Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70227263

Knowledge sharing for shared success in the decade on ecosystem restoration

Emma Ladouceur·Nancy Shackelford·Karma Bouazza·Lars Brudvig·Anna Bucharova·Timo Conradi·Todd E. Erickson·Magda Garbowski·Kelly Garvy·W. Stanley Harpole·Holly P. Jones·Tiffany Knight·Mlungele M. Nsikani·Gustavo B. Paterno·Katharine Suding·Vicky M. Temperton·Peter Torok·Daniel E. Winkler·Johnathan M. Chase
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Decade on Ecosystem Restoration aims to provide the means and incentives for upscaling restoration efforts worldwide. Although ecosystem restoration is a broad, interdisciplinary concept, effective ecological restoration requires sound ecological knowledge to successfully restore biodiversity and ecosystem services in degraded landscapes. We emphasize the critical role of knowledge and data sharing to inform synthesis for the most robust restoration science possible. Such synthesis is critical for helping restoration ecologists better understand how context affects restoration outcomes, and to increase predictive capacity of restoration actions. This predictive capacity can help to provide better information for evidence-based decision-making, and scale-up approaches to meet ambitious targets for restoration. We advocate for a concerted effort to collate species-level, fine-scale, ecological community data from restoration studies across a wide range of environmental and ecological gradients. Well-articulated associated metadata relevant to experience and social or landscape contexts can further be used to explain outcomes. These data could be carefully curated and made openly available to the restoration community to help to maximize evidence-based knowledge sharing, enable flexible re-use of existing data and support predictive capacity in ecological community responses to restoration actions. We detail how integrated data, analysis and knowledge sharing via synthesis can support shared success in restoration ecology by identifying successful and unsuccessful outcomes across diverse systems and scales. We also discuss potential interdisciplinary solutions and approaches to overcome challenges associated with bringing together subfields of restoration practice. Sharing this knowledge and data openly can directly inform actions and help to improve outcomes for the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.

Explore related subjects

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emma Ladouceur, Nancy Shackelford, Karma Bouazza, Lars Brudvig, Anna Bucharova, Timo Conradi, Todd E. Erickson, Magda Garbowski, Kelly Garvy, W. Stanley Harpole, Holly P. Jones, Tiffany Knight, Mlungele M. Nsikani, Gustavo B. Paterno, Katharine Suding, Vicky M. Temperton, Peter Torok, Daniel E. Winkler, Johnathan M. Chase. 2022-01-03. Knowledge sharing for shared success in the decade on ecosystem restoration. https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12117

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Evaluating seedling traits, maintenance and effective costs to support tropical forest restoration practices

While large-scale restoration is essential, tropical forest restoration often depends on small-scale practitioners and landowners who produce, plant and maintain trees. Their collective impact on restoring forest diversity and function is substantial, making it critical to address the constraints they face through efficient, effective techniques. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate how seedling traits, weeding maintenance and a fertilizer application influenced the 5-year survival of 1796 seedlings from 11 tree species planted in Monteverde, Costa Rica. Estimates of annual survival increased with seedling age (time after planting) and leaf count at planting. Weeding effects varied by species, improving survival in 7 of 10 species and reducing survival in one. All species reached >80% annual survival after 2 years regardless of maintenance, and seedlings planted with ≥25 leaves showed increased survival that decreased the need for weeding. Weeding is costly: all effective costs per 4-year surviving seedlings were higher with weeding than without and varied by species. Costs were calculated by species, treatment and seedling leaf counts when planted (5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 45). Beyond the 2-year threshold, where mortality is highest, weeding effort and costs no longer appear justified. A single fertilizer application did not improve survival in either of the species tested. Practical implications . These findings support landowner restoration by giving restoration technicians accessible tools to improve seedling survival—increasing leaf counts before planting—and reducing post-planting weeding costs by targeting only species for which it benefits and limiting weeding to 2 years.

Los Llanos, Monteverde↗
USGS2026

Survey protocols drive heterogeneity in occupancy estimates that cannot be standardized using post hoc analyses

Site occupancy models are widely used to estimate species distributions from presence–nondetection data, yet for mobile animals, the true proportion of sites occupied varies in time. Thus, true occupancy and estimates generated from different protocols are affected by temporal characteristics of survey design. Here we tested whether we could standardize occupancy estimates across different sampling protocols with a post hoc statistical test. Using an individual-based movement model of Wood Thrush ( Hylocichla mustelina ), we simulated point count surveys across 3000 populations under 90 spatially and temporally variable sampling protocols. For each simulation, we fit a standard occupancy model, then used minute-level detections to truncate surveys and generate occupancy estimates across increasing survey lengths. We fit asymptotic models to these series to estimate intercepts (instantaneous occupancy) and asymptotes (longer-term occupancy) and evaluated how well they approximated true instantaneous, daily and seasonal occupancy. We were unable to recover instantaneous or seasonal occupancy from any approach. Both standard occupancy models and asymptotic regression (the top-performing asymptotic model) most closely approximated daily occupancy; although asymptotic regression produced slightly less biased estimates, it showed substantially greater variability, resulting in greater overall error. Our results show that post hoc analytical approaches cannot, at present, reliably standardize occupancy estimates across heterogeneous survey designs. Instead, ensuring biologically informative and comparable estimates will depend on standardized survey protocols. Practical implication : Monitoring programs using presence–nondetection data should prioritize consistent survey protocols when estimating occupancy for mobile species, with a focus on daily occupancy as the most attainable and useful metric. Although the highest accuracy and precision were achieved under the most intensive survey protocols, for point counts of Wood Thrush and similar species, four consecutive 15–20 min surveys provide near-optimal precision and can be completed in a single visit, making them well suited for estimating relative occupancy under logistical constraints. Three 20-min surveys spaced ~24 h apart closely approximate daily occupancy while maintaining reasonable precision. Developing similar protocols for other species and survey methods will be critical to ensuring comparable occupancy estimates across space and time.

Ecological Solutions and Evidence↗
USGS2026

Exploring management options for moose at their southern range limits considering growing disease risk

1. Populations of cold-adapted species are increasingly vulnerable along their low-latitude range limits due to shifting environmental conditions, biotic interactions, and anthropogenic pressures. Managing these populations is particularly challenging because of complex ecological dynamics, conflicting stakeholder interests, and decision-making under uncertainty. 2. We explored population growth (λ) of moose ( Alces alces ) under different hypothetical management scenarios, simulating combinations of five hypothetical harvest levels with three levels of disease impact. 3. Facing current disease, the population could support multiple levels of conservative harvest. Under elevated levels of disease-caused mortality, projections indicated declines for all harvest scenarios. We projected increases across all harvest scenarios when overlap with white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) was hypothetically reduced and disease mortality in moose minimized. We investigated whether uncertainty in moose demographic parameters altered population trajectory, and found changes in adult fecundity and calf survival could alter harvest decisions when λ<1. 4. Practical implication . While moose population trajectories may remain stable under current conditions, management of white-tailed deer that reduces moose exposure to lethal parasites may provide the greatest utility in sustaining moose in New York given the potential for increased disease. Continued monitoring of population size, growth, and disease prevalence would inform sustainable moose harvest levels that balance social and ecological management considerations.

New York↗