Similarities and differences between two deadly Caribbean coral diseases: White plague and stony coral tissue loss disease

Aldo Cróquer; Ernesto Weil; Caroline Rogers

doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.709544

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70227403

Similarities and differences between two deadly Caribbean coral diseases: White plague and stony coral tissue loss disease

Aldo Cróquer·Ernesto Weil·Caroline Rogers

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For several decades, white plagues (WPDs: WPD-I, II and III) and more recently, stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) have significantly impacted Caribbean corals. These diseases are often difficult to separate in the field as they produce similar gross signs. Here we aimed to compare what we know about WPD and SCTLD in terms of: (1) pathology, (2) etiology, and (3) epizootiology. We reviewed over 114 peer-reviewed publications from 1973 to 2021. Overall, WPD and SCTLD resemble each other macroscopically, mainly due to the rapid tissue loss they produce in their hosts, however, SCTLD has a more concise case definition. Multiple-coalescent lesions are often observed in colonies with SCTLD and rarely in WPD. A unique diagnostic sign of SCTLD is the presence of bleached circular areas when SCTLD lesions are first appearing in the colony. The paucity of histopathologic archives for WPDs for multiple species across geographies makes it impossible to tell if WPD is the same as SCTLD. Both diseases alter the coral microbiome. WPD is controversially regarded as a bacterial infection and more recently a viral infection, whereas for SCTLD the etiology has not been identified, but the putative pathogen, likely to be a virus, has not been confirmed yet. Most striking differences between WPD and SCTLD have been related to duration and phases of epizootic events and mortality rates. While both diseases may become highly prevalent on reefs, SCTLD seems to be more persistent even throughout years. Both transmit directly (contact) and horizontally (waterborne), but organism-mediated transmission is only proven for WPD-II. Given the differences and similarities between these diseases, more detailed information is needed for a better comparison. Specifically, it is important to focus on: (1) tagging colonies to look at disease progression and tissue mortality rates, (2) tracking the fate of the epizootic event by looking at initial coral species affected, the features of lesions and how they spread over colonies and to a wider range of hosts, (3) persistence across years, and (4) repetitive sampling to look at changes in the microbiome as the disease progresses. Our review shows that WPDs and SCTLD are the major causes of coral tissue loss recorded in the Caribbean.

Explore related subjects

Frontiers in Marine Science Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Aldo Cróquer, Ernesto Weil, Caroline Rogers. 2021-10-18. Similarities and differences between two deadly Caribbean coral diseases: White plague and stony coral tissue loss disease. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.709544

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Repeated coral bleaching events have eroded reef accretion potential in the Florida Keys

Coral bleaching is now the primary driver of coral-reef degradation globally, threatening the persistence of coral-reef functions and the invaluable ecosystem services they support. The Florida Keys have been impacted by four severe, regional-scale coral-bleaching events, which occurred in 1997–1998, 2005, 2014–2015, and 2023. Our aim in this study was to quantify the effects of those thermal-stress events on the persistence of coral-reef structures. We leveraged long-term coral-reef monitoring data to quantify the impacts of coral bleaching on coral cover, carbonate production, and reef-accretion potential throughout the Florida Keys from 1996–2024. Our study indicates that coral bleaching drove significant declines of reef-building corals, which successively diminished regional-scale reef-accretion potential (from 1.65 ± 0.33 mm y -1 in 1996) and culminated with a regional-scale transition to net reef erosion (-0.12 ± 0.08 mm y -1 ) following the 2023 event. Coral bleaching was the primary driver of declining reef-building capacity, with the cumulative impacts of the four coral-bleaching events accounting for >75% of total declines since 1996. The 1997–1998 event alone drove ~50% of overall declines, largely due to losses of the shallow-water ecosystem engineer, Acropora palmata . More moderate impacts of thermal stress on regional reef-accretion potential in 2005 (6%) and 2014–2015 (9%) could lend some support to the hypothesis that the remaining corals were more thermally tolerant; however, the unprecedented thermal stress event in 2023 caused widespread coral-bleaching and bleaching-related mortality, and caused an additional 12% of the total decline in reef-accretion potential. Stony-coral tissue loss disease accounted for an additional 6% of the decline, with the remaining 19% unexplained. Coral bleaching has already dramatically reshaped the structure and function of coral reefs in the Florida Keys over the last three decades. With the high likelihood that thermal stress will accelerate moving forward, the persistence of Florida’s essential coral-reef functions and services is uncertain.

Florida↗

USGS2026

Fatal leptospirosis in southern sea otters from Central California: Pathologic findings and detection of Leptospira interrogans

Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona infections cause periodic outbreaks in California sea lions (CSLs; Zalophus californianus ) and sporadic deaths in phocids. However, the frequency of infection and associated health impacts remain uncharacterized in sympatric threatened southern sea otters (SSOs; Enhydra lutris nereis ), which serve as important sentinels of coastal health. Given the broad impacts of L. interrogans on other marine mammals, our objective was to screen selected SSOs for infection, determine whether leptospirosis contributes to SSO mortality, and describe leptospiral-associated lesions. A retrospective review (2005–2025) identified 19 candidate cases that underwent detailed review, including Leptospira immunohistochemistry (IHC), serology, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with a special focus on renal and hepatic lesions. Kidney samples were PCR-positive for 74% (14/19) of suspected cases. For eight of these, DNA sequence-based serogroup typing detected L. interrogans serogroup Pomona. Seven of the 14 PCR-positive leptospirosis cases were classified as fatal based on positive renal IHC and moderate to severe tubulointerstitial nephritis. All fatal cases had anti- L. interrogans serovar Pomona antibody titers ≥1:25,600. The remaining seven PCR-positive cases were considered nonfatal leptospirosis due to minimal and/or unrelated renal lesions and negative IHC. Nonfatal Leptospira -infected cases ranged from seronegative to low positive (1:400) for serovar Pomona. Antibody titers for Leptospira PCR-negative cases were negative. In fatal cases, gross renal changes were often inapparent or characterized by miliary white cortical foci. Renal histologic lesions included tubulointerstitial nephritis, acute tubular necrosis, and suppurative tubulitis with intratubular bacteria, along with positive IHC staining for leptospiral antigen in the lesions. Gross hepatic changes were also inapparent in fatal cases, and histologic lesions were rare, characterized in one animal by hepatocellular dissociation and in two sea otters by limited leptospiral antigen detection by IHC. Most Leptospira -infected sea otters (71%, 10/14) stranded during higher rainfall months in California, suggesting possible land-to-sea transmission from terrestrial hosts. Given these findings, and because L. interrogans serovar Pomona infections have been confirmed in sympatric CSLs and terrestrial mammals from adjacent watersheds, a focused investigation of potential marine and terrestrial disease transmission dynamics could provide new information to reduce SSO mortalities.

California↗

USGS2026

Widespread reproductive deficits in Chesapeake Bay ospreys

Introduction: Ospreys ( Pandion haliaetus ) are well-known sentinels of aquatic ecosystem health and are indicators of both environmental contaminants and fish stocks. The Chesapeake Bay supports one of the largest osprey breeding populations in the world, but recent studies have documented declining reproductive performance and increasing food stress in some portions of the estuary. Methods: We monitored osprey nests (N = 571) throughout the Chesapeake Bay during the 2024 breeding season and compared breeding metrics between high-salinity (>10 parts per thousand [ppt]) and low-salinity (<5 ppt) study areas. We also compared contemporary breeding performance within four high-salinity sites to historical data collected during the 1980s. Results: Salinity was strongly associated with breeding performance and the likelihood that pairs achieved productivity levels required for population maintenance. All high-salinity study areas functioned as demographic sinks, whereas low-salinity areas functioned as demographic sources. Breeding metrics including the proportion of pairs breeding, clutch size, nesting failure, brood reduction, and nestling loss all suggested greater food stress within high-salinity areas. Temporal comparisons documented substantial declines in reproductive performance between the 1980s and 2024 within high-salinity study sites. High-salinity sites during the 1980s exhibited breeding performance comparable to low-salinity sites in 2024. Discussion: Although several factors may influence osprey productivity within the Chesapeake Bay, we suggest that reduced availability of Atlantic menhaden ( Brevoortia tyrannus ) is a primary driver of poor reproductive performance within high-salinity waters.

Maryland, Virginia↗