Search USGS⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search USGS

Results for “Quaternary”

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources
USGS2005

Paleontology of the upper Eocene to quaternary postimpact section in the USGS-NASA Langley core, Hampton, Virginia

The USGS-NASA Langley corehole was drilled in 2000 in Hampton, Va. The core serves as a benchmark for the study of calcareous nannofossils, dinoflagellates, diatoms and silico flagellates, mollusks, ostracodes, planktonic foraminifera and bolboformids, and vertebrate remains in the upper Eocene, Oligocene, Miocene, and Pliocene sediments in southeastern Virginia. These sediments were deposited after the comet or asteroid impact that produced the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. The Chickahominy Formation was deposited rapidly in outer neritic to upper bathyal marine environments during the last 2 million years of the late Eocene. The Drummonds Corner beds are newly recognized in the Langley core. These beds appear to represent shallower water or more nearshore deposition than the underlying Chickahominy deposits. Paleontology indicates an age in the later part of the early Oligocene, with a sharp floral and faunal break between the Drummonds Corner beds and the underlying Chickahominy Formation. Late Oligocene sedimentation is represented by the Old Church Formation. The record of early and middle Miocene deposition in the Langley core is incomplete. The Calvert Formation records brief episodes of deposition in three members, which are separated by unconformities and are called the informal Newport News beds, the Plum Point Member, and the Calvert Beach Member. A second episode of rapid deposition at the Langley site is preserved as the upper Miocene St. Marys and Eastover Formations. The Eastover is overlain unconformably by the Yorktown Formation, which is both late early and early late Pliocene. The highest unit, the Tabb Formation (Pleistocene), was not studied paleontologically. Continued movement along faults and fractures of the crater and nearby region may have enhanced the contributions of older material into the various units filling the Chesapeake Bay impact crater, as suggested by the conspicuous reworking of microfossils in many of the samples from the upper Eocene and younger units in the USGS-NASA Langley core.

Virginia↗
USGS2009

Quaternary uplift history of Wingham Island, south-central Alaska

Marine terraces cut into Pleistocene deposits on Wingham Island in the Gulf of Alaska provide new constraints on the position of sea level, ice thickness and total glacioisostatic rebound at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum. A radiocarbon age of 13.9 +- 0.15 ka on the most prominent terrace is coincident with the end of meltwater pulse 1A, possibly suggestive of a link between changes in relative sea level and terrace formation. Isostatic modeling suggests a local ice thickness of 600 to 700 m with high (~10 cm/yr) initial rates of postglacial rebound. In addition to the unique ties to meltwater pulse 1A, the timing of emergence for Wingham Island following the Last Glacial Maximum has implications for the early migration of humans into North America.

Alaska↗
USGS2010

Middle Jurassic through Quaternary metallogenesis and tectonics of northeast Asia, Chapter 8 in Metallogenesis and tectonics of northeast Asia

The major purposes of this chapter are to provide (1) an overview of the regional geology, tectonics, and metallogenesis of Northeast Asia for readers who are unfamiliar with the region, (2) a general scientific introduction to the succeeding chapters of this volume, and (3) an overview of the methodology of metallogenic and tectonic analysis used in this study. We also describe how a high-quality metallogenic and tectonic analysis, including construction of an associated metallogenic-tectonic model will greatly benefit other mineral resource studies, including synthesis of mineral-deposit models; improve prediction of undiscovered mineral deposit as part of a quantitative mineral-resource-assessment studies; assist land-use and mineral-exploration planning; improve interpretations of the origins of host rocks, mineral deposits, and metallogenic belts, and suggest new research. Research on the metallogenesis and tectonics of such major regions as Northeast Asia (eastern Russia, Mongolia, northern China, South Korea, and Japan) and the Circum-North Pacific (the Russian Far East, Alaska, and the Canadian Cordillera) requires a complex methodology including (1) definitions of key terms, (2) compilation of a regional geologic base map that can be interpreted according to modern tectonic concepts and definitions, (3) compilation of a mineral-deposit database that enables a determination of mineral-deposit models and clarification of the relations of deposits to host rocks and tectonic origins, (4) synthesis of a series of mineral-deposit models that characterize the known mineral deposits and inferred undiscovered deposits in the region, (5) compilation of a series of metallogenic-belt belts constructed on the regional geologic base map, and (6) construction of a unified metallogenic and tectonic model. The summary of regional geology and metallogenesis presented here is based on publications of the major international collaborative studies of the metallogenesis and tectonics of Northeast Asia that have been led by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). These studies have produced two broad types of publications (1) a series of regional geologic, mineral-deposit, and metallogenic-belt maps, with companion descriptions of the region, and (2) a suite of metallogenic and tectonic analyses of the same region. The study area consists of eastern Russia (most of eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East), Mongolia, northern China, South Korea, Japan, and adjacent offshore areas. The major cooperative agencies are the Russian Academy of Sciences; the Academy of Sciences of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia); VNIIOkeangeologia and Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation; the Mongolian Academy of Sciences; the Mongolian University of Science and Technology; the Mongolian National University; Jilin University, Changchun, People?s Republic of China, the China Geological Survey; the Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources; the Geological Survey of Japan/AIST; the University of Texas, Arlington, and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). This study builds on and extends the data and interpretations from a previous project on the Major Mineral Deposits, Metallogenesis, and Tectonics of the Russian Far East, Alaska, and the Canadian Cordillera conducted by the USGS, the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, and the Geological Survey of Canada. The major products of this project were summarized by Naumova and others (2006) and are described in appendix A.

Professional Paper↗
USGS2024

Temporal, spatial, and chemical evolution of Quaternary high-silica rhyolites in the Mineral Mountains, Utah

The Mineral Mountains in southwestern Utah are a structurally controlled core complex at the confluence of the Colorado Plateau and the Basin and Range physiographic provinces. Aside from hosting Utah’s largest batholith, the Mineral Mountains host some of the State’s youngest high-silica rhyolites, which have been linked to a magma source that is presently being utilized as an enhanced geothermal system. The high-silica rhyolites take the form of effusive lavas and domes, and explosive products are rare. Previous K-Ar dating of these Pleistocene rhyolites placed eruptions between about 790 and 500 kilo-annum (ka) with contemporaneous basalts erupting in the valley to the east of the Mineral Mountains. Large uncertainties on these ages obscured the tempo of eruptions and thus hindered attempts to constrain the timescales of the petrogenetic processes that produced the rhyolites. In this study, we build on previous studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s by using new geochronologic and geochemical data to investigate the temporal and spatial evolution of the youngest phase of volcanism in the Mineral Mountains. We identify two major eruptive periods, from approximately 850 to 750 ka and from approximately 590 to 480 ka. The older phase is characterized by the eruption of several basaltic lavas, two obsidian flows, and a series of coalescing porphyritic rhyolite domes. The younger phase included the eruption of six evolved high-silica rhyolite domes and one pyroclastic deposit, followed by the eruption of trachyandesite in the adjacent valley to the east. Whole-rock geochemical data indicate that the rhyolites can be divided into three chemical groups, with more evolved compositions erupting through time. The youngest rhyolites along the range crest have the lowest total iron and TiO 2 concentrations and the highest incompatible element concentrations, indicative of increasing differentiation with time and elevation. Improved precision on the eruption ages indicates a recurrence interval of approximately 20 thousand years. The eruptive flux for both periods of rhyolitic volcanism is about 0.01 cubic kilometers per thousand years, which is less than the magma resurgence flux rates for syn-caldera and post-caldera eruptions of the Valles Caldera and Yellowstone Caldera volcanic systems. Collectively, these geochemical, geochronological, and volumetric data may facilitate a better understanding of heat flux and the longevity of magmatic sources related to geothermal resources in similar small-volume, silicic systems.

Utah↗