Search USGSSearch

USGS · sir20265118

Groundwater budget for the Mountain Home area, southern Idaho, 2022–23

Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey, with funding from the Idaho Department of Water Resources, developed a groundwater budget for the Mountain Home area in southern Idaho for irrigation year 2023 (November 1, 2022–October 31, 2023). This study focused on the water balance across the Cinder Cone Butte Critical Groundwater Area (CGWA), Mountain Home Groundwater Management Area (GWMA), and the rest of the study area (RoSA), compiling data from various sources, including precipitation records, groundwater level measurements, metered groundwater pumpage data, surface water diversions and evapotranspiration (ET) estimates derived from remote sensing satellite imagery, and ground-based reference data. Key inflow components included recharge from applied surface water irrigation (which incorporates incidental recharge from irrigation practices and conveyance losses), estimated tributary streamflow, and estimated mountain block recharge. The key outflow components were groundwater pumpage for irrigation, municipal, industrial, and domestic uses, and ET. Recharge from applied irrigation and mountain block recharge were the largest inflows, and groundwater pumpage for irrigation was the largest outflow. The CGWA had a positive groundwater budget residual of 2,170 acre-feet (acre-ft), which contrasts with observed long-term groundwater level declines and historical trends of storage depletion. This positive residual is likely associated with unquantified outflows, including lateral groundwater flow out of the subregion, or other complexities, such as overestimated tributary contributions relative to the actual recharge for the 2023 water budget. The GWMA exhibited a positive residual of 56,563 acre-ft, primarily owing to recharge from applied surface water irrigation and areal recharge during a wetter-than-average year, which allowed irrigation entities to deliver more water from in-basin and out-of-basin reservoirs. The RoSA showed a large positive residual of 124,933 acre-ft. The interpretation of these positive residuals must account for significant uncertainties, including estimations of areal recharge, tributary streamflow (particularly losses and diversions), ET, the volume of surface water loss to the Snake River, lateral groundwater flows between subregions and across study area boundaries, and the unquantified groundwater discharge to the Snake River. These uncertainties, in combination with the complex hydrogeologic controls on water movement and limitations of remotely sensed data, directly affect the accuracy of water availability assessments. Future data collection efforts would help reduce these uncertainties and support water resource management decisions in the Mountain Home area. Key efforts could include installing additional streamflow gaging stations (particularly to quantify tributary losses and gains and surface water losses to the Snake River), improving groundwater pumpage metering, and validating remotely sensed ET data with ground-based measurements. Furthermore, to better quantify unrepresented or highly uncertain fluxes, focused investigations on groundwater discharge to the Snake River, lateral groundwater flows between subregions and across study area boundaries, and a more robust determination of the actual influence and volume of mountain block recharge would help refine future water availability assessments for the Mountain Home area.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 42.833° to 43.5° latitude; -116.5° to -115.0833° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paul M. Thomas. 2026-02-26. Groundwater budget for the Mountain Home area, southern Idaho, 2022–23. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20265118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Methodology for quantitative spatial sensitivity analysis of volcanic geodetic networks

Introduction This report introduces a methodology for assessing the state of the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Observatories’ geodetic monitoring networks that measure how volcanoes deform or change shape. This new method uses a model-based approach that considers the uniqueness of the instrument environments at each volcano. This report focuses on simplified volcanic sources, is independent of the shape or size of the volcano, or the network geometry, and thus highlights the strengths and potential vulnerabilities of each volcano’s geodetic network in an actionable visual format. This analysis can help observatories to make informed decisions about whether volcanoes have an adequate level of geodetic monitoring and indicate where improvements are needed.

Lassen Peak, Mount Shasta

2023 Earthquake Ground-Motion Workshop for the Central and Eastern United States, with a focus on the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plains—Agenda and abstracts

The U.S. Geological Survey held a virtual workshop December 7–8, 2023, to share research and ideas about earthquake ground motions in the Central and Eastern United States, with a focus on the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. The workshop was organized to learn about potential regionalization of ground-motion characteristics (source, path, and site), consider new explanatory variables for site response, and hear and discuss updates on ground-motion research on the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. The workshop was organized into a series of contributed presentations and three panel discussions held during 2 days. This report documents the agenda, contributed abstracts, and panel summaries.

Scientific Investigations Report

A model uncertainty quantification protocol for evaluating the value of observation data

The history-matching approach to parameter estimation with models enables a powerful offshoot analysis of data worth—using the uncertainty of a model forecast as a metric for the worth of data. Adding observation data will either have no impact on forecast uncertainty or will reduce it. Removing existing data will either have no impact on forecast uncertainty or will increase it. The history-matching framework makes it possible to perform this quantitative analysis leveraging the connections among observations, model parameters, and model forecasts. We show this behavior on a specific groundwater flow model of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain and show where the analysis can be informative for considering the potential design of an observation network based on existing or potential observations.

Scientific Investigations Report