Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70271720

Machine learning generated streamflow drought forecasts for the Conterminous United States (CONUS): Developing and evaluating an operational tool to enhance sub-seasonal to seasonal streamflow drought early warning for gaged locations

Abstract

Forecasts of streamflow drought, when streamflow declines below typical levels, are notably less available than for floods or meteorological drought, despite widespread impacts. To address this gap, we apply machine learning (ML) models to forecast streamflow drought 1-13 weeks into the future at > 3,000 streamgage locations across the conterminous United States (CONUS). We applied two ML methods (Long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks; Light Gradient-Boosting Machine - LightGBM) and two benchmark model approaches (persistence; Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average - ARIMA) to predict weekly streamflow percentiles with independent models for each forecast horizon. To explore whether a training focus on dry weeks improved performance, both ML models were trained using all percentiles (LSTM-all, LightGBM-all) and only percentiles below 30% (LSTM<30, LightGBM<30). We evaluated model performance regionally and nationally for drought occurrence (the classification performance for a future date) and for drought onset/termination (performance identifying drought starts and ends). ML models generally performed worse than the persistence model for discrete classification (moderate, severe, extreme drought) of drought occurrence but exceeded the benchmark models for onset/termination. ML models outperformed benchmarks in predicting continuous streamflow percentiles below 30%. Occurrence performance was better for less intense droughts and shorter forecast horizons, with the ML models having predictive power at 1-4 week horizons for severe droughts (10th percentile threshold). All models struggled to forecast onset, though the best ML model was the LSTM<30 (sensitivity of 22%). Termination performance was greater, with the drought termination performance greatest for the LightGBM-all model. When estimating model uncertainty, the LSTM<30 model had the narrowest 90% percentile interval with closest to optimal capture. This work highlights the challenges and opportunities to further advance hydrological drought forecasting and supports an experimental operational streamflow drought assessment and forecast tool.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 25.08° to 49.38905° latitude; -124.68721° to -66.96466° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John C. Hammond, Phillip J. Goodling, Jeremy Alejandro Diaz, Hayley R. Corson-Dosch, Aaron Joseph Heldmyer, Scott Douglas Hamshaw, Ryan R. McShane, Jesse Cleveland Ross, Roy Sando, Caelan Simeone, Erik Smith, Leah Ellen Staub, David Watkins, Michael Wieczorek, Kendall C. Wnuk, Jacob Aaron Zwart. 2025. Machine learning generated streamflow drought forecasts for the Conterminous United States (CONUS): Developing and evaluating an operational tool to enhance sub-seasonal to seasonal streamflow drought early warning for gaged locations. https://doi.org/10.31223/x56x77

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Evaluating bank restoration and stabilization in the Yellow River in northern Indiana: Mitigation of sediment and nutrient transport

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Kankakee River Basin and Yellow River Basin Development Commission, evaluated the effects of streambank remediation on the Yellow River in northwest Indiana. Two phases of remediation were completed on the Yellow River between 2021 and 2023, after assessments indicated it was a large contributor of sediment to the Kankakee River. Temporal effects were assessed using pre‑remediation (April 2019 –October 2021) and post‑remediation (February – October 2024) data from two long‑term monitoring sites, USGS 05516665 Yellow River near Oak Grove (Oak Grove) and USGS 05517000 Yellow River at Knox (Knox). Spatial patterns were evaluated among sites from upstream to downstream during the post-remediation period. Monitoring included the pre-existing Oak Grove and Knox sites, an additional monitoring site at USGS streamgage 05516500 Yellow River at Plymouth (Plymouth), and discrete sampling at two additional sites. Discrete sites include USGS 05516663 Yellow River at Upas Rd near Oak Grove (Upas Rd), located upstream of the remediation reach, and USGS 05516667 Yellow River at CR11100E near Oak Grove (CR1100E), located within the remediation reach. Generalized least squares and linear mixed‑effects regression models were used to evaluate temporal differences in turbidity-to-discharge relations for slope and turbidity units, discharge, and suspended‑sediment in before and after remediation data. Similar analysis using generalized least squares and linear mixed‑effects regression models were conducted for spatial analysis of discharge and sediment and nutrient concentrations and fluxes at each site post-remediation. Temporal comparisons showed that turbidity increased less with discharge increases after remediation, indicated by slope of relation, at both Oak Grove and Knox, indicating improved water clarity during higher flows. Mean turbidity and suspended‑sediment concentrations were not statistically different between remediation periods. Comparison of the post-remediation continuous water quality data from upstream to downstream sites through the remediated reaches indicated that downstream sites exhibited steeper turbidity‑to‑discharge slopes than the upstream control site at Plymouth. A statistically significant difference was detected between the slopes at Oak Grove and Plymouth, whereas Knox did not differ significantly from either Plymouth or Oak Grove. Downstream sites had significantly lower mean turbidity, suggesting improved water clarity within and downstream of the remediation reach. Nutrient concentrations generally decreased moving downstream and suspended‑sediment concentrations showed no consistent trend. Nutrient and sediment fluxes increased downstream, likely reflecting the influence of greater discharge volumes. Interpretation of remediation effects was limited by the absence of pre‑remediation data at upstream sites and by the short post‑remediation monitoring period. Continued monitoring could allow for assessment of longer‑term responses to streambank remediation on the Yellow River, as effects may become more pronounced over time.

EarthArXiv↗

Hydrogeology and water quality of the unconsolidated aquifer system in the Lower Fall Creek Valley, Tompkins County, New York

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Tompkins County and the Town of Dryden, conducted a hydrogeologic investigation of the lower Fall Creek unconsolidated aquifer system in Tompkins County, New York. This study is part of an ongoing effort to characterize major valley-fill aquifers in the region to support sustainable groundwater management. The lower Fall Creek valley, encompassing the Village of Freeville, the unincorporated communities of Etna, and the hamlets of McLean and Varna, has experienced moderate development and relies heavily on groundwater for residential, agricultural, and commercial use. The study area spans approximately 51 square miles along the boundary of the Allegheny Plateau and North Rim of the Allegheny Plateau physiographic provinces. The aquifer system, composed primarily of glacially derived sand and gravel deposits, includes both unconfined and confined aquifer units. For the approximately 2,300 people who live over the aquifers, groundwater is the sole source of drinking water. In some areas, such as the Village of Freeville, artesian conditions exist, with potentiometric heads exceeding 25 feet above land surface. This report describes the hydrogeologic framework, aquifer distribution, groundwater-flow dynamics, and water quality of the lower Fall Creek aquifer system. Groundwater is generally hard and contains elevated concentrations of redox-sensitive constituents, such as iron and manganese relative to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency secondary maximum contaminant levels. Arsenic was not detected above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level during this study but remains a regional concern due to past detections in the study area and nearby aquifers. The findings provide data for local planners and resource managers to use in understanding and protecting this water resource.

EarthArXiv↗

Investigation of drivers and sources of potential harmful algal blooms in Lake Anna, Virginia, 2023-24

Algal blooms in freshwater reservoirs are an increasing concern because of the risk to aquatic ecosystem health, recreational use, and water quality. Among the taxa that comprise an algal bloom, cyanobacteria are of particular concern due to the potential to produce toxic compounds which can cause acute and chronic illness in humans if ingested through contaminated water or shellfish. When toxins are above a toxin-specific threshold in the water column, the Commonwealth of Virginia categorizes the bloom as a harmful algal bloom (HAB), distinguishing it from an algal bloom without toxins present. Toxins are of particular concern in bodies of water which serve as major recreational areas, such as Lake Anna in central Virginia. Lake Anna is a 27 km-long and 47 km2 reservoir in central Virginia. Since the Commonwealth of Virginia revised the HAB monitoring framework in 2018, algal bloom advisories for potentially toxigenic blooms have been issued in the western, riverine zone of the reservoir. There were detections of microcystin and anatoxin production but no detections of cylindrospermopsin and saxitoxin production in Lake Anna; however, toxin concentrations were low, at values less than 0.65 µg/L. In 2023, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, initiated a 19-month intensive and extensive study of western Lake Anna and its tributaries (North Anna River and Pamunkey Creek) to (1) characterize the algal community, biomass, and toxin production; (2) identify potential drivers leading to algal bloom initiation, persistence, and decline; and (3) assess the primary sources of the drivers contributing to algal blooms. Continuous and discrete monitoring of water quality within the lake, watershed inputs, meteorological conditions, and algal communities were monitored. Multiple modeling scenarios identified that the formation and persistence of algal blooms in Lake Anna are driven by interactions among chemical, macro- and micronutrient, and physical factors. Key drivers include total nitrogen, total phosphorus, water temperature, suspended sediment concentration, wind speed, copper, iron, molybdenum, nickel, sodium, and alkalinity. During this study, winter stormflow events delivered the highest loading of macro- and micronutrients from the tributaries to the lake. The lake is a sink for these nutrients in the water column or in the lake-bed sediments. During high-occupancy and recreation periods on the lake in the summer months, boating activity can promote internal loading by the resuspension of the lake-bed sediments, thereby increasing the nutrient availability for algal uptake. Thermal stratification and hypoxic conditions were observed, which can contribute to the passive release of nutrients into the water column, further facilitating algal bloom proliferation. These processes may create a positive feedback loop that supports the formation, persistence, and annual recurrence of algal blooms in the western region of Lake Anna. Continued water-quality monitoring of early warning indicators may improve the detection and forecasting of algal growth in the lake and help managers proactively manage water quality and algal growth.

EarthArXiv↗