Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70262305

Stream macroinvertebrate reintroductions: A cautionary approach for restored urban streams

Abstract

Macroinvertebrate assemblages often remain depauperate in physically restored urban streams despite efforts to improve habitat conditions and increase species abundance and diversity. The lack of biological recovery may be due to a lack of a natural, nearby source of colonists, and this has inspired researchers and practitioners to reintroduce macroinvertebrates in otherwise restored urban streams to jump start the recovery process. However, without standardized guidelines that describe reintroduction best practices, some reintroduction programs may create additional problems (e.g., disease spread, genetic homogenization, population loss). To reduce these risks and limit a potential waste of resources, a cautionary approach is warranted. In this paper we summarize current stream reintroduction knowledge and detail best practices for aquatic macroinvertebrate reintroduction in restored urban streams. We provide criteria that managers can use to determine whether reintroduction is appropriate and demonstrate how researchers can use reintroduction as a tool to test hypotheses regarding factors limiting recolonization. We provide guidance for how to set clear reintroduction goals, select donor sites, determine the number of organisms required, establish reintroduction frequency and timing, and overcome challenges associated with monitoring. This framework can help managers create more successful reintroduction programs that can benefit urban stream restoration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sandra M. Clinton, Jacqueline Hartman, Kate H. Macneale, Allison H. Roy. 2022. Stream macroinvertebrate reintroductions: A cautionary approach for restored urban streams. https://doi.org/10.1086/721471

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Foodweb transfer and associated human exposure to methylmercury in Flathead Lake, Montana, USA

Reintroducing traditional foods into Indigenous contemporary diets can improve human health outcomes but may increase exposure to toxins, such as methylmercury (MeHg) in fish. This study examined the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) Lake Trout ( Salvelinus namaycush [Walbaum, 1792]) suppression program in Flathead Lake, Montana, USA, a management strategy to restore the native fishery that may affect the food web and MeHg biomagnification rates. CSKT sells harvested Lake Trout ≤610 mm in length in local markets, donating a portion to local food pantries. We asked 1) To what extent do length and trophic level control MeHg concentrations in Lake Trout, Lake Whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis [Mitchill, 1818]), and Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus [Suckley, 1859]) in Flathead Lake? and 2) What are the health outcomes for Tribal women of childbearing age consuming fish fillets donated to local food pantries by CSKT? We calculated the MeHg biomagnification slope; modeled relationships between fish length, trophic position, and MeHg concentration; used probabilistic modeling to assess safe fish-consumption levels; evaluated fish-consumption habits of Tribal women; and estimated a benefit–risk quotient (BRQ) for Lake Trout. The MeHg biomagnification slope was 0.18 (CI: 0.17, 0.19), similar to oligotrophic, temperate lakes where Lake Trout are the top predator. Fish length and C and N isotope ratios explained 88% of the variation in log e (MeHg) concentration in Lake Trout. Fish-consumption rates among Tribal women were below federal MeHg exposure limits. Our models suggested 1 serving of Lake Trout per week poses minimal risk of exceeding MeHg intake guidelines. However, to meet essential fatty acids (EFA) intake recommendations, our BRQ analysis suggests Lake Trout should be consumed alongside fish with higher EFA and lower MeHg. Our interdisciplinary analysis suggests CSKT’s natural resource management strategy is likely a key factor in influencing MeHg accumulation in the Flathead Lake food web and subsequent transfer to people.

Montana↗

Stream health shows indirect and threshold responses to implementation of agricultural conservation practices

Many agricultural conservation practices (hereafter conservation practices) are intended to protect streams from the deleterious effects of agriculture, but desired effects of their implementation are not always realized. Understanding the pathways through which conservation practices influence stream health can guide future implementation. Our goal was to quantify how conservation practices influence stream health in pastureland watersheds. We asked 4 research questions: R1) What are the effects of land use and conservation practices on instream conditions? R2) What are the effects of instream conditions on biota? R3) What are the relative effects of land use, conservation practices, and instream conditions on biota? R4) How do conservation practice density (no./ha) and agricultural land use interact to influence stream health? We collected data on water quality (total suspended solids, total N, total P, and Escherichia coli bacteria), instream habitat (substrate embeddedness and bank stability), and macroinvertebrate communities from 31 sites in the upper Tennessee River basin of southwest Virginia, USA. The sites collectively represented spatial analytical gradients of agricultural land use and density of conservation practices, with the dominant practices including prescribed grazing, brush management, and fencing. We found that conservation practice implementation was indirectly related to biotic assemblages through changes in water quality and habitat, but practice density in the study area was not associated with instream conditions that supported biotic communities representative of reference conditions. Further improving instream habitat conditions may require innovative conservation practices, targeted placement of practices in critical source areas of pollutants, or higher densities of practices.

Virginia↗

Predicting reach-scale macroinvertebrate community changes due to declining flows in an aridland river

Understanding the connection between streamflow and macroinvertebrate community structure is critical for managing river ecosystems under scenarios of change caused by human activities and drought. Streamflow influences physical habitat characteristics, including depth, water velocity, and substrate composition, which structure macroinvertebrate communities. Although strong empirical evidence has linked macroinvertebrates to these variables, most studies are correlative, and predictive approaches that link altered streamflow to changes in habitat availability and community structure remain limited. To address this gap, we coupled benthic macroinvertebrate surveys with reach-scale, 2-dimensional hydraulic models to quantify changes in community structure in response to altered streamflows. We characterized macroinvertebrate communities and physical habitat conditions in riffle, run, and pool mesohabitats across 3 reaches of a free-flowing section of the Verde River (Arizona, USA) over 3 y and developed hydraulic models using overflight data, ground surveys, and streamflow monitoring. Macroinvertebrate communities differed among mesohabitats, with riffles supporting higher macroinvertebrate densities and pools exhibiting higher taxonomic richness. The 2-dimensional hydraulic models indicated that declining streamflows could reduce the area of suitable habitat in riffles and runs relative to pools, potentially shifting the distribution of mesohabitats and altering community composition. These changes may lead to declines in overall macroinvertebrate diversity and abundance under reduced flow conditions. By explicitly linking streamflow to habitat availability and community structure, this study demonstrates how integrating hydraulic modeling with biological surveys can improve predictions of ecological response to flow alteration. This framework provides a basis for flow management strategies aimed at maintaining habitat heterogeneity and supporting biodiversity in river networks.

Arizona↗