Mammalian scent lures fail to increase detections of invasive Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus)

Storm Miller; Michael Kirkland; Kristen M. Hart; Robert A. McCleery

doi:10.3391/mbi.2025.16.4.14

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70273182

Mammalian scent lures fail to increase detections of invasive Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus)

Storm Miller·Michael Kirkland·Kristen M. Hart·Robert A. McCleery

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Burmese pythons ( Python bivittatus ) are large constricting snakes native to Southeast Asia that have invaded the Greater Everglades Ecosystem in South Florida, USA. Pythons have caused precipitous declines in native mammals and are exceedingly difficult to detect using traditional methods such as scout snakes, detection dogs, and visual surveys. Live mammal lures have previously been used to attract pythons, with rabbits outperforming rodents in increasing detection. While live mammal lures can increase python detection and identify hotspots of python activity, ensuring animal welfare and logistical challenges limit their utility. As part of this study, field experiments were conducted to determine if mammalian lures, derived from rabbits (feces, urine, and hair) could replace live mammals and increase the detection of pythons. We ran trials for 84 days from June to September 2022 for 21 paired plots across three study sites in the Greater Everglades. We monitored two groups, the treatment (i.e., rabbit scent) and control (i.e., soil) with camera traps on a 1-minute time lapse. We detected 11 pythons during our study, but there was no difference between controls with soil ( n = 7) and treatments (n = 4). However, we did find that scent lures increased native snake detection. This pattern was best explained by an increased number of rodents at the scent lures. Our experiment indicates that mammalian scent lures alone are insufficient to attract pythons. Since live mammals can attract pythons, but scent lures cannot, future studies could examine if a multi-faceted lure combining several stimuli (i.e., heat, visual, movement) might increase python detection.

Explore related subjects

Management of Biological Invasions Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 24.82424493681546° to 27.27096474639113° latitude; -82.30512053794736° to -79.92278840629575° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Storm Miller, Michael Kirkland, Kristen M. Hart, Robert A. McCleery. 2025-08-11. Mammalian scent lures fail to increase detections of invasive Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus). https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2025.16.4.14

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Bait baskets reduce trap disturbance and rebaiting for invasive Argentine black and white tegus (Salvator merianae) in the Greater Everglades Ecosystem, USA

Effective invasive species management can be informed by strategies that maximize removal while minimizing costs. In the southeastern United States, metal-mesh bait baskets are routinely used to protect chicken egg lures in traps targeting invasive Argentine black and white tegu lizards ( Salvator merianae ). These bait baskets are designed to reduce bait loss and nontarget species captures, potentially lowering rebaiting frequency and associated labor. Using data from a multi-year trapping effort and from a crossover experiment on the periphery of Everglades National Park, Florida, we evaluated the influence of bait baskets on tegu and nontarget capture rates, trap disturbance, and rebaiting needs. We found no evidence that bait baskets affected tegu or nontarget capture in either the multi-year or crossover experiment datasets, but they did reduce trap disturbance and rebaiting frequency in the multiyear dataset following their implementation in 2016. In the crossover experiment, rebaiting frequency declined only in the first trial. Overall, bait baskets may enhance trap efficiency by extending functional trap time and reducing maintenance costs.

Florida↗

USGS2026

Evaluating ichthyoplankton sampling as an effective method for early detection of novel aquatic invasive species in large bays of western Lake Erie

Early detection and monitoring are critically important for effective management of invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Specifically, Lake Erie is at high-risk for aquatic invasive species introductions due to many factors such as shoreline development, warm water temperatures, and transoceanic shipping traffic. Rare species captured are often used as a surrogate to assess sampling effectiveness for new or rare invasive species in vulnerable areas, such as Maumee and Sandusky bays of western Lake Erie. We compared species catches from multiple larval fish collection methods to those from adult and juvenile fish sampling. The specific objectives of this study were to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of larval fish sampling for aquatic invasive species early detection in two bays of western Lake Erie: Maumee Bay and Sandusky Bay; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of passive and active sampling techniques at capturing different larval fish taxa; and 3) compare effectiveness of larval sampling techniques to juvenile and adult fish sampling methods for detecting new and rare species. While no new non-native species were captured during the study, we found that larval fish sampling techniques were not effective for detecting new or rare species but could be used with other life-stage sampling. Active sampling with bongo nets was more effective than light trap sampling, capturing a higher number of individuals and taxa. Juvenile and adult fish sampling methods provided higher precision in fish identification without the use of genetic tools. Because of the finer taxonomic resolution possible when identifying juvenile and adult fishes, sampling for adult and juveniles was found to be more robust and reliable for early detection of new and rare species compared to larval fish sampling. However, larval fish sampling can still be appropriate depending on study goals and objectives or as emerging technologies allow for greater taxonomic resolution of sampled fish.

Michigan, Ohio↗

USGS2026

Global framework for communication of biological invasion risks

Biological invasions, driven by the spread of non-native species, have become a critical global issue because of their far-reaching ecological and socioeconomic impacts. Effective communication of the risks of biological invasions is essential for implementing robust policy and legislation and gaining public support for conservation efforts. However, current policies often suffer from fragmentation and ineffectiveness, largely due to inadequate risk communication and complex multilevel governance. To address this challenge, we develop a global framework designed to enhance clearer communication about biological invasion risks. The framework contextualizes key terms across three domains in invasion science: species invasiveness, risk analysis, and decision support tools. Using both diffusion-of-English and ecology-of-language paradigms, and following a three-step process involving preliminary consensus, AI querying, and ground-truthing with final consensus, we validate the framework in 70 non-English languages which, together with English, have official status in at least one country and collectively cover all 195 countries worldwide. Our findings reveal that while terminology for risk analysis is well established, terminology for species invasiveness and, especially, for decision support tools remains underdeveloped in many languages, hindering effective communication and policy implementation. Our framework underscores the importance of cultural and political neutrality. By promoting clearer risk communication among scientists, policymakers, and the public globally, we aim to reduce policy fragmentation and foster enhanced collaboration in risk mitigation. We recommend expanding multilingual decision support tools to include the full risk analysis process: risk identification, risk assessment, and risk management. This will support intergovernmental mitigation efforts and promote a unified global response to biological invasions.

Management of Biological Invasions↗