Predator effects on the survival of juvenile invasive carp in simulated backwater habitats

Courtney Lynn Broaddus; Cari-Ann Hayer; Curtis G. Byrd; Patrick Kroboth; Duane Chapman

doi:10.3391/mbi.2026.17.1.06

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70279232

Predator effects on the survival of juvenile invasive carp in simulated backwater habitats

Courtney Lynn Broaddus·Cari-Ann Hayer·Curtis G. Byrd·Patrick Kroboth·Duane Chapman

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Numerous control methods are in use and under development to manage invasive carps in the United States. Commercial harvest, electric deterrents, and chemical toxicants, among other methods, are most efficient at targeting larger individuals. Research on methods to control recruitment of juvenile invasive carps has been limited. Our primary objective was to assess the vulnerability of juvenile invasive carp and common native forage species, gizzard shad ( Dorosoma cepedianum ) to native fish predators. Eighteen two-week long experiments, from April–October in 2015 and 2016, were conducted in experimental ponds with differing habitats (structure, vegetation, or open), simulating backwater habitats that are commonly used by juvenile invasive carps. Bowfin ( Amia calva ), channel catfish ( Icatalurus punctatus ), shortnose gar ( Lepisosteus platostomus ), hybrid striped bass ( Morone saxatilis × Morone chrysops ), largemouth bass ( Micropterus salmoides ), blue catfish ( Ictalurus furcatus ), flathead catfish ( Pylodictis olivaris ), walleye ( Sander vitreus ), northern pike ( Esox lucius ), and smallmouth bass ( Micropterus dolomieu ) were tested as predators of bighead carp ( Hypophthalmichthys nobilis ), silver carp ( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix ), grass carp ( Ctenopharyngodon idella ), and gizzard shad. We observed prey survival rates across seasons, habitats, and predator species. Invasive carp odds of survival varied from those of native gizzard shad between years. Hybrid striped bass, largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, and northern pike were effective predators of all tested prey species. Largemouth bass and smallmouth bass consumed bighead carp and silver carp over gizzard shad and grass carp (log OR < 0.5). Our results demonstrate the importance of habitat and cover availability, and that predator management may be a potential control method for juvenile invasive carps. Future research may consider effective predator densities, as well as studies in natural habitats.

Explore related subjects

Management of Biological Invasions Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 24.046463999666567° to 71.35706654962706° latitude; -178.2421875° to -66.796875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Courtney Lynn Broaddus, Cari-Ann Hayer, Curtis G. Byrd, Patrick Kroboth, Duane Chapman. 2025. Predator effects on the survival of juvenile invasive carp in simulated backwater habitats. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2026.17.1.06

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Evaluating ichthyoplankton sampling as an effective method for early detection of novel aquatic invasive species in large bays of western Lake Erie

Early detection and monitoring are critically important for effective management of invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Specifically, Lake Erie is at high-risk for aquatic invasive species introductions due to many factors such as shoreline development, warm water temperatures, and transoceanic shipping traffic. Rare species captured are often used as a surrogate to assess sampling effectiveness for new or rare invasive species in vulnerable areas, such as Maumee and Sandusky bays of western Lake Erie. We compared species catches from multiple larval fish collection methods to those from adult and juvenile fish sampling. The specific objectives of this study were to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of larval fish sampling for aquatic invasive species early detection in two bays of western Lake Erie: Maumee Bay and Sandusky Bay; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of passive and active sampling techniques at capturing different larval fish taxa; and 3) compare effectiveness of larval sampling techniques to juvenile and adult fish sampling methods for detecting new and rare species. While no new non-native species were captured during the study, we found that larval fish sampling techniques were not effective for detecting new or rare species but could be used with other life-stage sampling. Active sampling with bongo nets was more effective than light trap sampling, capturing a higher number of individuals and taxa. Juvenile and adult fish sampling methods provided higher precision in fish identification without the use of genetic tools. Because of the finer taxonomic resolution possible when identifying juvenile and adult fishes, sampling for adult and juveniles was found to be more robust and reliable for early detection of new and rare species compared to larval fish sampling. However, larval fish sampling can still be appropriate depending on study goals and objectives or as emerging technologies allow for greater taxonomic resolution of sampled fish.

Michigan, Ohio↗

USGS2026

Global framework for communication of biological invasion risks

Biological invasions, driven by the spread of non-native species, have become a critical global issue because of their far-reaching ecological and socioeconomic impacts. Effective communication of the risks of biological invasions is essential for implementing robust policy and legislation and gaining public support for conservation efforts. However, current policies often suffer from fragmentation and ineffectiveness, largely due to inadequate risk communication and complex multilevel governance. To address this challenge, we develop a global framework designed to enhance clearer communication about biological invasion risks. The framework contextualizes key terms across three domains in invasion science: species invasiveness, risk analysis, and decision support tools. Using both diffusion-of-English and ecology-of-language paradigms, and following a three-step process involving preliminary consensus, AI querying, and ground-truthing with final consensus, we validate the framework in 70 non-English languages which, together with English, have official status in at least one country and collectively cover all 195 countries worldwide. Our findings reveal that while terminology for risk analysis is well established, terminology for species invasiveness and, especially, for decision support tools remains underdeveloped in many languages, hindering effective communication and policy implementation. Our framework underscores the importance of cultural and political neutrality. By promoting clearer risk communication among scientists, policymakers, and the public globally, we aim to reduce policy fragmentation and foster enhanced collaboration in risk mitigation. We recommend expanding multilingual decision support tools to include the full risk analysis process: risk identification, risk assessment, and risk management. This will support intergovernmental mitigation efforts and promote a unified global response to biological invasions.

Management of Biological Invasions↗

USGS2026

Evaluating treatment methods to control the egg masses of the crop pest Pomacea maculata

Pomacea maculata is an invasive aquatic apple snail species that poses serious ecological, agricultural, and public health threats across the southeastern United States. Its spread, particularly in Louisiana, has heavily impacted rice and crayfish farming, an industry producing over 90% of U.S. crayfish and valued at more than $250 million annually. The snail damages seedling rice, clogs crayfish traps, reduces yields, and increases labor for farmers. Moreover, it is a known host of rat lungworm ( Angiostrongylus cantonensis ), a parasite harmful to humans, making its presence in food production environments a public health concern. Controlling P. maculata is challenging due to its life cycle and reproductive strategies. The species lays large clutches of eggs above the waterline, where traditional aquatic molluscicides are ineffective. This study aimed to assess low-cost, practical methods for reducing egg hatch rates, specifically water submersion and vegetable oil application, on newly laid (day 1) and older (day 7) egg clutches. Laboratory trials on 125 egg clutches revealed that water submersion significantly reduced hatch rates and the development of dormant hatchlings, regardless of clutch age. Oil treatment only reduced hatch rates for day 1 clutches and had no effect on dormant hatchlings. These results suggest that water treatment is more broadly effective and feasible for farmers to apply without needing to determine egg age when applied on a routine, weekly basis. While oil showed limited use, its time-sensitive application limits practicality in the field. Water-based approaches offer a scalable solution for reducing P. maculata populations, but do not completely eliminate the potential for hatching and spreading. Without comprehensive control strategies targeting all life stages, the apple snail’s spread and associated impacts are expected to worsen, underscoring the urgency of continued management innovation.

Florida↗