Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70269069

If you build it, will they come? Assessing the response of tiger populations to elevated conservation efforts in lowland Nepal

Abstract

Thirteen countries within the distributional range of tigers adopted the St. Petersburg Declaration in 2010, committing to double their tiger populations by 2022. As a signatory to this document, Nepal elevated its tiger conservation efforts soon after the declaration was adopted. Using capture-mark-recapture (CMR) analyses of tiger survey data (2013–2022), we assessed the response of tiger populations to enhanced conservation measures in Banke and Bardia national parks (NP) in western lowland of Nepal. In Bardia NP, estimated tiger numbers increased from 49 in 2013 to 122 in 2022, and estimated population density increased from 3.39 in 2013 to 8.47 tigers/100 km 2 in 2022). Female survival rate was consistently higher than male, with 87.06 % during 2013–2018 and 89.08 % during 2018–2022, compared to 72.9 % and 76.6 % for males in the respective periods. Additionally, the female population grew at a faster rate (6–7 % per year vs. ∼ 2 % per year for males). In Banke NP, tiger abundance increased from 3 to 22 between 2013 and 2022, and population density increased from 0.34 to 2.42/100 km 2 over the same period. The remarkable 7-fold increase in tiger abundance within the Banke NP was facilitated by high male and female survival rates (≥ 90 % per year), as well as high recruitment rates (0.27 individual −1 year −1 ) from 2013 to 2018, leading to a robust (18–20 %) annual population growth rate. Tigers were recolonizing Banke NP at the beginning of this study, and the area offered ample space and a recovering prey base. This facilitated the recruitment of dispersers from the larger population in Bardia NP and allowed survival to be high by eliminating mortality due to density-dependent intra-specific aggression. Our results not only suggest that Nepal has met or exceeded its commitment to the St. Petersburg Declaration in Banke and Bardia NPs, but they highlight the ability of certain tiger populations to respond quickly and positively to enhanced conservation measures given suitable habitat and a healthy prey base.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 27.8331018653778° to 28.814284168801763° latitude; 80.92541905887717° to 82.23232219898381° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Saneer Lamichhane, Abhinaya Pathak, Ajay Karki, Ambika P. Khatiwada, Chiranjibi Prasad Pokheral, James E. Hines, Dave P. Onorato, Taylor V. Stein, Madan K. Oli. 2025-05-16. If you build it, will they come? Assessing the response of tiger populations to elevated conservation efforts in lowland Nepal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03632

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Key considerations for decision makers and stakeholders when identifying source populations for conservation translocations of fishes

Conservation translocations are undertaken to increase the viability of imperiled organisms and/or restore ecosystem functions or processes. A key step in the conservation translocation process is to decide which source or founder population is most likely to lead to translocation success. Existing guidance to inform this decision includes a variety of considerations, but few documents focus solely on this step. Furthermore, despite the importance of stakeholder engagement to long-term conservation success, guidance for selecting source populations rarely describes approaches for stakeholder inclusion. Herein, we undertook a literature review for fish conservation translocations and summarized key considerations (e.g., genetics, habitat, life history, effects on source or recipient populations and ecosystems, logistical) to be used when selecting candidate source populations. We describe the importance of including stakeholders and recommend that decision makers coproduce the source population decision with them. We propose a structured expert judgment approach to assess the probability that specific aspects of these considerations could be achieved for each candidate source population. Finally, we recommend synthesizing results of the expert judgement process to enable decision makers and, ideally, invited stakeholders to choose which source population(s) based on their previously identified fundamental objectives. Although we developed this approach for fishes, it could be used for other conservation translocation efforts where stakeholder involvement and synthesis of support for different source populations are deemed valuable in the planning process.

Global Ecology and Conservation↗

Hakalau’s moving castle: How climate change and restoration are shifting an island fortress for forest birds

Hakalau Forest Unit of the Big Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex (hereafter, Hakalau) protects the largest area with the highest endemic forest bird diversity in Hawaiʻi, including four federally listed species. Hakalau’s higher elevation montane forest provides refuge from avian malaria ( Plasmodium relictum ), a primary driver of Hawaiian honeycreeper extinctions. However, recent declines in Hakalau’s birds at lower elevations could indicate that conditions have become suitable for disease vector Culex quinquefasciatus . We evaluated the statuses of Hakalau’s bird populations in the context of recent climatic changes using new survey data from point-transect distance sampling, producing abundance estimates from 1999 to 2024. We stratified our analysis across four elevation ranges (<1500 m, 1500–1700 m, 1700–1900 m, and >1900 m) and assessed trends for each species using state-space models (SSMs). We constrained population trajectories to be biologically realistic by incorporating population dynamic models within the SSMs. We observed highly species-specific abundance trends below 1500 m, predominantly stable to upward trends within 1500–1700 m, stable trends within 1700–1900 m, and upward trends above 1900 m. Declines in Hawaiʻi ʻamakihi ( Chlorodrepanis v. virens ) and endangered ʻakiapōlāʻau ( Hemignathus wilsoni ) abundance coincided with lengthening warm seasonal temperatures indicative of shrinking disease-free habitat below 1700 m. Above 1900 m, however, increases in nearly all species indicate that reforestation has likely restored disease-free habitat since 1999. While most species were stable to increasing overall, surveillance for mosquitoes and disease at lower elevations, documenting changes in habitat, and continuing bird population monitoring can help to gauge their long-term persistence at Hakalau.

Hawaii↗

Status assessment of peregrine falcons in North America using integrated population models

Species status assessments require an understanding of underlying population dynamics and important drivers of species demography. Large-scale assessments can be difficult due to challenges collating data obtained through different methods and different sources at multiple scales. Integrated population models (IPMs) provide a unified framework to combine multiple data sources and jointly estimate population parameters over a large spatiotemporal scale. We developed separate IPMs to estimate abundance and demographic rates for a northern (NMP) and southern (SMP) management population of peregrine falcons ( Falco peregrinus ) in North America from 2008 through 2019 (SMP) and 2020 (NMP). An outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) starting in 2021 led us to extend our modeling effort to assess its impact on these management populations by updating both IPMs using index data of population size through 2024 in a predictive framework. Survival probabilities differed drastically between first-year and after-first-year individuals in both management populations. After-first-year survival was nearly identical between the NMP and SMP, but first-year survival was lower in the SMP. Mean productivity was significantly lower in the NMP compared to the SMP, whereas the probability of breeding was similar in both management populations. Estimated total abundance for the NMP was substantially larger than the SMP, representing most of the North American peregrine population. Population growth was positive for both management populations, albeit at a slower rate for the NMP. The NMP declined from 2017 to 2018 coinciding with a drop in 2018 estimated productivity. When we extended the IPMs with updated count data through 2024, the NMP slightly declined but estimated abundance remained above levels at the start of the time series analyzed. The SMP grew at a similar rate to that predicted during the period informed by demographic data. We did not detect a continental-scale change in population size or trajectory in either management population associated with the arrival of HPAI in 2021. Further monitoring can support determination of whether the declines in the NMP were temporary, can enhance understanding of the underlying mechanisms, and can be used to guide the conservation and management of the peregrine falcon population in North America.

North America↗