Search USGSSearch

SEARCH · Search USGS

Results for “Publication”

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Wolf management in the 21st century: From public input to sterilization

Human-population increase and land development portend increasing conflict with large predators. Concurrently, changes and diversification of human attitudes are bringing increased disagreement about wildlife management. Animal-rights advocacy resulting from urbanization of human populations conflicts with traditional wildlife management. These forces focus more on wolves than on other wildlife because of strong public and media interest in wolves. Thus wolf management in the future will come under even greater public scrutiny, involve more public input, and may have greater restrictions imposed on it. This will lead to increased complexity in wolf management including more zoning, more experimentation with lethal and non-lethal capture techniques and alternate methods of alleviating damage to pets, livestock, and large ungulate herds, and greater public and private subsidy of wolf damage. One form of non-lethal control of wolf populations that may hold some promise is direct sterilization of males to reduce the biotic potential of the wolf population. Experimental vasectomy of five wild male wolves from four packs in Minnesota indicates that sterile males will continue to hold mates and territories, which would be necessary if sterilization is to be a viable technique for assisting with population control. If sterile males held territories but failed to produce pups, such territories might contain only about a third the number of wolves as fertile pack territories. Because wolves are long-lived in unexploited populations and their territories are large, direct sterilization of relatively few animals each year might significantly reduce populations.

Journal of Wildlife Research

Acid rain publications by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1979-1989

Pollution of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems has been a concern to society since the burning of fossil fuels began in the industrial revolution. In the past decade or so, this concern has been heightened by evidence that chemical transformation in the atmosphere of combustion by-products and subsequent long-range transport can cause environmental damage in remote areas. The extent of this damage and the rates of ecological recovery were largely unknown. "Acid rain" became the environmental issue of the 1980's. To address the increasing concerns of the public, in 1980 the Federal government initiated a 10-year interagency research program to develop information that could be used by the President and the Congress in making decisions for emission controls. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been an active participant in acid precipitation research. The Service provided support to a number of scientific conferences and forums, including the Action Seminar on Acid Precipitation held in Toronto, Canada, in 1979, an international symposium on Acidic Precipitation and Fishery Impacts in Northeastern North America in 1981, and a symposium on Acidic Precipitation and Atmospheric Deposition: A Western Perspective in 1982. These meetings as well as the growing involvement with the government's National Acidic Precipitation Assessment Program placed the Service in the lead in research on the biological effects of acidic deposition. Research projects have encompassed water chemistry, aquatic invertebrates, amphibians, fish, and waterfowl. Water quality surveys have been conducted to help determine the extent of acid precipitation effects in the northeast, Middle Atlantic, and Rocky Mountain regions. In addition to lake and stream studies, research in wetland and some terrestrial habitats has also been conducted. Specific projects have addressed important sport species such as brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), and striped bass (Morone saxatilis). Trace metal accumulation in fish has been investigated and a symposium sponsored on related work. U.S> Fish and Wildlife Service scientists serve as advisors and participants in research being conducted by industry, nonprofit groups, State and other Federal agencies. Researcher have worked closely with colleagues in Canada, England, Norway, Scotland, the Soviet Union, and Sweden to gain additional understanding of the problem. In 1982, the Service implemented a mitigation research program to provide resource managers with information to help them protect sensitive ecosystems, and rehabilitation methods for resources already affected by acidification. An international workshop was convened to outline the research needs. Several conferences were organized to develop appropriate field and laboratory procedures. Scientists with the mitigation research program are evaluating the ecological effects of liming (addition of base material) surface waters and surrounding watershed to provide buffering against acidic inputs. Through long-term cooperative project with States and other organizations, investigations are studying possible abatement methods for regions most affected by acidic deposition. To date, more than 200 reports the describe these studies have been published. These products include conference proceedings, journal articles, and in-house scientific publications. An education poster describing the effects of acid rain on aquatic ecosystems was developed and distributed to individuals, conservations and State organizations, and the public education system. This annotated bibliography lists current publications by Service authors, cooperators, or contractors on acid rain and related quality. Entire are arranged alphabetically by author surname. For further information about the research program, contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Acid Precipitation Section, National Fishery Research Center -- Leetown, Box 700, Kearneysville, WV 25430.

Biological Report

Non-native animals on public lands

Non-native plants and animals have become part of our surroundings, in cities, agricultural areas, and wildlands. While there are many beneficial purposes for non-native animals, such as for food and sport hunting and as agricultural animals, the introduction of some has had major negative economic consequences (Palmer 1899), and adverse effects on native wildlife, plants, and habitats. The British ecologist Charles Elton, in a major review of introduced species, described the increasing number of invasions as constituting "one of the great historical convulsions in the world's flora and fauna" (Elton 1958, p. 31). Non-native species are significant problems on large areas of state and federal public lands, and areas set aside to protect native plant and animal communities are not immune to such harm. Science and conservation journals have devoted entire issues to the threats posed by non-native plants and animals in nature reserves (e.g., Usher et al. 1988). In a compilation of threats to U.S. national parks, non-native plants and animals were the most often reported threat, and were reported by the most areas; feral cats ( Felis catus ), feral dogs ( Canis familiaris ), and wild pigs ( Sus scrofa ) were the non-native animals cited most often (NPCA 1977). Non-native species present serious threats, but at the same time, coordinated efforts on public lands offer the best possibility for controlling some harmful non-native species, and protecting both native plant and animal communities and human interests and needs. We compiled information on non-native animals on public and private land-management areas by conducting a mail survey to assess their occurrence and management status in land-management areas. Survey results represent contributions from 937 national parks, national forests, national wildlife refuges, Bureau of Land Management field areas, and state and private land-management areas. The results reflect those species that land managers considered of greatest concern, and their general distribution on public lands. Non-native invertebrate animals, particularly forest insects and agricultural pests, cause severe economic and environmental damage as well (OTA 1993), but were not the focus of this survey.

Book chapter

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1985

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published in 1985, and (2) articles by Geological Survey personnel in non-Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1985; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961"; "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970"; and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971-1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1986

This catalog is a list of (1) books and mapsl that were published during 1986, and (2) articles by Geological Survey personnel in non-Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1986; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of-.the Geological Survey, 1879-1961", "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970", and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1989

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published during 1989, and (2) articles by Geological Survey personnel in non-Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1989; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961", "Publications of the Geological Survey; 1962-1970", and ''Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1990

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps 1 that were published during 1990, and (2) articles by Geological Survey personnel in non-Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1990; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961", "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970", and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1991

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published during 1991, and (2) articles by Geological Survey personnel in non-Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1991; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961", "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970", and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1992

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps 1 that were published during 1992, and (2) articles by U.S. Geological Survey personnel in non-U.S. Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1992; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961", "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970", and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981.

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1993

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published during 1993, and (2) articles by U.S. Geological Survey personnel in non-U.S. Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1993; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961", '"Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970", and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1996

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published during 1996 and (2) articles by U.S. Geological Survey personnel in non-U.S. Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1996; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961," "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970," and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1997

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published during 1997 and (2) articles by U.S. Geological Survey personnel in non-U.S. Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1997; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961,'' "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970," and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1998

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published during 1998 and (2) articles by U.S. Geological Survey personnel in non-U.S. Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1998; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961," "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970," and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1999

This catalog is a list of (1) books and maps that were published during 1998 and (2) articles by U.S. Geological Survey personnel in non-U.S. Geological Survey journals and books that came to our attention in 1998; it supplements the permanent catalogs "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961," "Publications of the Geological Survey, 1962-1970," and "Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1971 through 1981."

Publications of the US Geological Survey

Habitat features influencing waterbird use of managed wetlands enrolled in a public-private partnership for land conservation: The California Waterfowl Habitat Program

Draining, water diversion, and development have greatly reduced the availability of freshwater wetland habitat around the world, and many remaining wetlands are on private lands. Public–private partnership programs can be an important means for promoting habitat conservation and management on private lands. We investigated bird use of 117 wetlands enrolled in the California Waterfowl Habitat Program in California's Central Valley, where two-thirds of wetlands are under private ownership and management. Specifically, we quantified the influence of wetland habitat features and surrounding land cover on waterbird density and diversity in late winter and early spring and during the waterfowl breeding season. Dabbling duck and shorebird densities were highest in wetlands that had water depths < 20 cm, and waterbird densities decreased with water depth. Greater amounts of emergent vegetation, especially tall and dense emergent vegetation, had a negative effect on total waterbird density but a positive effect on species richness and secretive marsh bird density. Shorebird and breeding duck densities were lower in wetlands with a large number of trees and other potential perch sites, and waterbird densities decreased with the amount of nearby wetland habitat on the landscape. Overall, we estimated that during late winter and early spring, private properties that were enrolled in the California Waterfowl Habitat Program (8000–8500 ha each year) supported 480,000 birds per day during extreme drought conditions in 2022 and 280,000 birds per day in more normal, non-drought conditions in 2023. Over the 76-day winter and early spring survey period, this amounted to more than 20 million bird use days on wetlands enrolled in the California Waterfowl Habitat Program during late winter and early spring. These results demonstrate the value of public–private wetland conservation partnerships, the influence of wetland habitat features and surrounding land cover on waterbird abundance, and the benefits of habitat features that could be incorporated into management plans and wetland selection criteria for enrollment into public–private conservation programs.

California

Prioritizing science efforts to inform decision making on public lands

Public land management agencies in the US are committed to using science-informed decision making, but there has been little research on the types and topics of science that managers need most to inform their decisions. We used the National Environmental Policy Act to identify four types of science information needed for making decisions relevant to public lands: (1) data on resources of concern, (2) scientific studies relevant to potential effects of proposed actions, (3) methods for quantifying potential effects of proposed actions, and (4) effective mitigation measures. We then used this framework to analyze 70 Environmental Assessments completed by the Bureau of Land Management in Colorado. Commonly proposed actions were oil and gas development, livestock grazing, land transactions, and recreation. Commonly analyzed resources included terrestrial wildlife, protected birds, vegetation, and soils. Focusing research efforts on the intersection of these resources and actions, and on developing and evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation measures to protect these resources, could strengthen the science foundation for public lands decision making.

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

"Report a Landslide” A website to engage the public in identifying geologic hazards

Direct observation by people is the most practical way of identifying, locating, and describing most damaging landslides. In an effort to increase public awareness of landslide hazards and encourage public participation in collecting basic data about landslides, the USGS recently launched a website called “Report a landslide.” The website is modeled in part after the highly successful USGS website “Did you feel it?” which has been used for several years to gather data from the public about intensity of felt earthquakes. The new “Report a landslide” website encourages visitors to report where and when they observed a landslide and to classify the landslide by movement type. Interested users also can report information about damage and casualties, dimensions, and simple geological observations, and can submit photographs of the landslide. Once a user submits a report, the location of the reported landslide appears on a map, and the location is linked to a summary of submitted data. Photos are reviewed prior to posting on the event page. By adding existing USGS data from historical landslides and promoting the website in the wake of large, regional landslide events, we hope to generate widespread awareness and interest in the website. The “Report a landslide” site has great potential for eventually creating a nationwide source of basic landslide data.

Conference Paper

Fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface: what the public expects

Urban-wildland issues have become among the most contentious and problematic issues for forest managers. Using data drawn from surveys conducted by the authors and others, this article discusses how public knowledge and perceptions of fire policies and fire hazards change over time, the kinds of policy responses homeowners prefer as a way of preventing fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface, and how citizens view their own obligations as participants in interface issues. These data show that public attitudes toward fire have changed significantly over the past two decades and that educating the public about fire and the managers' use of fire can have positive effects on behavior. Yet, modifying the individual's behavior in regard to interface fire risks must also deal with important issues of individual incentives, the distribution of costs, and unanticipated policy impacts.

Environmental Management