Search USGSSearch

USGS · ofr6189

Structure and stratigraphy of the Pybus-Gambier area, Alaska

Abstract

The Pybus-Gambier area comprises about 215 square miles of uninhabited land on the southeastern coast of Admiralty Island, southeastern Alaska. The section consists of more than 20,000 feet of intensely folded sedimentary, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks, all probably of marine origin, ranging in age from Silurian(?) to Early Cretaceous, unconformably overlain by more than 10,000 feet of gently dipping nonmarine, coarse-grained sedimentary rocks, and basalt and andesite flows of Eocene age. Diorite plutons and associated contact metamorphic rocks occur in the little-know northwestern part of the area. The section here is subdivided into nine formations, eight of which are named for the first time, as follows: Gambier Bay formation of Middle(?) Devonian age, composed of greenschist, phyllite, marble, and metachert; Hood Bay formation or Silurian and Devonian age, composed of dark, carbonaceous, thin-bedded chert, argillite, limestone, and graywacke; Cannery formation of Permian age, composed of thin-bedded chert, argillite, and graywacke; Pybus dolomite of Permian age, composed of fossiliferous, cherty dolomite; Hyd formation of Late Triassic age, composed of a basal chert breccia, a limestone member, a thin-bedded argillite member, and a spilitic volcanic member; Seymour Canal formation of Late Cretaceous and Early Cretaceous age, composed of argillite, graywacke, and conglomerate; Brothers volcanic of Early Cretaceous age, composed of andesitic flows and breccia; unnamed conglomerate and sandstone of Eocene age, and Admiralty Island volcanics of Eocene age, composed of basaltic and andesitic flows. A marked angular unconformity occurs at the base of the Tertiary section, and unconformities of less angularity occur as follows: at the base of the Cannery formation; at the base of the Hyd formation, and at the base of the Seymour Canal formation. In general, pre-Seymour Canal deformation seems to have been mild, but the intensity of the post-Gambier Bay - pre-Cannery deformation is uncertain. The complex structure of the pre-Tertiary rocks seem to be the product chiefly of the post-Seymour Canal - pre-Eocene formation. The structure of the pre-Tertiary rocks is studied by graphical statistical analysis of the preferred orientation of the planar and linear structural elements. This analysis indicates that the post-Seymour Canal - pre-Eocene deformation consisted chiefly of three episodes of folding, all of which appear to have resulted from sub-horizontal, northeast-southwest compression. The first episode produced isoclinal folds in bedding, and in places associated axial plane foliation, that had north-northwesterly striking axial planes in eastern Pybus-Gambier area, but generally northeasterly striking axial planes west of False Point Pybus. Compression during the second episode deformed the first folds in the west where their axial planes were oriented about parallel to the compression into complex second folds in both bedding and axial plane foliation, having northwesterly striking axial planes. The second folds are absent in the east where the axial planes and limbs of the first folds were oriented about normal to the second compression. The divergence of the axial planes of the first folds in the west from those in the east may have been caused by the crowding of the first folds in the west against the irregular western margin of the geosyncline during the first compression. Northweststriking thrust and reverse faults occur between domains in which the axial planes of the first folds are strongly divergent. The third episode produced kink folds, having axial planes with subvertical dips but widely varying strikes, that are confined to the thinly fissile schists and phyllites of the Gambier Bay formation. The episodes of folding in the Gambier Bay formation are accompanied by metamorphic recrystallization not found in either younger or possibly coeval (Hood Bay formation) pre-Tertiary rocks. If these episodes are contemporaneous with those in nonmetamorphic pre-Tertiary rocks, then the metamorphism dies out both vertically and laterally, and may be part of the regional decrease in metamorphism westward away from the Coast Range batholith, located about 25 miles to the east. The gently dipping Tertiary strata have been broken into fault blocks by subvertical, north-and north-east striking, normal and reverse faults.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 56.87392354672548° to 57.800343437171534° latitude; -135.4161999804407° to -133.41015612007976° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert Ahlberg Loney. 1961. Structure and stratigraphy of the Pybus-Gambier area, Alaska. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr6189

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona