Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · sir20215053

Analysis of Escherichia coli, total recoverable iron, and dissolved selenium concentrations, loading, and identifying data gaps for selected 303(d) listed streams, Grand Valley, western Colorado, 1980–2018

Abstract

Tributaries to the Colorado River in the Grand Valley in western Colorado (segment COLCLC13b) have been placed on the State of Colorado 303(d) list as impaired for Escherichia coli (E. coli) , total recoverable iron, and dissolved selenium. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division is required to develop total maximum daily loads for these constituents in these tributaries. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Grand Valley Drainage District and Colorado Water Conservation Board, conducted a study to (1) characterize concentrations, loads, and load reductions for E. coli , total recoverable iron, and dissolved selenium using existing data and (2) identify water-quality data gaps to inform future monitoring strategies. This study analyzed water-quality and streamflow data for 3 main-stem sites (2 sites along the Colorado River and 1 site along the Gunnison River) and 29 selected sites on tributaries to the Colorado River. Sample data were available at five sites along Adobe Creek and at six sites along Leach Creek, the two tributaries in the study area that are impaired for E. coli . All geometric mean E. coli concentrations at sites along Adobe Creek and Leach Creek exceeded the State recreational use standard of 126 colony forming units per 100 milliliters (CFU/100 mL). In Adobe Creek, E. coli concentrations in samples ranged from 45.7 to more than 2,420 CFU/100 mL (method upper reporting limit for undiluted samples), and geometric mean concentrations at sites ranged from 301 to 1,180 CFU/100 mL. The E. coli concentrations generally increased in the downstream direction in Adobe Creek; however, increases were not seen between all sites. The largest downstream increase in E. coli concentration was measured between the two most upstream sites. In Leach Creek, concentrations of E. coli in samples ranged from 25.9 to more than 2,420 CFU/100 mL, and geometric mean concentrations at sites ranged from 160 to 259 CFU/100 mL. The E. coli concentrations showed no consistent downgradient increase in Leach Creek. In fact, some of the highest E. coli concentrations were measured at the most upstream site, Leach Creek at Summer Hill Drive. Total recoverable iron concentrations and loads were evaluated at 15 tributary sites for samples collected from August 1993 to February 2018. Median total recoverable iron concentrations ranged from 211 to 4,670 micrograms per liter (µg/L). The chronic aquatic-life water-quality standard (1,000 µg/L) was exceeded in most irrigation season (April through October) samples but was rarely exceeded in nonirrigation season (November through March) samples. Concentrations were often an order of magnitude higher in samples collected during irrigation season than in samples collected during nonirrigation season. None of the sites had enough concurrent total recoverable iron and streamflow data to compute annual loads. As with E. coli , the lack of concurrent total recoverable iron and streamflow information represents a data gap, which needs to be addressed to compute annual loads. Dissolved selenium concentrations and loads were evaluated at 20 tributary sites using discrete water-quality data collected 1991–2018. Dissolved selenium concentrations were higher during nonirrigation season than during irrigation season at tributary sites. However, irrigation season dissolved selenium loads were generally higher than nonirrigation selenium loads, because streamflows were higher during irrigation season. Regression analysis was used to estimate daily dissolved selenium concentrations and loads at three main-stem sites for water years (WYs) 1980–2018 (Gunnison River near Grand Junction and Colorado River near Colorado-Utah State Line) and WYs 2002–18 (Colorado River near Cameo). A trend analysis of dissolved selenium concentrations and loads was completed for these sites from the same respective starting dates but ending in 2017. A continuing downward trend in dissolved selenium concentration was observed at all sites and across all seasonal designations of the analysis. The dissolved selenium concentration decreased by 0.12 µg/L from WY 2002 to 2017 at Colorado River near Cameo, representing an 18-percent decrease during the time period. The dissolved selenium concentration at Gunnison River near Grand Junction decreased by 4.2 µg/L from WY 1980 to 2017, representing a 56-percent decrease overall. During the same time period, dissolved selenium concentration at Colorado River near Colorado-Utah State Line decreased by 3.8 µg/L, representing a 56-percent decrease overall. A downward trend in dissolved selenium load was also observed at all sites and across all seasonal designations of the analysis. The relative contribution of dissolved selenium from the Grand Valley near Grand Junction was estimated by comparing loads at main-stem sites bracketing the study area. The two upstream sites, Colorado River near Cameo and Gunnison River near Grand Junction, contributed 60,300 cumulative pounds and 251,000 cumulative pounds, respectively, during WYs 2002–18. At the furthest downstream site, Colorado River near Colorado-Utah State Line, 490,000 cumulative pounds were estimated during the same time period, indicating that the region between Whitewater and State line contributed approximately 179,000 cumulative pounds or a mean annual load of 10,500 lb/yr. Grand Valley dissolved selenium contributions appear to be stable during WYs 2002–18.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 38.736946065676° to 39.470125122358176° latitude; -109.083251953125° to -107.99560546875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lisa D. Miller, Rachel G. Gidley, Natalie K. Day, Judith C. Thomas. 2021-06-09. Analysis of Escherichia coli, total recoverable iron, and dissolved selenium concentrations, loading, and identifying data gaps for selected 303(d) listed streams, Grand Valley, western Colorado, 1980–2018. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215053

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Baseline water-quality inventory and summary for the Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park, New Jersey

The Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park (PAGR), established in 2011 in the City of Paterson, New Jersey, contains many cultural, historical, and natural resources. Because of the PAGR’s young age and limited resources, a long record of natural resource data is not available for use to guide future park management and planning decisions. A detailed natural resource inventory was identified as an immediate need in the “Foundation Document—Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park,” given the history of extensive industrial activity throughout the PAGR and the Passaic River Basin. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the National Park Service and the Urban Waters Federal Partnership for the Lower Passaic River, inventoried water-quality monitoring efforts and compiled historical water-quality data from secondary data sources to define baseline conditions in the PAGR and the surrounding study area. This report documents the methods used to harmonize water-quality data aggregated from multiple sources for the PAGR study area. Procedures implemented during data harmonization include compiling data from multiple sources, assessing the dataset for completeness, addressing metadata concerns, and creating a consistent and quality-assured dataset for future analysis. The harmonized dataset contains 14 aggregated surface-water sites, 1,103 individual sampling days, and 32,000 water-quality records throughout the period of record defined for this study (1952–2021). Summary statistics and comparison to water-quality criteria are provided for focus parameters that can support PAGR management, including field properties, suspended material, total dissolved solids, specific conductance, chloride, sulfate, Escherichia coli, nutrients, contaminants of concern related to fish consumption advisories, and litter and floatable debris. A spatial data gap was identified for the recreational area near the base of the Great Falls and immediately downstream from a known combined sewer overflow discharge location. Analytic data gaps were identified for continuous streamflow and water-quality parameters, floatable debris characterization, and harmful algal blooms identification. Continuous collection of contaminants of concern was identified as a temporal data gap, as these parameters were not consistently collected within the study area. The water-quality data synthesis and summary presented in this report can assist PAGR staff in understanding the complex baseline water resources within the study area and can serve as a baseline to design future water-quality monitoring efforts and evaluate changes in water quality over time. The harmonized dataset, as well as future New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and New Jersey Harbor Discharge Group monitoring data and assessments, can also be used to examine the status and trends in surface-water quality, support compliance with the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), and further investigate changes to park water resources that can affect ecological and human health.

New Jersey↗

Slip tendency and dilation tendency of Quaternary faults in the Great Basin region, Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming

This report presents the results of slip tendency and dilation tendency analysis of Quaternary faults in the Great Basin region, in the states of Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. This effort was undertaken as part of two studies: the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office-funded Innovative Geothermal Exploration through Novel Investigations of Undiscovered Systems (INGENIOUS) project, which is a multidisciplinary, multi-institution effort to develop new methodologies and best practices to accelerate the discovery of new, commercially viable hydrothermal resources; and the U.S. Geological Survey Geothermal Resources Investigations Project. The goal of this work is to identify faults and fault segments that are appropriately oriented to be stress-loaded for slip or to dilate under the ambient stress conditions. Both conditions may make such faults more likely to host permeability and fluid flow relative to other faults in the region. Slip tendency and dilation tendency were calculated for all fault segments in the study area from the U.S. Geological Survey Quaternary Fault and Fold Database. Results demonstrate that faults with high slip tendency and dilation tendency are common in the Great Basin region. The areas containing many high slip tendency and dilation tendency fault segments are associated with high strain rates. These areas also host a relatively high proportion of the known hydrothermal systems. This indicates that faults with high slip tendency and dilation tendency in areas with high strain-rate are potentially most prospective for hosting hydrothermal systems. The database published in coordination with this report contains the slip tendency and dilation tendency results data, including the fault geometry and stress data used to calculate these quantities, for both the Great Basin study area and the smaller INGENIOUS study area.

Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, ↗

A spatial analysis of the groundwater emergence flood hazard in Long Island, New York, and coastal areas surrounding Long Island Sound in New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island

Long Island, New York, and nearby coastal areas surrounding Long Island Sound are densely populated and, like other coastal areas, are susceptible to flooding from several potential sources, including stormwater from precipitation events, tidal flooding and storm surge, and groundwater emergence flooding. Groundwater emergence fooding refers to the intersection of a rising water table with land surface or critical infrastructure. Many studies of flood drivers either neglect or only briefly discuss how shallow groundwater conditions may contribute to or exacerbate flood conditions. As a part of a comprehensive study of compound flood hazards in the coastal areas of Long Island and Long Island Sound, a spatial analysis was completed by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Long Island Sound Partnership, formerly called the Long Island Sound Study, using available regional datasets to characterize the potential hazard for groundwater emergence flooding. The approximately 3,100 square mile study area was subdivided into 11,407 grid cells that were 900 meters by 900 meters (approximately 3,000 feet by 3,000 feet), for the purpose of integrating the spatial datasets to calculate and map the groundwater emergence flood hazard. The depth to the water table, hydrologic soil groups, and National Land Cover Database were harmonized to the common grid. A groundwater emergence flood hazard score was calculated for each grid cell for current average conditions following a set of rules accounting for the depth to the water table and the percentage of area within each cell with slow infiltrating soils. A scenario with a higher sea-level position was also calculated for the Long Island part of the study area. The calculated groundwater emergence flood hazard score was reviewed in conjunction with the National Land Cover Database to identify developed areas and associated infrastructure that may be at risk of potential groundwater emergence flooding. Study results indicate that the groundwater emergence flood hazard is highest in coastal areas and near surface water where the water table is close to ground surface. Inland areas away from surface waterbodies are not likely to be exposed to groundwater emergence flooding. For Long Island, in the scenario with higher sea-level position, a greater groundwater emergence flood hazard is calculated for some locations closer to the coast and where land is submerged. Away from the coast and surface-water drainage, the groundwater emergence flood hazard is similar between the current average sea-level condition and the higher sea-level position scenario.

Connecticut, New York, Rhode Island↗