Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70232695

What is a stand? Assessing the variability of composition and structure in floodplain forest ecosystems across spatial scales in the Upper Mississippi River

Marcella Windmuller-Campione·Laura F. Reuling·Molly Van Appledorn·Daniel M. Nilesen·Andrew R. Meier
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The forest stand typically represents relatively homogenous forest conditions; the forest stand is generally the unit at which forest attributes are assessed, summarized, and subsequently managed. However, some ecosystems, such as the floodplain forests of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR), can exhibit high variability at fine spatial scales that can confound prescription development, implementation, and ultimate success of stand-level management actions. Here we assess how forest composition and structure vary within and across stand management units on the UMR and test at what spatial scale environmental variables relate to forest characteristics. We found that plot-level measures of composition, structure, and diversity were not well represented by site-level averages of these values. When basal area of all overstory species was combined, this variable was more closely related to “site” than to any of the environmental variables, but when analyzed by species, within-plot topographic variation (“microtopography”) was a significant positive predictor for both importance values of an individual species (swamp white oak ( Quercus bicolor Willd.)) as well as importance value of a specific group of species (oaks (Quercus spp.), bitternut hickory ( Carya cordiformis (Wangenh.) K. Koch), hackberry ( Celtis occidentalis L.), and American basswood ( Tilia americana L.)). This work highlights the challenges of using average stand conditions to summarize complex or heterogeneous systems and the need for flexibility and relaxed assumptions in defining management units in these forests.

Explore related subjects

Forest Ecology and ManagementArticle
90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 42.5530802889558° to 45.69083283645816° latitude; -94.1748046875° to -89.7802734375° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marcella Windmuller-Campione, Laura F. Reuling, Molly Van Appledorn, Daniel M. Nilesen, Andrew R. Meier. 2022. What is a stand? Assessing the variability of composition and structure in floodplain forest ecosystems across spatial scales in the Upper Mississippi River. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120385

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Drought resistance is greater in montane conifers compared to coastal conifers in northern California

Frequent and intense droughts are rapidly altering stand dynamics in western North American forests. The ecological and geographical diversity of northern California provides a unique opportunity to measure these responses across species, habitat types, and levels of competitive pressure. This study used dendrochronological techniques and linear mixed-effects models to assess growth responses to drought in four montane and two coastal conifer species across 54 study sites (nine sites per species, 526 trees total) in northern California. Montane species included Abies magnifica var. shastensis , Picea breweriana , Pinus lambertiana , and Pinus monticola ; coastal species included Picea sitchensis and Tsuga heterophylla . Growth was evaluated from 2002 to 2018 and the drought period was from 2013 to 2015. There were significant differences among species and environments (coastal vs montane) in growth, drought resistance and resilience, and annual latewood proportion. Growth in montane species was generally positively related to moisture availability (Palmer Drought Severity Index) and negatively related to tree competition. The four montane species maintained relatively stable drought resistance, resilience, and latewood proportion across the study period. In contrast, growth in the two coastal species was influenced more by tree size and crown ratio than moisture availability or competition. As the 2013–2015 drought proceeded, coastal species showed marked reductions in drought resistance and resilience and increases in latewood proportion. Across the six conifer species, mean reductions in growth during and after the drought were generally less than 20% and never exceeded 40%. Compared to montane species, the lower resistance measured in coastal species suggests greater risk for increased stress and mortality in the event of more severe, prolonged, and/or frequent droughts.

California↗
USGS2026

Quantifying post-fire live tree presence and spatial variation using Sentinel-2 time series

Accurate mapping of post-fire surviving trees is important for tracking forest recovery and prioritizing land management decisions. Satellite-based remote sensing is an effective method to assess post-fire forest conditions. Traditionally, differenced satellite-derived burn severity indices are computed by differencing one year pre- and post-fire spectral reflectance values. Differenced burn severity indices are useful for quantifying and mapping the magnitude of ecological change, but their application to detecting and mapping post-fire live trees may not be as appropriate, particularly for delayed tree mortality. Delayed tree mortality (“delayed mortality”) is a phenomenon where trees that initially survive fire then die over an extended period (between one and five years), and it can be challenging to measure and predict. In this study, we demonstrate the potential of mapping delayed mortality using readily available remotely sensed imagery alone. We used random forest models to detect post-fire live trees using 10-m resolution Sentinel-2 data at one-, three-, and five-years post-fire for four fires in the southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Using imagery from the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP; 60-cm resolution), we manually classified live tree presence in 6000 Sentinel-2 pixels (500 pixels for each fire-year combination) to calibrate and validate models. Sentinel-2 based model accuracies ranged from 65 % to 86 % with F-scores ranging from 0.52 to 0.86, and their predictions of live pixel area were on average 44 % lower than inferred from more traditional indices such as relative differenced normalized burn ratio (RdNBR). This work represents a promising first step in using freely available post-fire spectral reflectance imagery to detect live trees over an extended period to support post-fire management.

California↗
USGS2026

Evaluating evidence of changing regional occupancy of four bat species in response to forest management practices

Coordinated, regional strategies to guide effective management and conservation of forests can be used to balance conservation with management for other objectives such as timber, scenic viewsheds, and fire. A key part of these regional strategies is incorporating knowledge of how management actions may affect certain species, especially those that are sensitive or are of concern. However, knowledge of how management actions may affect species is inferred from studies conducted across small areas where the species’ behavior and forest conditions are easily assessed. Here, we examine how occupancy of four bat species responds to forest management across the eastern United States at regional scales. We used range-wide capture and stationary acoustic surveys from the North American Bat Monitoring Program from 2010 to 2020 to estimate yearly summer occupancy for four bat species of conservation concern identified in the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS) Southern and Eastern Regions Bat Conservation Strategy: little brown bat ( Myotis lucifugus ), northern long-eared bat ( Myotis septentrionalis ), Indiana bat ( Myotis sodalis ), and tricolored bat ( Perimyotis subflavus ), and assessed the degree to which occupancy of each species changed after different vegetation management actions were implemented on USFS lands. We identified 78 different management actions that were hypothesized to influence summer bat occupancy at two spatial scales (5-km and 10-km) across the eastern United States from the Forest Service Activity Tracking System and grouped these management actions into four vegetation management types: clear-cutting, fire, thinning, and ground vegetation management. To evaluate potential effects of these vegetation management types on bat occupancy, we created a yearly management metric representing the average number of years that had passed since any one of the included management actions in each management type had been implemented in each 5-km or 10-km grid cell, weighted by the proportion of the grid cell covered by the management treatment history. We chose these metrics to ask if more management or management done recently had a larger effect on bat occupancy than less management or management done long-ago. We then fit Bayesian hierarchical multi-scale occupancy models for each species to assess how occupancy changed in response to the amount and time since implementation of each vegetation management type. Using the estimated relationships between the yearly metrics of management and bat occupancy, we created predictions for how bat occupancy responded at 1- and 5- years after implementation. We found substantial differences in the response of the four species to the four vegetation management types. Ground vegetation management provided the greatest increase in expected occupancy at 1 year after implementation for little brown bat, long-eared bat, and tricolored bat, while fire provided the greatest increase in expected occupancy for Indiana bat. Thinning provided increases for all species at 1 year after implementation, but even greater increases at 5 years after implementation. Clear-cutting, on the other hand, tended to result in decreased occupancy at both 1- and 5-years after implementation for each species and had the greatest effect on tricolored bat at 1 year after implementation. Clear evidence for how management types like these may be affecting bat populations can be used at regional scales to help private and public forest managers achieve their strategic goals.

eastern United States↗