing because of increasing land development, human recreation pressures, and effects of climate change. Given their greater diurnal activity compared with other cohorts, female grizzly bears with dependent offspring may be more constrained in their ability to modify activity patterns. Our findings add to a growing body of research emphasizing the importance of the temporal dimension of wildlife behavior as a critical factor in assessing species adaptability and vulnerability in a changing world.

Idaho, Montana, Wyoming↗