Search USGSSearch

SEARCH · Search USGS

Search Search USGS

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sand provenance boundary in the Mu Us Sandy Land of northern China

Desert dunes are often assumed to have uniform mineral compositions due to extensive mixing during lateral transport, which complicates provenance studies. The Mu Us Sandy Land in north-central China, near the East Asian summer monsoon precipitation boundary, experiences a wetter climate than most deserts. Climate wetting as a result of a warming climate, and the ‘Sand Control Project’ implemented by the Chinese government to decrease the lateral movement of sand dunes in this area provide an opportunity to study surface processes of sand production and transport. Previous studies using zircon U Pb geochronology and heavy mineral composition indicate distinct sand sources for the Mu Us Sandy Land: local basement-derived middle Yellow River sediments and recycled dried-up lacustrine sediments for the eastern part, and northeastern Tibetan Plateau-derived upper Yellow River sediments for the western part. However, zircons and heavy minerals only represent trace amounts of the bulk mineralogy within a sand dune, so broader provenance analysis targeting common minerals is essential. We focus on the area near the proposed provenance difference boundary between the western and eastern Mu Us Sandy Land, using comprehensive sampling and provenance techniques to confirm distinct provenance characteristics and delineate the provenance boundary. Our findings reveal that sand from most of the Mu Us Sandy Land originated from the erosion of local basement by the middle Yellow River and recycled local dried-up lacustrine sediments, whereas the southwestern corner and the neighboring western-central Chinese Loess Plateau received sediments from the distal northeastern Tibetan Plateau.

Mu Us Sandy Land

Changes in soil erosion caused by wildfire: A conceptual biogeographic model

Soil erosion rates after wildfire are strongly controlled by intrinsic properties such as topography, weather, climate, soil, and vegetation. These landscape and hydroclimatic properties are important in determining post-fire erosion rates; however, their influence on post-fire erosion and their interaction with the intensity of a wildfire remains uncertain. A key limitation in resolving this uncertainty is the lack of conceptual models and frameworks for organising data related to the geomorphic sensitivity of landscapes to wildfire. Our aim is to develop a framework for consolidating understanding of post-fire erosion in the context of hydroclimatic conditions which contribute to system states, for example soil and vegetation properties, and wildfire regime. The framework is developed around a simple conceptual model where the change in erosion due to wildfire is a product of change in runoff generation and sediment supply, which is strongly related to landscape net primary productivity (NPP). We hypothesised that geomorphic sensitivity to wildfire should vary as a unimodal humped relationship across a gradient of NPP, peaking at an intermediate level. To develop this framework and to test the hypothesis, we first review intrinsic soil and vegetation properties related to the supply and transport of sediment from burned and unburned hillslopes. Net primary productivity is systematically related to these intrinsic properties because it integrates many processes involved in soil and vegetation development. Empirical data indicate a trend in the change in surface runoff generation with NPP after wildfire, peaking at an NPP of approximately 15 Mg C ha −1 y −1 . A simple model of fuel availability and soil heating are correlated with a similar “humped” trend in sediment supply. These results are consistent with our conceptual model, which indicates that sediment supply and runoff contribute towards a distinct peak in wildfire effects on erosion at an intermediate level of NPP. We propose that landscapes of intermediate NPP typically have the highest quantity of fuel available to burn, which cause large changes to the soil surface properties. Landscapes at intermediate NPP also tend to produce intrinsic soil and vegetation properties that promote erosion after wildfire. The interplay between these short and long-term landscape characteristics is strongest at intermediate levels of NPP. Our proposed biogeographic model of geomorphic sensitivity to wildfire was supported by erosion data from burned hillslope and zero-order catchments studies from a range fire-prone landscapes in Australia and North America. Our proposed conceptual model will help identify areas most vulnerable to post-fire erosion changes.

Geomorphology