Density dependence and habitat selection affect overwintering abundance of monarch butterflies at regional and site scales in California

Peter Christian Ibsen; Zachary H. Ancona; Emma Pelton; Stephanie Little; James E. Diffendorfer

doi:10.1111/csp2.70253

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70274538

Density dependence and habitat selection affect overwintering abundance of monarch butterflies at regional and site scales in California

Peter Christian Ibsen·Zachary H. Ancona·Emma Pelton·Stephanie Little·James E. Diffendorfer

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) is a species of iconic cultural interest. Thanks to annual overwintering monarch counts at hundreds of locations in coastal California, we are able to track fluctuations with high temporal and spatial resolution. Between 1997 and 2024, monarch populations at overwintering sites in the western United States experienced severe dips, at times (2018–2020, 2023–2024) giving the appearance of a population collapse. From 2018 to present, the Pismo State Beach Overwintering Monarch Grove has conducted multiple counts during overwintering and geolocated counts of individual monarch clusters to specific trees within the site. This study determined how annual monarch population variability is influenced by both climate and prior year population density at the state, region, and overwintering-site scale. Furthermore, through a machine-learning process, we investigated how overwintering site configuration and structure drive monarch winter space-use dynamics within the Pismo Beach site. Our approach found monarchs exhibit a preference for specific overwintering sites in California, and that 64% of annual variability of counts across sites can be explained by climate and density dependence, with density dependence explaining 50% of total variability. Within the site we found very little regional climate effect, but individual trees, tree size, distance to boundary, and the amount of shade were all strong indicators of monarch presence. Additionally, only 11 out of 320 trees at the Pismo Beach site accounted for 83.6% of all counts over 6 years, highlighting how monarchs use specific trees and how tree structure may create preferred microclimates for clustering.

Explore related subjects

Conservation Science and Practice Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 34° to 38° latitude; -123° to -119.5° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Peter Christian Ibsen, Zachary H. Ancona, Emma Pelton, Stephanie Little, James E. Diffendorfer. 2026-03-10. Density dependence and habitat selection affect overwintering abundance of monarch butterflies at regional and site scales in California. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Successes and opportunities for solutions-oriented conservation research: Lessons learned from avian science

Conservation science struggles with an ongoing divide between research and action. Given its history of broad public engagement and multi-scale management coordination, avian conservation typifies many of the challenges, successes, and opportunities across the broader field of conservation and is rich with examples that may guide solutions-oriented conservation science. In semi-structured focus groups composed of bird conservation scientists and practitioners from various backgrounds, we discussed the definition, characteristics, and examples of solutions-oriented conservation science. Our discussions highlighted several examples where successful application of avian conservation science led to change in programs, policy, regulations, and social systems, including several with co-benefits for local communities. These successes were characterized by communication, collaboration, and co-development with local communities, decision-makers, practitioners, and Indigenous communities. We identified remaining opportunities for improvement, including aligning incentives and priorities between research and practice, working across disciplines to mobilize solutions, dismantling barriers to inclusion, and emphasizing the importance of relationship-building in conservation science. We outline suggestions that researchers can use to incorporate these lessons from solutions-oriented avian conservation science into training and mentoring programs.

Conservation Science and Practice↗

USGS2026

Connecting and coordinating conservation action across landscapes through regional planning processes and syntheses

Modern threats to conservation are often global; however, relevant conservation decisions and actions typically occur within local jurisdictions. The socio-ecological complexity of these problems requires collaboration across large landscapes, diverse community interests, and geopolitical boundaries, yet a lack of interoperability of planning products among decision makers, jurisdictions, and objectives impedes collaboration. Here, we provide a working model for the collaborative, iterative development of a landscape conservation design (LCD) in the Midwest region of the United States, the Midwest Conservation Blueprint, and demonstrate its applicability to the coordination of voluntary conservation actions and investments across jurisdictional boundaries. We used spatial prioritization software to synthesize over 20 datasets to develop a basemap of priority lands and waters for conservation across a diverse set of societal and ecological values (e.g., water quality, biodiversity, recreation). The Midwest Conservation Blueprint is a living plan, updated annually based on improvements in underlying data, understanding of local conditions, and public input. Landscape-scale planning is not designed to replace local knowledge or supersede decision-making authorities. However, by synthesizing existing data that represent diverse socio-ecological values and planning at a broader scale, the Midwest Conservation Blueprint documents where there are shared priorities and opportunities for collaborative landscape conservation.

Midwest↗

USGS2026

Debunking the myth of the quintessential resource manager: Precision in actionable science

“Actionable science” is a widely held standard for identifying the merits of natural resources research. Yet, science is often framed as actionable to a vaguely identified quintessential “manager” without defining either the intended manager or use. Generic descriptions lack precision for identifying end users or their needs, limiting methodological rigor in research design and leading to contextual misalignments of outputs with the need they intended to serve. Further, imprecise terminology limits the ability to evaluate impact, replicate efforts, or foster adoption and implementation of findings. This perspective article presents the heuristic of “who, what, when, where, why, how” to help researchers be more precise when describing their actionable science. Through intentional reflection, researchers can move beyond generic framings of “managers” representing monolithic organizations. “Managers” become individuals, with unique responsibilities, functions, worldviews, and levels of authority, all influencing their use of and need for scientific information and data.

Conservation Science and Practice↗