Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70251041

Polar paleoenvironmental perspectives on modern climate change

Laura Gemery·Adrian Lopez-Quiros
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In today’s rapidly changing climate, society needs a better understanding of climate impacts on sea level, ice sheets and glaciers, sea ice, ocean circulation, ecosystems, biodiversity, and other aspects of planet Earth. Paleoenvironmental records provide a unique and invaluable source of insight into these complex issues, and place recent observations into a broader historical context. This essay discusses why paleoclimate reconstructions from polar regions provide critical information to help anticipate possible future climate impacts. By highlighting some key research examples, this essay explains the value of expanding proxy-based research in Arctic/Antarctic regions, and makes a case for paying greater attention to the lessons already distilled from it.

Explore related subjects

PLOS ClimateArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Laura Gemery, Adrian Lopez-Quiros. 2024-01-10. Polar paleoenvironmental perspectives on modern climate change. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000333

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2025

Watershed forest cover and habitat restoration can offset some negative impacts of climate change on freshwater fishes and mussels

Many species of freshwater fishes and freshwater mussels have experienced population declines over the past century due to threats including habitat degradation, overexploitation, species invasion, and climate change. Management actions may offset climate-related changes to biodiversity, although identifying appropriate strategies is challenging. Our goal was to identify the impacts of climate change on freshwater biota (i.e., fish and mussel) distribution and management actions that may offset the climate change impacts across the northeastern United States. We used land use, geography, stream temperature, and streamflow variables to predict species distribution in a baseline scenario, climate change scenario, and several climate change plus land use management scenarios. We found climate change negatively impacted (i.e., reduced the probability of occurrence of) coldwater fishes and reduced the relative occurrence probability of fluvial specialist and coolwater fishes compared to other species. Increasing watershed forest cover best offset these negative impacts and minimized the predicted transition from coldwater fish dominance to warmwater fish dominance in coldwater habitats; however, no intervention fully offset the negative impacts of climate change on vulnerable fish groups (i.e., coldwater and fluvial specialist fishes). Climate change negatively impacted all vulnerable groups of mussels (e.g., lotic species, drying intolerant) and mussel species richness. Combining multiple management interventions (e.g., increase forest cover, dam removal, etc.) had the greatest potential to offset the negative impacts of climate change for freshwater mussels and fishes. This study provides managers a comparison of management interventions across a landscape to combat the impacts of climate change on biota in streams and rivers.

Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, ↗
USGS2025

Autumn as an overlooked opportunity for limnology

Ecological disciplines, from forestry to soil sciences and ornithology, recognize the critical role of autumn in an array of physical and biological processes. Terrestrial studies categorize autumn as the end of the growing season. Autumn weather conditions can disrupt plant-soil interactions, affecting nutrient cycling and soil fertility [1]; determine dormancy and freezing tolerance of trees during winter [2]; and create phenological mismatches that affect diet quality and predator-prey relationships [3]. In many lakes, autumn is marked by an important period of flux within the water column, affecting nutrient cycling, phytoplankton, and fish productivity [4]. Despite their importance, autumnal limnological processes remain understudied.

PLOS Climate↗
USGS2025

The mountains are calling, but will visitors go? Modeling the effect of weather and air quality on visitation to Pacific Northwest parks and protected areas using mobile device data

We investigated how visitors to federal, state, and local parks and protected areas (PPAs) respond to weather and air quality conditions in the Pacific Northwest (PNW), United States. Specifically, we modeled the relationship between weekly visitation and mean weekly minimum and maximum temperature, precipitation, Air Quality Index (AQI), and particulate matter 2.5 concentration (PM2.5, often used as an indicator of wildfire smoke) during an extended peak visitation season from 2017 to 2021 in 91 PNW PPAs. We used mobile device data from StreetLight Data Inc. to estimate weekly vehicular visitation. Our findings indicate that increasing precipitation corresponded with decreased weekly visitation to all three types of PPAs and rising minimum temperatures corresponded with increased visitation. We found that rising maximum temperatures corresponded with increased visitation in federal and local PPAs, but corresponded with decreased visitation in local PPAs once temperatures reach a maximum threshold. We did not observe a maximum threshold effect in federal or state settings. Further, we found that the effect of air quality and smoke on visitation varies based on the metric used: increased PM2.5 concentrations (possibly indicating the presence of wildfire smoke) in federal and local PPAs corresponded with decreased visitation, while increased AQI in federal PPAs corresponded with increased visitation. These findings indicate that visitors may respond differently to different types of air pollution. Our results have implications for adapting peak- and shoulder- season visitor use management to current and future climate change within and beyond PPAs of the PNW.

Idaho, Oregon, Washington↗