Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70012526

Numerical simulation of dissolved silica in the San Fancisco Bay

Abstract

A two-dimensional (vertical) steady-state numerical model that simulates water circulation and dissolved-silica distributions is applied to northern San Francisco Bay. The model (1) describes the strong influence of river inflow on estuarine circulation and, in turn, on the biologically modulated silica concentration, and (2) shows how rates of silica uptake relate to silica supply and mixing rates in modifying a conservative behavior. Longitudinal silica distributions influenced by biological uptake (assuming both vertically uniform and vertically decreasing uptake situations) show that uptake rates of 1 to 10 μg-at. l −1 day −1 are sufficient to depress silica concentrations at river inflows of 100–400 m 3 s −1 , respectively, and that the higher rates appear ineffective at inflows above 400 m 3 s −1 . The simulations further indicate that higher silica utilization in the null zone is not essential to depress silica concentrations strongly there. Advective water-replacement times at river inflows of 400, 200 and 100 m 3 s −1 are computed to be less than 25, 45 and 75 days, respectively, for a 120-km estuary-river system.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 37.1474706473157° to 38.34439724009863° latitude; -122.6710764794829° to -121.75339054752408° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David H. Peterson, John F. Festa, T. J. Conomos. 1978. Numerical simulation of dissolved silica in the San Fancisco Bay. https://doi.org/10.1016/0302-3524(78)90068-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Location of the non-tidal current null zone in northern San Francisco Bay

Variations in Sacramento-San Joaquin River discharge into northern San Francisco Bay causes shifts in location of the bottom density current null zone. At a river flow of 2000 m 3 /s this null zone is approximately 20 km from the seaward end of the estuary, whereas at a river flow of 100 m 3 /s it is 80 km from the seaward end; the corresponding distances of salinity penetration are approximately 40 and 90 km from the seaward end. Seaward of the null zone, during low (summer) river discharge conditions, the inward-flowing bottom density current appears typically strong (5–15 cm/s) relative to the outward-flowing river current (river discharge per unit cross-channel area) of <2 cm/s. Landward from this null zone the average river current increases with decreasing cross-channel area. This circulation implies that during the summer water within the null zone has the longest average advective replacement time relative to water seaward or landward of the null zone.

California