Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70254335

Deep learning for water quality

Abstract

Understanding and predicting the quality of inland waters are challenging, particularly in the context of intensifying climate extremes expected in the future. These challenges arise partly due to complex processes that regulate water quality, and arduous and expensive data collection that exacerbate the issue of data scarcity. Traditional process-based and statistical models often fall short in predicting water quality. In this Review, we posit that deep learning represents an underutilized yet promising approach that can unravel intricate structures and relationships in high-dimensional data. We demonstrate that deep learning methods can help address data scarcity by filling temporal and spatial gaps and aid in formulating and testing hypotheses via identifying influential drivers of water quality. This Review highlights the strengths and limitations of deep learning methods relative to traditional approaches, and underscores its potential as an emerging and indispensable approach in overcoming challenges and discovering new knowledge in water-quality sciences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wei Zhi, Alison P. Appling, Heather E. Golden, Joel Podgorski, Li Li. 2024-03-12. Deep learning for water quality. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00202-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Multiple lines of evidence reveal rapid, seasonal watershed responses to enhanced weathering

Enhanced weathering accelerates carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere through the rapid dissolution of land amendments of crushed, cation-rich rocks. The export of enhanced weathering dissolution products to drainage networks has important implications for carbon dioxide removal durability and measurement yet has received little attention. Here we observe rapid and pronounced streamwater chemistry responses within weeks of a crushed basalt application to a temperate headwater catchment: alkalinity exceeded counterfactual estimates by as much as 557 μeq l −1 , accompanied by changes in silica, lithium and major-ion chemistry consistent with basalt weathering. Difference-in-differences analysis identified repeated treatment effects with enhanced weathering accounting for 7–17% of streamwater alkalinity in successive summers and autumns, but less in winter and spring. This seasonal response reflects a combination of temperature controls on basalt dissolution kinetics and hydrologic controls on weathering-product export. Over 2 years, 9.5–11% of theoretical carbon dioxide removal potential was exported as alkalinity (34.7 t CO 2 km −2 yr −1 ).

Vermont↗