Geologic and hydrologic control of chloride contamination in aquifers at Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia

Dean O. Gregg; Everett Alfred Zimmerman

doi:10.3133/wsp2029d

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · wsp2029D

Geologic and hydrologic control of chloride contamination in aquifers at Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia

Dean O. Gregg·Everett Alfred Zimmerman

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Water from a brackish-water zone (1,050-1,350 ft) has concentrations as high as 2,150 milligrams per liter chloride, and concentrations are suspected to be higher than 3,000 milligrams per liter chloride. This brackish water has been identified as the source of the water that contaminates the upper and lower fresh-water-bearing zones of the principal artesian aquifer. The confining unit separating the fresh and brackish water seems to contain breaks that act as vertical conduits for the movement of brackish water into the fresh-water zones of the aquifer. Faults are suspected to be responsible for the breaks in the confining unit. The rate of upward movement of brackish water seems to be a function of the rate of water-level decline in the aquifer. There are two main areas of brackish-water intrusion. One area is near Bay and Prince Streets, and the other area is near Reynolds and Q Streets. Successive maps showing chloride ion concentration trace the movement of the chloride front northward in the Bay Street area at the rate of about 350 feet per year toward the center of pumping. An average of about 400 gallons per minute of water containing 2,000 milligrams per liter chloride invaded the upper water-bearing zone between December 1962 and December 1966. A like amount may have entered the lower water-bearing zone. Maximum chloride concentration in the upper water-bearing zone is 1,540 milligrams per liter in the Bay Street area and 640 milligrams per liter in the Reynolds Street area. In a few areas, where individual wells have been drilled deep enough to penetrate the confining unit over the brackish-water zone, the well furnishes a conduit for brackish water to recharge the fresh-water aquifer. Plugging the lower part of these wells usually reduces the chloride concentration of the water. The chloride concentration of water in the principal artesian aquifer can probably be reduced by use of interceptor wells, relief wells, or well-field spacing. Interceptor wells would prevent laterally moving brackish water from contaminating a well field. A relief well would tap and withdraw poor quality water from only the brackish-water zone to lower the head in that zone and decrease the rate of leakage into the fresh-water aquifer. Wider spacing of wells would prevent the development of a deep cone of depression and the steeper hydraulic gradients that accompany it. The brackish water pumped by the interceptor or relief wells could be used for industry, aquaculture, recreation, or for other processes in which the chloride content is not critical.

Explore related subjects

Water Supply Paper Report

Source-reported bounding extent: 31.00703996512886° to 31.451510735858978° latitude; -81.78497314453125° to -81.26930236816406° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Dean O. Gregg, Everett Alfred Zimmerman. 1974. Geologic and hydrologic control of chloride contamination in aquifers at Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2029d

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2004

Basic ground-water hydrology

Ground water is one of the Nation's most valuable natural resources. It is the source of about 40 percent of the water used for all purposes exclusive of hydropower generation and electric powerplant cooling. Surprisingly, for a resource that is so widely used and so important to the health and to the economy of the country, the occurrence of ground water is not only poorly understood but is also, in fact, the subject of many widespread misconceptions. Common misconceptions include the belief that ground water occurs in underground rivers resembling surface streams whose presence can be detected by certain individuals. These misconceptions and others have hampered the development and conservation of ground water and have adversely affected the protection of its quality. In order for the Nation to receive maximum benefit from its ground-water resource, it is essential that everyone, from the rural homeowner to managers of industrial and municipal water supplies to heads of Federal and State water-regulatory agencies, become more knowledgeable about the occurrence, development, and protection of ground water. This report has been prepared to help meet the needs of these groups, as well as the needs of hydrologists, well drillers, and others engaged in the study and development of ground-water supplies. It consists of 45 sections on the basic elements of ground-water hydrology, arranged in order from the most basic aspects of the subject through a discussion of the methods used to determine the yield of aquifers to a discussion of common problems encountered in the operation of ground-water supplies. Each section consists of a brief text and one or more drawings or maps that illustrate the main points covered in the text. Because the text is, in effect, an expanded discussion of the illustrations, most of the illustrations are not captioned. However, where more than one drawing is included in a section, each drawing is assigned a number, given in parentheses, and these numbers are inserted at places in the text where the reader should refer to the drawing. In accordance with U.S. Geological Survey policy to encourage the use of metric units, these units are used in most sections. In the sections dealing with the analysis of aquifer (pumping) test data, equations are given in both consistent units and in the inconsistent inch-pound units still in relatively common use among ground-water hydrologists and well drillers. As an aid to those who are not familiar with metric units and with the conversion of ground-water hydraulic units from inch-pound units to metric units, conversion tables are given on the inside back cover. Definitions of ground-water terms are given where the terms are first introduced. Because some of these terms will be new to many readers, abbreviated definitions are also given on the inside front cover for convenient reference by those who wish to review the definitions from time to time as they read the text. Finally, for those who need to review some of the simple mathematical operations that are used in ground-water hydrology, a section on numbers, equations, and conversions is included at the end of the text.

Water Supply Paper↗

USGS2002

Use of stable isotopes of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur to identify sources of nitrogen in surface waters in the Lower Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania

Samples of nitrogen-source material, soil, and water were collected from several small, primarily single-source subbasins in the Lower Susquehanna River Basin during 1988–90 to determine the feasibility of using measurements of stable isotope ratios of carbon ( 13 C), nitrogen ( 15 N), and sulfur ( 34 S) to identify sources of nitrogen (N) in stream water. Chemical and isotopic compositions were measured for six N-source types consisting of rain water, forest leaf litter, synthetic fertilizer, farm-animal manure, municipal-sewage effluent and sludge, and septictank effluent and sludge. Compositions of associated, nearby samples of topsoil, subsoil, runoff water, and stream water were measured to evaluate changes in compositions of transported N-containing materials near the N source. Animal manure, human waste (sewage plus septic), and forest-leaf litter can be distinguished on the basis of 13 C; however, most N-sources cannot be distinguished on the basis of 15 N and 34 S, owing to wide ranges and overlap of compositions among different N-source types. Although values of 15 N for soil and runoff-water samples are qualitatively similar to those of the applied N source, values of 13 C and 34 S for runoff-water and stream-water samples appear to reflect the compositions of relatively large reservoirs of the elements in soil organic matter and minerals, respectively, and not the composition of the applied N source. The ratio of organic carbon to total nitrogen (C-org:N), combined with 13 C, is useful for distinguishing agricultural soils, which have characteristically high 13 C and low C-org:N, from forested soils. The C-org:N values of suspended particulates in runoff or stream waters generally are lower than those of nearby soils, however, and indicate that chemical transformations and resultant isotopic fractionation can be important controls on the compositions of N-containing compounds in the soil and water. In aqueous samples including surface water and liquid N-sources, isotopic ratios commonly differ between coexisting dissolved fractions of NO 3- N and NH 3- N and between dissolved and particulate fractions of N or S, probably because of isotopic fractionation during transport or N-source processing. Isotopic measurements provide qualitative information about important reactions that can affect N concentrations in surface waters. However, mass-balance computations generally are not sufficiently accurate to estimate the proportions of multiple sources contributing to the N load in the streams studied because of (1) variations in source chemical and isotopic compositions and (2) nonconservative behavior and fractionation during transport over short distances (hundreds of meters). Uncertainties in mass-balance computations are complicated by the propagation of errors associated with measurements of discharge, chemical concentrations,and isotopic compositions of relatively dilute, small streams.

Pennsylvania↗

USGS2001

Validation of a numerical modeling method for simulating rainfall-runoff relations for headwater basins in western King and Snohomish Counties, Washington

The validity of a previously determined numerical modeling method was assessed. Numerical models for 11 drainage basins were constructed with the Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF) with parameter values that were generalized for the physiographic region. Large and recurrent simulation errors were initially identified, but three systematic modifications of the models corrected those errors for 10 out of the 11 basins. The validity of the numerical modeling method for simulating rainfall-runoff relations in the study area, as modified during this investigation, was not rejected, but observed streamflow data were needed to apply the method.

Water Supply Paper↗