Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70256527

Evaluating effectiveness of restoration to address current stressors to riverine fish

Jane S. Rogosch·Hadley I. A. Boehm·Ralph W. Tingley·Kiah D. Wright·Elisabeth B. Webb·Craig P. Paukert
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

River restoration programmes with the goal of conserving and rehabilitating inland fishes have a multi-decadal history, but evaluation and synthesis of past restoration actions have been limited by a lack of monitoring and reporting. Given that calls for both monitoring and systematic reviews of restoration have increased, we were interested in the influence that restoration has had on improving conditions for riverine fishes resulting from long-standing and increasingly prominent stressors. Our objectives were to (1) identify which stressors were targeted in river restoration efforts, (2) determine the proportion of published studies that articulate restoration goals and develop comparative monitoring designs for assessing the effects of restoration on fishes, and (3) conduct a meta-analysis to synthesise fish responses to restoration projects. We assessed restoration effectiveness for increasing fish density and richness from peer-reviewed papers published over the past decade using a global systematic review and meta-analysis. We found that restoration actions addressed major stressors primarily by improving in-stream habitat (37%), increasing in-stream longitudinal connectivity (26%) and increasing lateral floodplain connections (9%). Although 81% of studies had comparative monitoring designs (i.e., before/after and control/impact) and stated restoration goals, only 40% of those studies reported sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. Projects which increased in-stream connectivity had the largest positive effect size on fish density and richness compared to in-stream habitat improvements and increasing floodplain connections. Time since restoration and restoration size (i.e., geographical footprint) were not strong predictors of fish response effect sizes. Restoration effectiveness was highly variable among project types. Authors of studies included in the meta-analysis often identified spatial or temporal scale of monitoring, overriding catchment conditions, and recolonisation potential as sources of variability and effectiveness in restoration outcomes. Systematic reporting of these and other covariates may help guide processes in restoration evaluation and provide valuable research insights. Despite increased emphasis on monitoring, incomplete data reporting limited the number of studies that could be included for quantitative meta-analysis. Persistent emphasis on setting specific criteria (e.g., measurable outcomes of fish response) for restoration goals, project monitoring, data reporting, information sharing and collaborative projects is likely to continue to improve understanding of restoration effectiveness transferable to future endeavours. Our results can be used to support river restoration practitioners with evidence-based information to evaluate the cost–benefit ratio of competing restoration priorities, and inform restoration planning and implementation for riverine fish.

Explore related subjects

Freshwater BiologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jane S. Rogosch, Hadley I. A. Boehm, Ralph W. Tingley, Kiah D. Wright, Elisabeth B. Webb, Craig P. Paukert. 2024-03-06. Evaluating effectiveness of restoration to address current stressors to riverine fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14232

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Growth of a threatened desert fish becomes resource dependent when released from temperature limitation in a regulated river

1. Growth of ectotherms typically positively correlates with increasing temperature towards an optimal temperature range, followed by a decline in growth when temperatures exceed the optimal temperature range for that organism. When temperature is within or close to the optimal range, food availability and other environmental factors can play important roles in modifying growth rates. River regulation often alters both environmental conditions (e.g., flow, turbidity and temperature) and aquatic food webs, modifying the quality and quantity of resources available to consumers. Here we aim to understand how food availability, water temperature and other environmental factors are associated with fish growth (defined here as a change in length) in a large, regulated desert river. 2. We measured growth of humpback chub (Gila cypha) at two river reaches located 240 km apart in the Colorado River within the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. We then fit Bayesian state-space models of growth that account for variable time at large to test environmental predictors such as water temperature, flow, turbidity (which increases during tributary flooding and can be a proxy for allochthonous inputs) and gross primary productivity (a proxy for autochthonous food) using an inclusion parameter approach. Both river reaches are located below Glen Canyon Dam, which regulates flow, alters seasonal water temperatures and traps sediment, nutrients, and organic carbon; however, merging tributaries and a greater distance from the dam lead to differences in environmental conditions. 3. In the upriver reach, where warm season water temperatures are below the optimal range for humpback chub most of the time, temperature was the primary driver of variation in growth according to inclusion parameter values and the strength of the standardised effect size. Turbidity was also included in the final model for the upper reach, but the inclusion parameter values and standardised effect size were smaller than for temperature. In the downriver, warmer reach, temperature still had the highest inclusion parameter value, but GPP had the highest standardised effect and nearly as high an inclusion parameter value. 4. We conclude that temperature is the primary limiting factor on growth of humpback chub in the Grand Canyon; however, as water temperatures increase, other factors, especially GPP, are associated with temporal variation in growth rates. Over the past two decades, declines in reservoir elevations and the volume of summer releases have increased downstream water temperatures. If warm temperatures persist into the future, other factors may have increasing roles in regulating interannual variability in chub growth. 5. Field studies of ectotherm growth often emphasise the role of water temperature; however, the role of resource availability is also increasingly recognised, especially in bioenergetics studies. Quantifying resource availability directly can be difficult, especially in large, remote rivers. Here, we show here that using proxies for resource availability (i.e., GPP as a proxy for autochthonous inputs) can yield useful insights regarding resource limitations with implications for management of federally listed fish species in a larger regulated river system.

Arizona↗
USGS2026

Seasonal environmental conditions and river morphology shape summer phytoplankton communities

1. Phytoplankton form the base of large river food webs but there are limited studies on the nature and drivers of communities over longer time scales. Further, climate change is projected to favor taxa associated with harmful algal blooms, but our knowledge of the timing, locations, and drivers of cyanobacteria in rivers lags that of lakes and marine environments. 2. We used a summer phytoplankton community dataset collected from 2010-2020 across main channel, side channel and backwater areas in the La Grange reach of the Illinois River to assess: 1) How much do summer phytoplankton communities across diverse aquatic areas within a large river vary from year to year?, 2) What environmental conditions are associated with that variation?, and 3) Do cyanobacteria respond differently than the full phytoplankton community? 3. We found greater differences in phytoplankton communities across years than among aquatic areas. Further, we showed that annual variation in phytoplankton communities was synchronous among taxa in the same aquatic area, rather than specific to each taxonomic group or taxa-area combination. After accounting for this spatial variation in annual dynamics, phytoplankton reflected river conditions across seasons, responding positively to summer total phosphorus and invasive carp abundance and negatively to winter discharge and spring silica to nitrogen ratio. Annual variation in cyanobacteria was similarly distinct among main channel, side channel and backwater areas but was best explained by the ratio of summer air temperature to discharge, representing conditions that favored growth over transport. 4. These results show that annual variation in summer phytoplankton and cyanobacterial communities both reflected the spatial diversity of the river landscape and responded to conditions that occurred at different spatial and temporal scales. Further, in this highly modified river basin, we showed that a mix of anthropogenic pressures including eutrophication, invasive species, and potential changes to winter and spring conditions affected the phytoplankton communities present in the summer. Thus, when evaluating long-term change and the potential for harmful algal blooms in rivers it is important to consider spatial diversity of phytoplankton communities, how their sensitivity to environmental change may vary across the river landscape, and the suite of human modifications acting on those communities.

Illinois↗
USGS2025

Potential thiamine deficiency of phytoplankton across a productivity gradient and seasons in Ohio lakes

Although nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency of algal blooms have been the focus of substantial attention, organic nutrients can limit algal growth in aquatic systems. Growing evidence indicates thiamine (vitamin B 1 ) can influence the community of primary producers in marine systems, but comparatively little is known about the effect of thiamine on freshwater algal productivity. We conducted 106 nutrient deficiency experiments with water from 39 Ohio lakes of varying trophic status during the growing seasons (April–October) of 2008–2009. Specifically, we tested the response of phytoplankton biomass (as chlorophyll a , chl- a ) relative to controls to added nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), thiamine (Th), or combinations of N + P and N + P + Th. Next, we compared the chl- a growth response of treatment/control to published thresholds based on frequentist approaches and compared the conclusions with Bayesian model results that focused on probability of a response. Although N + P addition was consistently associated with the largest chl- a response, we found evidence of a thiamine influence on phytoplankton growth in some experiments. The Bayesian approach suggested thiamine may become more limiting as the growing season progresses. By late in the growing season, there was an 85% probability of a positive algal growth response to thiamine addition. Understanding the role of thiamine or other overlooked nutrients is not likely to alter the prevailing understanding of nutrient deficiency in freshwater ecosystems. However, we present evidence that freshwater phytoplankton may experience thiamine deficiency and suggest limnologists consider thiamine when exploring resource deficiencies.

Ohio↗