Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70022052

Alunite-jarosite crystallography, thermodynamics, and geochronology

Abstract

The alunite supergroup consists of more than 40 mineral species that have in common the general formula DG 3 ( T O 4 ) 2 (OH,H 2 O) 6 . The D sites are occupied by monovalent (e.g. K, Na, NH 4 , Ag, Tl, H 3 O), divalent (e.g. Ca, Sr, Ba, Pb), trivalent (e.g. Bi, REE) or more rarely quadrivalent (Th) ions; G is Al or Fe 3+ or rarely Ga or V; T is S 6+ , As 5+ , or P 5+ , and may include subordinate amounts of Cr 6+ or Si 4+ . Many of the minerals in this supergroup are exotic, having been described from relatively few localities worldwide, generally in association with ore deposits. Rarely are end-member compositions attained in these natural occurrences, and extensive solid solution is typical for one or more of the D , G , and T sites. In this chapter, the two solid-solution series considered in detail are alunite-natroalunite [KAl 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 – NaAl 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 ] and jarosite-natrojarosite [KFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 – NaFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 ]. These minerals are by far the most abundant naturally occurring species of the alunite supergroup. Minerals with the generalized formula cited above can be variously grouped, but the simplest initial subdivision is on the basis of Fe > Al versus Al > Fe. Further subdivision is generally made on the basis of the predominant cation within the two T O 4 sites. Thus, within the supergroup, the alunite group consists of minerals in which both of the T sites are occupied by sulfur. This leads to a total negative charge of four on the T O 4 sites. In the ideal formulas of some members of the supergroup [e.g. woodhouseite, CaAl 3 (PO 4 )(SO 4 )(OH) 6 ], half of the T sites are occupied by sulfur, and the other half by arsenic or phosphorus, which produces a total negative charge of five on the T O 4 sites. In still other end-members of the supergroup [e.g. crandallite, CaAl 3 (PO 4 ) 2 (OH) 5 (H 2 O), and arsenocrandallite, CaAl 3 (AsO 4 ) 2 (OH) 5 (H 2 O)], both of the T sites are occupied solely by phosphorus or arsenic, thus producing a total negative charge of six on the T O 4 sites (see Table 1 1 of Dutrizac and Jambor, this volume). In this chapter, however, the primary concern is with those minerals for which T O 4 is represented by SO 4 2− (Table 1 1 ). Precipitates with compositions near those of the end-members in the system alunite-natroalunite and jarosite-natrojarosite are readily prepared using sulfate salts. The products, however, almost invariably have a slight to appreciable deficiency in G 3+ , and have an apparent non-stoichiometry for D . The latter may reflect incorporation a H 3 O + , a solid solution that is difficult to prove because H 3 O + cannot be determined directly by wet-chemistry or microprobe methods. Nevertheless, the existence of two minerals in the alunite supergroup is dependent solely on their D -site predominance of H 3 O + , namely, hydronium jarosite [(H 3 O)Fe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 ] and schlossmacherite [(H 3 O,Ca)Al 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH,H 2 O) 6 ]. This chapter is organized into four sections. In the first section, crystallographic data for alunite-natroalunite and jarosite-natrojarosite are presented and discussed. The second section describes available thermodynamic data for these two solid-solution series, in terms of properties of the end-members and mixing properties for intermediate compositions. The third section discusses the geochemistry and occurrences of alunite and jarosite, and the last section summarizes the published literature on the use of alunite and jarosite in geochronology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R.E. Stoffregen, Charles N. Alpers, J.L. Jambor. 2000. Alunite-jarosite crystallography, thermodynamics, and geochronology. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2000.40.9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

The early Earth as an analogue for exoplanetary biogeochemistry

Planet Earth has evolved over the past 4.5 billion years from an entirely anoxic planet with possibly a different tectonic regime to the oxygenated world with horizontal plate tectonics that we know today. For most of this time, Earth has been inhabited by a purely microbial biosphere albeit with seemingly increasing complexity over time. A rich record of this geobiological evolution over most of Earth’s history thus provides insights into the remote detectability of microbial life under a variety of planetary conditions. Here we leverage Earth’s geobiological record with the aim of (a) illustrating the current state of knowledge and key knowledge gaps about the early Earth as a reference point in exoplanet science research; (b) compiling biotic and abiotic mechanisms that controlled the evolution of the atmosphere over time; and (c) reviewing current constraints on the detectability of Earth’s early biosphere with state-of-the-art telescope technology. We highlight that life may have originated on a planet with a different (stagnant lid) tectonic regime and strong hydrothermal activity, and under these conditions, biogenic CH 4 gas was perhaps the most detectable atmospheric biosignature. Oxygenic photosynthesis, which is responsible for essentially all O 2 gas in the modern atmosphere, appears to have emerged concurrently with the establishment of modern plate tectonics and the emergence of continental crust, but O 2 accumulation to modern levels only occurred late in Earth’s history, perhaps tied to the rise of land plants. Nutrient limitation in anoxic oceans, promoted by hydrothermal Fe fluxes, may have limited biological productivity and O 2 production. N 2 O is an alternative biosignature that was perhaps significant on the redox-stratified Proterozoic Earth. We conclude that the detectability of atmospheric biosignatures on Earth was not only dependent on biological evolution but also strongly controlled by the evolving tectonic context.

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry↗

The lunar cratering chronology

This chapter provides an introduction to crater-size frequency distribution (CSFD) measurements and presents a review of the work performed on dating lunar geological units using CSFDs since the last New Views of the Moon volume (2006), including various volcanic and tectonic features, as well as individual impact craters. At the end of the chapter, implications for the new CSFD age determinations for the geologic history and evolution of the Moon are discussed.

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry↗

Lunar mare basaltic volcanism: Volcanic features and emplacement processes

Volcanism is a fundamental process in the geological evolution of the Moon, providing clues to the composition and structure of the mantle, the location and duration of interior melting, the nature of convection and lunar thermal evolution. Progress in understanding volcanism has been remarkable in the short 60-year span of the Space Age. Before Sputnik 1 in 1957, the lunar farside was unknown, the origin of the dark lunar maria was debated (sedimentary or volcanic), and significant controversy surrounded the question of how the multitude of craters on the surface formed. Was the Moon formed hot or cold, was the lunar surface young or old, were the craters of impact or volcanic origin? A lunar farside deficient in the darker maria was revealed by Luna 3 in 1959 ( Lipsky 1965a , b ). The Ranger, Lunar Orbiter, Surveyor, Luna and Zond missions significantly augmented pre-Sputnik telescopic observations and began to reveal the diversity of lunar geologic landforms. Return of lunar soil and rock samples from the lunar surface by Apollo (11–12, 14–17) ( Compton 1989 ) and Luna (16, 20, 24) missions ( Harvey 2007a , b ; Huntress and Marov 2011 ) changed the debates overnight ( Hinners 1971 ; Taylor 1975 ). The lunar rocks were igneous and extremely ancient, all from the first half of Solar System history; the oldest, highland anorthosites, were overlain by relatively younger, but still extremely old, extrusive basalts forming the maria.

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry↗