[Book review] Photographing nature, by G.J.H. Moon
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search USGS
Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The book consists of species accounts of each species including, where information is available, such topics as overall distribution, Florida status, relative abundance, migration, haunts and habits, adverse factors, problems of identification, variation, references and a distribution map symbolically showing seasonal distribution records by county. The book also has an addendum of records in 1993-1994 and an extensive bibliography. Any faunistic treatment of Florida or study of the status of any Florida species will need to use the text as a starting point, although not necessarily an ending point. Those concerned with having the most solidly verified species list would be best advised to continue to use Robertson and Woolfenden's Annotated List and its successors. But for a compendium of information on the birds of this fascinating peninsula, one could do no better.
Birds have long been thought to have a poor sense of smell, although they have the proper anatomical and neurological structures for detecting olfactory cues ( Roper 1999 ). However, in the past decade several bird species have been shown to use smell in various contexts, such as foraging ( Nevitt et al. 1995 ), navigation ( Wallraff 2004 ), selection of nest materials ( Petit et al. 2002 , Gwinner & Berger 2008 ), nest location ( Bonadonna & Bretagnolle 2002 ), predator avoidance ( Amo et al. 2008 , Roth et al. 2008 ) and recognition of conspecifics ( Hagelin et al. 2003 ) or mates ( Bonadonna & Nevitt 2004 , for reviews see Roper 1999 , Hagelin & Jones 2007 , Nevitt 2008 ). The evidence, however, mainly concerns the Procellariiformes (petrels, shearwaters and albatrosses), a group that has long been suspected of using olfaction because of their strong body odour, highly developed olfactory bulb, nocturnal habits and burrow‐nesting ( Nevitt & Bonadonna 2005 , Nevitt 2008 ). Evidence of olfactory ability is scarce in other avian taxa. Exceptions include, for instance, Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura ( Smith & Paselk 1986 ), Brown Kiwi Apteryx australis ( Wenzel 1968 ), Homing Pigeon Columba livia ( Wallraff 2004 ), Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus ( Petit et al. 2002 , Amo et al. 2008 ), Domestic Fowl Gallus domesticus ( McKeegan et al. 2005 ), Kakapo Strigops habroptilus ( Hagelin 2004 ), Yellow‐backed Chattering Lory Lorius garrulus flavopalliatus ( Roper 2003 ), African Penguin Spheniscus demersus ( Cunningham et al. 2008 ) and Crested Auklets Aethia cristatella ( Hagelin et al. 2003 ). The Laridae, including Black‐legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla , are diurnal, have relatively small olfactory bulbs ( Bang & Cobb 1968 ) and do not appear to use olfaction to locate food ( Frings et al. 1955 , Lequette et al. 1989 , Verheyden & Jouventin 1994 ). Kittiwakes use vocal cues in mate and parent/offspring recognition ( Wooller 1978 , Mulard & Danchin 2008 ), suggesting that olfaction may be at best secondary in those contexts. However, mates commonly allopreen, potentially exposing them to their mate’s chemical compounds. Moreover, the relative size of the olfactory bulb may be a poor predictor of olfactory abilities ( Hagelin 2004 , Mennerat et al. 2005 ). The aim of this experimental study was to assess whether Black‐legged Kittiwakes are able to detect odours added to the nest.