Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · sir20265067

Water depth fluctuations and water chemistry in five ephemeral rock pools (tinajas), Clark County, Nevada, 2021–23

Abstract

Southern Nevada is characterized by an arid climate with limited perennial water resources. In this environment, rock pools (tinajas) are both a habitat and drinking water source for wildlife. In this reconnaissance-level project, the U.S. Geological Survey studied the water depth and water chemistry at five tinajas in Clark County, Nevada. The tinaja sites in this study are representative of the dominant plunge pool morphology and the sandstone or carbonate bedrock substrates that characterize tinajas in the region. Continuous water depth measurements at four tinajas between December 2021 and December 2023 indicated that tinajas may contain water for weeks to months after being recharged but are not a permanent drinking water source for wildlife. Tinajas were driest between April and August 2022, before the beginning of the monsoon season. Chemical analysis of select nutrients, major ions, metals, and trace elements from five tinajas detected concentrations below limits established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for aquatic life and drinking water.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 35.8386363° to 37° latitude; -116.5° to -114.1620331° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Joshua M. Gonzales, Katherine J. Earp. 2026-10-01. Water depth fluctuations and water chemistry in five ephemeral rock pools (tinajas), Clark County, Nevada, 2021–23. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20265067

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Updates to the Lake Washington Ship Canal and Ballard Locks model, Seattle, Washington, 2016–20

The Hiram M. Chittenden Locks (Ballard Locks or Locks) and Lake Washington Ship Canal connect freshwater Lake Washington with saline Shilshole Bay of Puget Sound. The Locks are operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and serve commercial and recreational vessels. Anadromous salmonids migrate through the canal by making use of a fish ladder at the Locks. To help understand canal hydrodynamics, water temperature, and salinity, a two-dimensional model (CE-QUAL-W2) of the Locks and Lake Washington Ship Canal was constructed by WEST Consultants, Inc. In cooperation with USACE, the U.S. Geological Survey reviewed and updated this model and documentation. The review, published previously, recognized the strengths of the model and suggested some modifications and updates. This report documents these modifications, reports on sensitivity testing, describes model recalibration, and reports model results for calendar years 2016–20. Modeled water velocity was less than 0.2 meter per second at most sites and depths; velocity was greater nearer the Locks. Water age, which estimates residence time, was greatest during September and October. Water temperature was greater near-surface and cooler near the channel bottom at some times and locations. The model also simulated the inflow of lower-salinity waters from Lake Washington and the import of higher-salinity waters from the Locks.

Washington↗

Flood-inundation maps for Río Grande de Arecibo in and near Utuado Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2026

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) created digital flood-inundation maps for a 3.4-mile reach of Río Grande de Arecibo in the municipality of Utuado Municipio, Puerto Rico. Water-surface profiles were computed for the stream reach by using a one-dimensional, steady-state, step-backwater model. This model was calibrated to the current (2026) stage-streamflow relation (rating curve number 11.0) for the USGS streamgage 50024950, Río Grande de Arecibo below Utuado, Puerto Rico. The resulting hydraulic model was used to compute 11 water-surface profiles for water levels (flood stages) ranging from 14.00 to 34.00 feet at the streamgage and ranging from what are referred to as “minor flood stage” to above “major flood stage,” as reported by the National Weather Service. The 34.00-foot stage exceeds the peak stage (32.92 feet) recorded at this streamgage in 1998. The simulated water-surface profiles were used in combination with a digital elevation model derived from lidar data to map the inundated areas associated with each flood profile. The flood-inundation maps and the supporting hydraulic model produced by this study can be used by emergency managers and local officials to define flood hazard areas and assess flood mitigation strategies to help protect life and property, to coordinate flood response activities such as evacuations and road closures, and to aid post-flood recovery efforts. Information about map limitations, associated uncertainties, and how to view the maps and access the associated data online is included in this report.

Puerto Rico↗

Magnitude and frequency of urban floods in Alabama and Mississippi using data through the 2024 water year

To improve flood-frequency estimates for urban streams in Alabama and Mississippi, the U.S Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Alabama and Mississippi Departments of Transportation, estimated streamflows corresponding to selected annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs) for 64 streamgages on urban streams in the two States—48 in Alabama and 16 in Mississippi. Using estimates from 42 of the 64 streamgages, regression equations were developed that can be used to predict streamflows corresponding to the selected AEPs at ungaged locations on urban streams. Annual peak-flow data through September 2024 were used in the at-site flood-frequency analyses. Drainage area and the percentage of developed land use in the drainage basins of the streamgages (from the 2011 National Land Cover Database) were identified as statistically significant explanatory variables. Pseudo coefficient of determination (pseudo-R2) values ranged from 81 percent for the 0.2-percent AEP (500-year flood) to 91 percent for the 4- and 2-percent AEPs (25- and 50-year floods, respectively). Standard errors of prediction ranged from 23.1 percent for the 4-percent AEP (25-year flood) to 36.1 percent for the 2-percent AEP (500-year flood).

Alabama, Mississippi↗