Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70274749

Statistical analysis

Abstract

Effective monitoring of populations is critical for assessing the efficacy of conservation and management activities, determining the conservation status of a species, and examining trends over time. However, far too often, monitoring efforts fall short of adequately describing the population. Poorly defined problems and objectives, a lack of standard operating procedures, a poor selection of attributes to monitor (We define attributes as characteristics such as presence-absence, relative abundance, size structure, body condition, and age structure data), inadequate survey designs (e.g., low survey effort or statistical power), a lack of consistency due to budget shortages or staffing turnover, and a lack of rigorous analyses of the data focused on improving monitoring methods are the causes of ineffective monitoring (Lindenmayer and Likens 2010; Reynolds 2012). Many of these issues can be addressed prior to implementing a monitoring program by defining clear objectives, developing a formal protocol with specific instructions on how to conduct the survey, analyzing historical data to estimate the required sample size, exploring collaborations between biologists and statisticians, and instituting a formal goal to regularly analyze the data collected to improve the monitoring process (Lindenmayer and Likens 2010). The goal of this chapter is to provide an overview of defining the sampling frame, site selection from the sampling frame, sample size estimation, data summarization and analysis techniques, parameter estimation, and hypothesis testing, as well as recognizing when a monitoring program is unlikely to produce the desired results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David R Stewart, Kristin M Broms, Ken G Gerow, Micheal A Allen, Michael C. Quist. 2024. Statistical analysis. https://doi.org/10.47886/9781934874769.ch14

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Loma salmonae and related species

Loma salmonae is a microsporidium that infects Pacific salmon and causes a gill inflammatory syndrome known as microsporidial gill disease of salmon. This disease has been mostly associated with netpen-farmed Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) in British Columbia, Canada. Clinical, diagnostic, pathological aspects of disease, as well as approaches for disease avoidance in salmon aquaculture are discussed. A laboratory infection model in rainbow trout was used to determine life cycle-stages, transmission dynamics, pathophysiology, influence of temperature, and to test therapeutics applicable to aquaculture. This experimental model has been informative on various approaches of disease control, including the development of a promising vaccine. In addition to improving fish health in salmon farming in North America, this L. salmonae model will be applicable to other microsporidial diseases that may be encountered in emerging aquaculture regions.

Book chapter

Cumulative effects of multiple stressors on marine mammals: Elephant seals as a model system

Noise exposure is a potential stressor for free-ranging marine mammals and is often studied in the absence of other environmental factors. Here, a multi-investigator, interdisciplinary effort was undertaken to examine the response of elephant seals to multiple stressors. An integrated physiological and ecological approach was taken, including immunology, stress physiology, toxicology, animal behavior, population biology, and life history theory, to examine the cumulative effects of exposure to multiple stressors in elephant seals. While we measured the response of individual animals, a population response can be predicted by incorporating these results into the long-term data on elephant seal demographics.

Book chapter

When is a parasite a problem?

A parasite’s perceived societal impact depends on the disease it causes and the perception of the affected host species. For instance, doctors and veterinarians have a mission to treat parasites that infect humans or that impact host species that have some utilitarian or aesthetic value for society. Marine scientists have different concerns than doctors. Although the number of parasites that marine scientists should be concerned about may vary, only 13% of parasites and 6% of host–parasite links might be considered “problematic” in a kelp forest food web. With regard to the many threats to marine ecosystems, these percentages suggest that most parasites and infectious diseases are inconsequential. A related issue is the common expectation that parasites and the impacts that they cause are increasing under stress as ocean environments across the globe degrade. Yet, reports of disease have not increased due to human impacts on the marine environment, where the factors that influence parasitism are more complex. Thus, the expectation that marine parasites create problems, and that the diseases they cause are getting worse, is more likely the exception than the rule.

Book chapter