Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · ofr7871

Water-quality assessment of the Middle Fork Anderson River watershed, Crawford and Perry counties, Indiana

Abstract

Surface-water quality in the watershed is generally good except for problem-causing concentrations of bacteria, dissolved oxygen, and phosphorus at some sites along the main stem during low flow and manganese at most sites year-round. Dissolved-solids concentration ranged from 76 to 248 milligrams per liter. Concentrations at sites upstream from reservoirs were greater than those at sites downstream during medium and low flows, but concentrations at sites upstream and downstream were similar during high flow. Calcium and bicarbonate ions were dominant at most sites during low flows, whereas these ions were codominant with magnesium and sulfate at most sites during high flows. Dissolved-oxygen concentration ranged from 2.1 to 11.6 milligrams per liter or from 21 to 124 percent of saturation. Low concentrations were associated with the main stem of the river during low flows when sluggish, pooled conditions prevailed. Concentrations of certain inorganic constituents (including nutrients) were as follows: Dissolved-manganese concentration ranged from 0.02 to 7.3 milligrams per liter. The concentrations were generally higher at sites downstream from reservoirs than at sites upstream and was greater than the problem-causing level 0.05 milligrams per liter at most sites. The high manganese concentrations are probably associated with organic acids in the streams. Dissolved-nitrate concentration (as nitrogen) ranged from 0.03 to 3.3 milligrams per liter, the highest concentrations occurring during winter and spring in drainage from areas of the most intense cultivation. Dissolved-phosphorus concentrations were typically 0.03 milligrams per liter or less, except at one site in September 1975, when the concentration was 0.12 milligrams per liter, and at three sites in July 1976, when concentrations were 0.12, 0.41, and 0.58 milligrams per liter. Chlorinated hydrocarbons were detected in bed material from two of the three sites sampled. Two micrograms or less per kilogram aldrin, DDT, DDD, DDE, dieldrin, and (or) chlordane and as much as 15 micrograms per kilogram PCB compounds were detected. Suspended-sediment concentration ranged from 1 to 148 milligrams per liter. Concentrations in two sites downstream from reservoirs were higher for medium and low flows and, despite large changes in flow, were considerably more consistent than the concentrations at two sites unaffected by reservoirs. Concentrations of fecal-coliform and fecal-streptococcal bacteria ranged from 5 to 9,900 and from 10 to 15,000 colonies per 100 milliliters, respectively. Source of high counts (more than 2,000 colonies per 100 milliliters) is probably livestock upstream from sampling sites. Diversity indices (genera level) 2.7 and 2.5 at the two sites sampled for benthic invertebrates indicate healthy biologic communities at both sites. Diversity indices (genera level) of the phytoplankton populations at seven sites ranged from 1.4 to 3.3. The phytoplankton populations were generally well balanced except for stressed communities at two mainstem sites during the September sampling.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 37.8402° to 38.4225° latitude; -86.8206° to -86.2458° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark A. Ayers. 1978. Water-quality assessment of the Middle Fork Anderson River watershed, Crawford and Perry counties, Indiana. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr7871

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Special Contributing Area Loading Program user’s manual

Information on the Special Contributing Area Loading Program execution and functions are presented in this user’s manual. An appendix presents a potential improvement for the user to consider. The hydrologic routing simulation method to model flow through multiple reservoirs, or sewer system components, is described. The use of Special Contributing Areas is described to run a successful simulation, which includes user input of hydrologic time series of flow components and the necessary formats. Upon completion of a successful Special Contributing Area Loading Program simulation, the program outputs hydrologic time series and a descriptive text file containing the model results for each defined sub-unit, or Special Contributing Area. The output time series contain flows through, and overflows from, the three reservoirs in the series, and the text file contains input and output path locations.

Open-File Report↗

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report↗

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region↗