Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70244282

Group takes a fresh look at the lithosphere underneath southern Kenya

Abstract

Since the turn of the century the well-developed Kenya rift has been a crucial location for studying the interrelationships between extension, uplift, and magmatism. In 1989–1990, an experiment conducted by the Kenya Rift International Seismic Project (KRISP) focused on the central and northern portions of Kenya (Figure 1) and provided a rich base of information regarding the structure and evolution of the rift, which answered many key questions and raised others. Does the crust thin to the south of the Kenya dome as it does to the north?, and if it does, which crustal layer would be mainly affected? How is the Chyulu Hills Quaternary volcanism related to the rifting process? What is the relationship between the crust and lithospheric mantle during extension?

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: -4.716603697410349° to 1.2109596853965883° latitude; 33.89367854639178° to 41.61694127387926° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

KRISP Working Group, U. Enderle, K. Fuchs, F. Lorenz, O. Novak, C. Prodehl, J. Mechie, C. Birt, M.A. Khan, Peter K.H. Maguire, G. F. Byrne, A.W.B. Jacob, E. Imana, G.R. Keller, D. Roberts, S. Simiyu, James H. Luetgert, Walter D. Mooney, H. Thybo, D. Gajewski, J. Herwanger, R. Vees, A. E. Mussett, E. Dindi, S.J. Gaciri, I.O. Nyambok, J. P. Patel, R. Stangl, H. Macharia, J. Mukinya, J.D. Obel, W. Okoth, D. Riaroh. 2012-12-29. Group takes a fresh look at the lithosphere underneath southern Kenya. https://doi.org/10.1029/eo076i008p00073-01

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Credit where credit is due

Credit is the currency of science. Scientists are evaluated and promoted in their jobs and professional communities on the basis of their recognized contributions to science. Unlike a financial contribution, a scientific contribution is difficult to measure. Traditionally, credit for scientific contributions has been given through authorship and citations in scientific literature as well as awards and the naming of geographic features, instruments, and methods and other honorifics. However, these practices do not capture the breadth and depth of the contributions by all actors in modern, open science.

Eos Science News