Search USGS⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search USGS

Results for “Memoir”

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Chapter 1: Previous research

Santorini has fascinated and stimulated explorers and scholars since ancient times. Jason and the Argonauts were apparently visitors to the islands and described a giant called Talos. Molten metal flowed from his feet and he threw stones at them. The island is perhaps best known for the paroxysmal eruption that took place in the Late Bronze Age at the height of the Minoan civilization that dominated Crete and the Aegean region. The legend of Atlantis, in which a whole city sank beneath the sea in a single day and night, is plausibly based on the effects of this eruption on the Minoan Civilization. The geographer Strabo described the eruption of 197 bc in the following way: ... for midway between Thera and Therasia fires broke forth from the sea and continued for four days, so that the whole sea boiled and blazed, and the fires cast up an island which was gradually elevated as though by levers and consisted of burning masses... This introduction gives a brief synopsis of research on the volcano since this dramatic chronicle was written. Research on Santorini has contributed substantial advances not only in the understanding of Santorini itself but to general principles in volcanology and petrology. three centres for lava eruptions on Therasia and northern Thera: the Peristeria, Simandiri and Skaros-Therasia Volcanoes.

Santorini↗

Chapter 2: Geological and tectonic setting of Santorini

Santorini lies in an area of complex extensional and subduction-related tectonics in a continental environment (Jackson 1994). The region has had a long geological history with large changes occurring during the Alpine orogeny and in the Late Tertiary as a consequence of post-collisional extension and major re-adjustments of the plate boundaries. The Aegean region is thought to be moving towards the southwest where the Aegean microplate overrides the Eastern Mediterranean sea floor. The collision has created the Hellenic trench to the south of Crete where the eastern Mediterranean sea floor is subducting beneath the Aegean Sea at 5-6 cm a-1. Santorini is one of several Quaternary volcanoes that define the present day active volcanic arc related to this subduction zone (Fig. 2.1). We here provide a synopsis of the broader geological and tectonic context of Santorini within the Aegean area. The geology, isotope geochemistry and geochronology of the crystalline basement of the southern Aegean is of particular relevance as it is likely that the Santorini magmas have interacted extensively with the continental crust. Geochemical evidence presented in Chapters 6 and 7 confirms this prediction. We also give a synopsis of the Quaternary Aegean Island Arc, of which Santorini is the most active centre.

Santorini↗

Chapter 3: Development of the Santorini volcanic field in space and time

Santorini is one of the largest Quaternary volcanic centres of the Aegean Region. The caldera cliffs preserve well-exposed sequences of lavas and pyroclastic deposits, which record the long development of the volcano in space and time. These include the products of 12 major explosive eruptions and the dissected remains of several ancient lava shields, stratovolcanoes, and lava-dome complexes. The former existence of multiple eruptive centres scattered over the present-day islands shows that Santorini is best considered as a volcanic field , which probably also continues under the sea (Heiken & McCoy 1984). Santorini is best known for the Minoan eruption of the late Bronze Age (Bond & Sparks 1976; Heiken & McCoy 1984; Sparks & Wilson 1990), but some of the previous explosive eruptions may have been as large (Druitt et al . 1989). The occurrence of repeated explosive eruptions has triggered formation of at least four large calderas, such that the present-day caldera is a composite structure (Druitt & Francaviglia 1992). Santorini is potentially one of the most dangerous volcanoes in Europe, having had numerous eruptions in historic times, some of them with significant explosive components (Fytikas et al . 1990 a ).

Santorini↗

Chapter 4: Compositional zoning and petrology of the Thera pyroclastics

Compositional zoning is a common feature of pyroclastic deposits erupted from calderas worldwide (Smith 1979; Hildreth 1981; Bacon & Druitt 1988; De Silva 1991; Feeley & Davidson 1994). Compositionally zoned tuffs provide a geologically instantaneous snapshot of the vertical stratigraphy and density stratification in the chamber immediately before eruption. Magma bodies are commonly zoned in density, with light, relatively cool, silicic magma overlying hotter, more mafic magma. Vertical zonation can arise by a number of processes, including crystallization and convective fractionation on the chamber.

Santorini↗

Chapter 5: Cumulate nodules in the Thera pyroclastics

Gabbroic and dioritic nodules are common in some horizons of the Thera pyroclastics. These nodules contain pyroxene as the main ferromagnesian phase in contrast to the early Akrotiri centre, which contain nodules with abundant hornblende (Nicholls 1971a; Pichler & Kussmaul 1972). Calcsilicate nodules and gabbroic nodules have also been recognized in Santorini lavas (Fouqu6 1879; Nicholls 1971a). Previous studies of Santorini volcanic rocks indicate that crystal fractionation has played an important role in generating the compositional range basalt-andesite-dacite-rhyodacite (Nicholls 1971a; Mann 1983; Huijsmans 1985; Barton & Huijsmans 1986). This interpretation is also consistent with much of the petrological data presented in Chapter 4 and the geochemical data and models presented in Chapter 6. However, disequilibrium phenocryst assemblages in some lavas (Huijsmans 1985; Chapter 4), banded pumice clasts in many pyroclastic deposits (Druitt et al. 1989; Chapters 4), isotopic disequilibria in phenocrysts (Pyle et al. 1988; Chapters 6 and 7) and complex zoning patterns in plagioclase crystals (Stamatelopoulou-Seymour et al. 1990) indicate that magma mixing has also occurred. In addition, trace element and isotopic abundances can be interpreted in terms of assimilation of continental crust during fractionation (Barton et al. 1983; Stamatelopoulou-Seymour et al. 1990; Chapter 6). The nodules provide information on petrogenetic processes that have influenced the evolution of Santorini magmas. Their petrology is documented in this chapter and compared with that of associated juvenile ejecta. The nodules are identified as cumulates from andesitic and dacitic magmas, con- firming the importance of fractional crystallization in the petrogenesis of Santorini magmas. They also demonstrate that mafic plutonic rocks can be formed from intermediate to silicic magmas.

Santorini↗

Chapter 7: Studies of short-lived radionuclides in Santorini volcanics

Disequilibria between the short-lived radioactive nuclides 226 Ra, 230 Th and 238 U in young volcanic rocks can be used both for dating the time of crystallisation of a rock, and as isotopic tracers of the sources of magmas and the chemical evolution of volcanic systems. The principles of these methods have been reviewed extensively elsewhere (Condomines et al . 1988; Gill et al . 1992; Gill & Condomines 1992; Macdougall 1995). In this chapter, we present new 238 U- 230 Th- 226 Ra disequilibria data for the Thera pyroclastics and for selected lavas. These data complement the radiogenic isotopic data presented in Chapter 6 on the compositional evolution through time of the pyroclastic ejecta. In particular, we find that the ( 230 Th/ 232 Th) isotopic ratio corrected to the time of eruption varies in a systematic way with time through the second cycle of the Thera pyroclastics and variations in this ratio are correlated with the variations of 87 Sr/ 86 Sr, 143 Nd/ 144 Nd and Pb isotopes.

Santorini↗

Chapter 8: The evolution of Santorini

There now follows a synthesis of the main results of this study. We interpret the observations in terms of the interplay between magmatic, tectonic and volcanic processes and place these processes within a global context. Santorini has displayed a wide variety of igneous and volcanic phenomena over a period of at least 650 000 years of almost continuous and focused volcanism. Perhaps the most intriguing issues are the causes of volcanic and magmatic cyclicity, the secular variations in magma composition and the way in which magmatic processes have influenced the style of volcanism.

Santorini↗

Appendix 1: Analytical methods and errors

Thirty eight K-Ar and eight 40Ar/39Ar high-precision age determinations were made at the US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, on a total of 22 rocks from the entire volcanic field. Duplicate or triplicate determinations were carried out on 14 samples in order to improve analytical precision. All ages were measured on whole-rock samples selected after thin-section examination. Most of the samples meet the usual criteria for whole-rock dating (Mankinen © Dal-rymple 1972), but some contain minor amounts of glass and a few samples are very glassy. The samples selected for dating were crushed to 0.5-lmm (-18 to +35 mesh). For K-Ar dating aliquots weighing c. 25 g were used for the Ar measurements. A 10 g aliquot was ground to -200 mesh and splits of the powder were used for K20 measurements, which were made in duplicate on each of two separate splits of sample powder by flame photometry after lithium metaborate fusion and dissolution (Ingamells 1970). Ar analyses were by isotope-dilution mass spectrometry using a high-purity (>99.9%) 38Ar tracer and techniques and equipment described previously (Dalrymple & Lanphere 1969). All samples for Ar extraction were baked overnight at 280°C. Mass analyses were done on a 22.68 cm radius, multiple-collector mass spectrometer with a nominal 90° sector magnet, using automated data collection (Stacey etal 1981). Errors given for the calculated K-Ar ages of individual measurements are estimates of the standard deviation of analytical precision. The errors were calculated using formulae derived by Cox & Dalrymple (1967) and Dalrymple & Lanphere (1969).

Geological Society, London, Memoirs↗

Appendix 2: Tabulated analytical data

Details of analytical methods and errors are given in Appendix 1. bd means below detection and na not analysed. Samples numbers which begin with the letter S are from Druitt (1983) and those that begin with LS are from Edwards (1994). Sample numbers which begin with the number 8 are either from Mellors (1988) or Pyle (1990 b ). Subunits of each major tuff of the Thera pyroclastics are denoted by upper case letters (A to D). These are listed in Table 3.4. In the case of the minor sequences (Appendix 2.3), the sequence abbreviations (M6 to M8) are shown in Fig. 3.17 and the individual unit abbreviations (CD1 to CD10) are from Edwards (1994).

Geological Society, London, Memoirs↗

Current controlled deposition on the Wilkes Land continental rise, Antarctica

Turbidite, contourite and hemipelagic deposition are the main components of Wilkes Land continental rise sedimentation above the regional unconformity WL2. On the continental shelf, unconformity WL2 marks the start of shelf progradation, which is interpreted to correspond with the onset of glacial conditions in this segment of the east Antarctic margin. Unusually large (i.e. up to 900 m relief and 18 km between levee crests) channel-levee deposits, and high relief (up to 490 m) mounded contourite-style deposits develop above unconformity WLlb. Unconformity WLlb overlies unconformity WL2 and is interpreted to have formed under a fully continental glacial regime where ice streams reached the palaeo-continental shelf edge. Based on an analysis of multichannel seismic profiles and sediment cores, we differentiate three phases in the development of the sedimentary unit between WLlb and the present seafloor. From older to younger these are: Phase 1, dominated by turbidite deposition; Phase 2, dominated by turbidite and contourite deposition with significant mound building; and Phase 3, dominated by turbidite and contourite deposition without active mound building. We hypothesize that building of the mounds during Phase 2 corresponded with times of expansion of the Antarctic ice-sheet when vast amounts of sediment were eroded from the continent and continental shelf. The large amount of unsorted glacial sediment supplied to the outer shelf apparently travelled down the slope canyons and rise channels as turbidity current flows to feed the usually large continental rise channel-levee complexes. The suspended fines of the turbidity flows were then entrained in a palaeo-nepheloid layer and carried by the westward flowing palaeo-contour currents until their deposition in the mounds. During Phase 3, sediment supply to the continental rise, although important in volume and capable of turbidite and contour-current deposition, was insufficient to support further building of the mounds. We believe the decrease in sediment supply to the continental rise from Phase 2 to Phase 3 could be the result of a change on sediment depocentres, with most of the sediment supplied to the margin during Phase 3 being trapped on the continental shelf. We believe that ultimately these changes are related to the stage of glacial evolution of the continent.

Geological Society, London, Memoirs↗

An overview of the petroleum geology of the Arctic

Nine main petroleum provinces containing recoverable resources totalling 61 Bbbl liquids+269 Bbbloe of gas are known in the Arctic. The three best known major provinces are: West Siberia–South Kara, Arctic Alaska and Timan–Pechora. They have been sourced principally from, respectively, Upper Jurassic, Triassic and Devonian marine source rocks and their hydrocarbons are reservoired principally in Cretaceous sandstones, Triassic sandstones and Palaeozoic carbonates. The remaining six provinces except for the Upper Cretaceous–Palaeogene petroleum system in the Mackenzie Delta have predominantly Mesozoic sources and Jurassic reservoirs. There are discoveries in 15% of the total area of sedimentary basins ( c. 8×10 6 km 2 ), dry wells in 10% of the area, seismic but no wells in 50% and no seismic in 25%. The United States Geological Survey estimate yet-to-find resources to total 90 Bbbl liquids+279 Bbbloe gas, with four regions – South Kara Sea, Alaska, East Barents Sea, East Greenland – dominating. Russian estimates of South Kara Sea and East Barents Sea are equally positive. The large potential reflects primarily the large undrilled areas, thick basins and widespread source rocks.

Geological Society Memoir↗

Geology and petroleum potential of the Timan-Pechora Basin Province, Russia

The Timan–Pechora Basin Province represents the northeastern-most cratonic block of Eastern European Russia. More than 16 billion barrels of oil (BBO) and 40 trillion cubic feet of gas (TCFG) have been discovered in this basin. Three geological assessment units (AU) were defined for assessing the potential for undiscovered oil and gas resources. The NW Izhma Depression AU encompasses all potential structures and reservoirs in the northwestern part of the Izhma–Pechora Depression, but this part of the basin contains little source and reservoir rocks and so was not assessed quantitatively. The Main Basin Platform AU includes all structures and reservoirs that developed in the central part of the basin where the tectonic evolution and development of petroleum systems were complex. The Foredeep Basins AU includes all potential reservoirs within the thick sedimentary section of the foredeep basins developed during the Permo-Triassic Uralian Orogeny. For the Timan–Pechora Basin Province, the estimated means of undiscovered resources are 3.3 BBO, 17 TCFG and 0.3 billion barrels of natural gas liquids (BBNGL). For the areas of the AUs north of the Arctic Circle in the Timan–Pechora Basin Province, the estimated means of undiscovered resources are 1.7 BBO, 9.0 TCFG and 0.2 BBNGL. The Pechora Sea was assessed with the South Barents Sea Province and is not included in this assessment.

Pechora Basin Province↗

Geology and petroleum potential of the east Barents Sea Basins and Admiralty Arch

The US Geological Survey (USGS) recently assessed the potential for undiscovered oil and gas resources of the East Barents Basins and Novaya Zemlya Basins and Admiralty Arch Provinces as part of the USGS Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal. These two provinces are located NE of Scandinavia and the northwestern Russian Federation, on the Barents Sea Shelf between Novaya Zemlya to the east and the Barents Platform to the west. Three assessment units (AUs) were defined in the East Barents Basins for this study – Kolguyev Terrace Assessment Unit (AU), South Barents Basin and Ludlov Saddle AU, and North Barents Basin AU. A fourth, defined as Novaya Zemlya Basins and Admiralty Arch AU, is coincident with the Novaya Zemlya basins and Admiralty Arch Province. These AUs, all lying north of the Arctic Circle, were assessed for undiscovered, technically recoverable resources resulting in total estimated mean volumes of approximately 7.4 billion barrels of crude oil, 318 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 1.4 billion barrels of natural gas liquids.

Geological Society Memoir↗

Sedimentary successions of the Arctic Region (58–64° to 90°N) that may be prospective for hydrocarbons

A total of 143 sedimentary successions that contain, or may be prospective for, hydrocarbons were identified in the Arctic Region north of 58&ndash;64&deg;N and mapped in four quadrants at a scale of 1:11 000 000. Eighteen of these successions (12.6%) occur in the Arctic Ocean Basin, 25 (17.5%) in the passive and sheared continental margins of the Arctic Basin and 100 (70.0%) on the Circum-Arctic continents of which one (<1%) lies in the active margin of the Pacific Rim. Each succession was assigned to one of 13 tectono-stratigraphic and morphologic classes and coloured accordingly on the map. The thickness of each succession and that of any underlying sedimentary section down to economic basement, where known, are shown on the map by isopachs. Major structural or tectonic features associated with the creation of the successions, or with the enhancement or degradation of their hydrocarbon potential, are also shown. Forty-four (30.8%) of the successions are known to contain hydrocarbon accumulations, 64 (44.8%) are sufficiently thick to have generated hydrocarbons and 35 (24.5%) may be too thin to be prospective.

Geological Society Memoir↗

Geology and petroleum potential of the north and east margins of the Siberian Craton, north of the Arctic Circle

The Siberian Craton consists of crystalline rocks and superimposed Precambrian sedimentary rocks deposited in rift basins. Palaeozoic rocks, mainly carbonates, were deposited along the margins of the craton to form an outwardly younger concentric pattern that underlies an outward-thickening Mesozoic sedimentary section. The north and east margins of the Siberian Craton subsequently became foreland basins created by compressional deformation during collision with other tectonic plates. The Tunguska Basin developed as a Palaeozoic rift/sag basin over Proterozoic rifts. The geological provinces along the north and east margins of the Siberian Craton are immature with respect to exploration, so exploration-history analysis alone cannot be used for assessing undiscovered petroleum resources. Therefore, other areas from around the world having greater petroleum exploration maturity and similar geological characteristics, and which have been previously assessed, were used as analogues to aid in this assessment. The analogues included those of foreland basins and rift/sag basins that were later subjected to compression. The US Geological Survey estimated the mean undiscovered, technically recoverable conventional petroleum resources to be approximately 28 billion barrels of oil equivalent, including approximately 8 billion barrels of crude oil, 103 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 3 billion barrels of natural gas liquids.

Siberian Craton↗

Circum-Arctic mapping project: New magnetic and gravity anomaly maps of the Arctic

New Circum-Arctic maps of magnetic and gravity anomalies have been produced by merging regional gridded data. Satellite magnetic and gravity data were used for quality control of the long wavelengths of the new compilations. The new Circum-Arctic digital compilations of magnetic, gravity and some of their derivatives have been analyzed together with other freely available regional and global data and models in order to provide a consistent view of the tectonically complex Arctic basins and surrounding continents. Sharp, linear contrasts between deeply buried basement blocks with different magnetic properties and densities that can be identified on these maps can be used, together with other geological and geophysical information, to refine the tectonic boundaries of the Arctic domain.

Geological Society Memoir↗

Geology and petroleum potential of the Arctic Alaska petroleum province

The Arctic Alaska petroleum province encompasses all lands and adjacent continental shelf areas north of the Brooks Range–Herald Arch orogenic belt and south of the northern (outboard) margin of the Beaufort Rift shoulder. Even though only a small part is thoroughly explored, it is one of the most prolific petroleum provinces in North America with total known resources (cumulative production plus proved reserves) of c . 28 BBOE. The province constitutes a significant part of a displaced continental fragment, the Arctic Alaska microplate, that was probably rifted from the Canadian Arctic margin during formation of the Canada Basin. Petroleum prospective rocks in the province, mostly Mississippian and younger, record a sequential geological evolution through passive margin, rift and foreland basin tectonic stages. Significant petroleum source and reservoir rocks were formed during each tectonic stage but it was the foreland basin stage that provided the necessary burial heating to generate petroleum from the source rocks. The lion's share of known petroleum resources in the province occur in combination structural–stratigraphic traps formed as a consequence of rifting and located along the rift shoulder. Since the discovery of the super-giant Prudhoe Bay accumulation in one of these traps in the late 1960s, exploration activity preferentially focused on these types of traps. More recent activity, however, has emphasized the potential for stratigraphic traps and the prospect of a natural gas pipeline in this region has spurred renewed interest in structural traps. For assessment purposes, the province is divided into a Platform assessment unit (AU), comprising the Beaufort Rift shoulder and its relatively undeformed flanks, and a Fold-and-Thrust Belt AU, comprising the deformed area north of the Brooks Range and Herald Arch tectonic belt. Mean estimates of undiscovered, technically recoverable resources include nearly 28 billion barrels of oil (BBO) and 122 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of nonassociated gas in the Platform AU and 2 BBO and 59 TCF of nonassociated gas in the Fold-and-Thrust Belt AU.

Alaska↗

Geology and petroleum potential of the rifted margins of the Canada Basin

Three sides of the Canada Basin are bordered by high-standing, conjugate rift shoulders of the Chukchi Borderland, Alaska and Canada. The Alaska and Canada margins are mantled with thick, growth-faulted sediment prisms, and the Chukchi Borderland contains only a thin veneer of sediment. The rift-margin strata of Alaska and Canada reflect the tectonics and sediment dispersal systems of adjacent continental regions whereas the Chukchi Borderland was tectonically isolated from these sediment dispersal systems. Along the eastern Alaska–southern Canada margin, termed herein the ‘Canning–Mackenzie deformed margin’, the rifted margin is deformed by ongoing Brooks Range tectonism. Additional contractional structures occur in a gravity fold belt that may be present along the entire Alaska and Canada margins of the Canada Basin. Source-rock data inboard of the rift shoulders and regional palaeogeographic reconstructions suggest three potential source-rock intervals: Lower Cretaceous (Hauterivian–Albian), Upper Cretaceous (mostly Turonian) and Lower Palaeogene. Burial history modelling indicates favourable timing for generation from all three intervals beneath the Alaska and Canada passive margins, and an active petroleum system has been documented in the Canning–Mackenzie deformed margin. Assessment of undiscovered petroleum resources indicates the greatest potential in the Canning–Mackenzie deformed margin and significant potential in the Canada and Alaska passive margins.

Canada Basin↗