Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70277250

Estimating the probability of export restrictions to inform mineral criticality

Abstract

To assess risks associated with advanced technologies’ supply chain disruptions, governmental agencies and others have developed mineral “criticality” assessments, with criticality described using the economic impact and probability of supply chain disruptions. Previous work developed subjective supply risk indicators to approximate this probability, typically combining several factors such as supply diversity and trading partners’ political stability, where indicator weightings can substantially impact results. This work explicitly quantifies export barrier probability using an ensemble of machine learning classifiers, with probability estimates informed by exogenous variables, including prior barrier implementation and global export dominance. Major differences in high-probability countries and commodities are observed across models, but the ensemble method highlights Indonesia, China, Tanzania, and the United States as particularly high risk. The Supplementary Data File provides export barrier probability estimates for each analyzed country-commodity pair, enabling a direct, quantitative, objective contribution to assessing mineral criticality, enhancing risk identification and prioritization for policymakers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

John W. Ryter, Nedal T. Nassar. 2025-11-17. Estimating the probability of export restrictions to inform mineral criticality. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108629

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Recycling radiogenic osmium by crustal foundering in subduction zones: Evidence from pyroxenite xenoliths in the north Andean arc

Removal of mafic-ultramafic lower crust (e.g., via delamination) is fundamental to making andesitic continental crust, yet direct evidence of this process remains elusive. A unique suite of garnet clinopyroxenite and hornblendite (arclogite) xenoliths from the northern volcanic zone of the Andes, erupted to the surface in the mid-Pleistocene, have bulk-rock geochemistry and osmium (Os) isotopic compositions that demonstrate their crustal affinity, yet have equilibration pressures and temperatures below the arc Mohorovičić discontinuity (~53 km) and some as deep as within the sub-arc mantle wedge (~105 km). Garnet websterites from the same xenolith suite, sourced from depths approaching the Wadati-Benioff zone (~140 km), have elemental and isotopic compositions indicative of a mantle origin, likely formed as products of peridotite-liquid reactions above the subducting slab. Variability in bulk-rock 143 Nd/ 144 Nd values and garnet oxygen isotope ratios ( 𝛿 18 O) for these samples is attributed to minor assimilation of subducted components and/or older crustal material, but assimilation alone cannot account for the highly radiogenic Os isotopic compositions. These results provide direct petrologic evidence for modern arclogite formation and foundering in the Andean orogen, the archetypal active continental subduction system. Elevated 187 Os/ 188 Os values of Mercaderes arclogites imply that recycling of gravitationally unstable arc cumulates during continental crust formation introduces highly radiogenic Os into the convective mantle, which has implications for mass fluxes across the crust-mantle boundary as well as the sources and evolution of mantle heterogeneity as seen in orogenic peridotite massifs and in the sources of oceanic basalts

Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Sand provenance boundary in the Mu Us Sandy Land of northern China

Desert dunes are often assumed to have uniform mineral compositions due to extensive mixing during lateral transport, which complicates provenance studies. The Mu Us Sandy Land in north-central China, near the East Asian summer monsoon precipitation boundary, experiences a wetter climate than most deserts. Climate wetting as a result of a warming climate, and the ‘Sand Control Project’ implemented by the Chinese government to decrease the lateral movement of sand dunes in this area provide an opportunity to study surface processes of sand production and transport. Previous studies using zircon U Pb geochronology and heavy mineral composition indicate distinct sand sources for the Mu Us Sandy Land: local basement-derived middle Yellow River sediments and recycled dried-up lacustrine sediments for the eastern part, and northeastern Tibetan Plateau-derived upper Yellow River sediments for the western part. However, zircons and heavy minerals only represent trace amounts of the bulk mineralogy within a sand dune, so broader provenance analysis targeting common minerals is essential. We focus on the area near the proposed provenance difference boundary between the western and eastern Mu Us Sandy Land, using comprehensive sampling and provenance techniques to confirm distinct provenance characteristics and delineate the provenance boundary. Our findings reveal that sand from most of the Mu Us Sandy Land originated from the erosion of local basement by the middle Yellow River and recycled local dried-up lacustrine sediments, whereas the southwestern corner and the neighboring western-central Chinese Loess Plateau received sediments from the distal northeastern Tibetan Plateau.

Mu Us Sandy Land

Scientific opportunities in the National Landscape Conservation System

The National Landscape Conservation System consists of unique and beautiful places across America’s landscapes where identified resources and values are protected and science is highlighted. The mission of the National Landscape Conservation System (NLCS), which is managed by the Bureau of Land Management and is often referred to as the agency’s National Conservation Lands, is to conserve, protect, and restore nationally significant landscapes for their cultural, ecological, and scientific values. This clear inclusion of science in the NLCS mission sets the stage for individual units to serve as places of learning, teaching, discovery, and innovation. Science is an integral part of managing the National Conservation Lands, and science conducted within and across the more than 900 units that make up the NLCS can inform and influence conservation and public land management well beyond its boundaries. Here, we highlight seven core aspects of National Conservation Lands that present valuable science opportunities: (1) the scientific values for which individual units are designated; (2) the many other resources, objects, and values within units; (3) the value of units as “control” sites for understanding the effects of activities such as mineral extraction that commonly occur elsewhere on multiple-use public lands but are often prohibited within National Conservation Lands; (4) the value of units for studying the effects of activities such as recreation that regularly occur and may be intensified on National Conservation Lands; (5) the high visibility of units, which draws strong interest and engagement from scientists, partners, and the public; (6) the functioning of the units as a network managed for a common purpose, which provides an opportunity to explore cross-cutting science questions across widely varying contexts and geographies; and (7) the opportunities units provide to promote and apply Indigenous Knowledge to scientific research to manage natural and cultural resources. Because of all of these characteristics, National Conservation Lands can serve as hubs for basic and applied science that can inform management of all public lands and resources into the future. We highlight these science opportunities through examples from existing units and suggest two actions that could help further science activities and impact on National Conservation Lands.

Parks Stewardship Forum