Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70218796

Using decision science for monitoring threatened western snowy plovers to inform recovery

Abstract

Western Snowy Plovers ( Charadrius nivosus nivosus ) are federally listed under the US Endangered Species Act as Threatened. They occur along the US Pacific coastline and are threatened by habitat loss and destruction and excessive levels of predation and human disturbance. Populations have been monitored since the 1970s for distribution, reproduction, and survival. Since the species was federally listed in 1993 and a recovery plan was approved under the US Fish and Wildlife Service in 2007, recovery actions have resulted in growing populations with increased presence at breeding and wintering sites throughout their Pacific Coast range. This success has created logistical challenges related to monitoring a recovering species and a need for identifying and instituting the best monitoring approach given recovery goals, budgets, and the likelihood of monitoring success. We devised and implemented a structured decision analysis to evaluate nine alternative monitoring strategies. The analysis included inviting plover biologists involved in monitoring to score each strategy according to a suite of performance measures. Using multi-attribute utility theory, we combined scores across the performance measures for each monitoring strategy, and applied weighted utility values to show the implications of tradeoffs and find optimal decisions. We evaluated four scenarios for weighting the monitoring objectives and how risk attitude affects optimal decisions. This resulted in identifying six strategies that best meet recovery needs and were Pareto optimal for cost-effective monitoring. Results were presented to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, responsible for monitoring as well as for consideration to ensure consistent monitoring methods across the species’ range. Our use of structured decision-making can be applied to cases of other species once imperiled but now on the road to recovery.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 32.32427558887655° to 48.80686346108517° latitude; -125.595703125° to -115.48828125000001° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bruce G. Marcot, James E. Lyons, Daniel C Elbert, Laura Todd. 2021-02-22. Using decision science for monitoring threatened western snowy plovers to inform recovery. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020569

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Exploratory ecology of reintroduced elk in Virginia

Reintroductions of extirpated species are an important tool in wildlife conservation. Understanding how reintroduced populations acclimatize to novel environments can lend insight into social learning that in turn is valuable for assessing reintroduction success and maximizing efficacy of subsequent efforts. During 2012, 2013, and 2014, the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources implemented soft releases of elk ( Cervus canadensis ) translocated to southwestern Virginia from eastern Kentucky. We investigated home range establishment and post-release movements of these reintroduced elk ( n = 60). We found adults moved farther from the release site than either yearlings or calves (F = 6.93, p = 0.001). Elk released in 2012 and 2013 took similar amounts of time to establish home ranges (median 181 days, range 108–214 days; and median 189 days, range 147–209 days, respectively), but individuals released in 2013 remained closer to the release site ( 𝑥 ̲ = 605.5 m, SD = 335.7 m, closer) presumably by joining established social groups. However, the 2014 cohort generally took longer to establish home ranges (median: 231 days; range: 56–258 days) and moved farthest from the release site ( 𝑥 ̲ = 1360.2 m, SD = 293.9 m, farther than 2012 individuals) possibly due to the larger cohort size and resulting intraspecific competition, or the earlier release date that year. Our findings suggest the number of consecutively released cohorts, the timing of the release, and the composition of age classes for released individuals are important considerations for reintroductions.

Virginia↗

Movement ecology and disease exposure in free-roaming donkeys in California, USA

Feral donkeys ( Equus asinus ) are well adapted to arid ecosystems and are found in large populations in the deserts of Australia and the Americas. We assessed resource selection and seasonal home range size of female donkeys in southern California between 2020 and 2022 based on telemetry data. We also examined whether dyads with greater encounter rates were more likely to test positive for asinine herpesvirus 5 (AHV-5) and/or Streptococcus equi zooepidemicus (SEZ). Donkey home ranges were non-significantly larger in the cool/wet season (November through March; mean 318.37 ± sd 417.65 km 2 ) than in the hot/dry season (April through October; mean 159.35 ± 212.43 km 2 ). Donkeys selected flatter areas closer to water year-round but selected greater herbaceous cover during the cool/wet season and lower heat loads during the hot/dry season. Individuals testing positive for SEZ selected lower elevations during the wet season and closer distances to water during the dry season; donkeys testing positive for AHV-5 selected areas farther from water during the wet season and steeper slopes during the dry season. The dyad encounter rate was unrelated to presence of either disease. Our results contribute to the understanding of donkey ecology, allowing feral populations to be better controlled by specific and focused management.

California↗

Multiscale resource selection for a reintroduced elk population

Patterns of resource selection are driven by the decision-making processes of animals occurring at multiple scales from where to establish a home range (i.e., second order selection) to which resource patches to use within the home range (i.e., third order selection). Elk ( Cervus canadensis ) were reintroduced to southwestern Virginia, USA, from 2012 to 2014 following successful translocations onto reclaimed surface coal mines in the region. We sought to understand how elk have acclimated following their translocation using location data from GPS-collared adult female elk ( n = 33) collected from 2019 to 2022 along with remotely sensed terrain and land cover data. We utilized continuous-time movement models paired with generalized linear mixed-effects modeling to describe seasonal resource selection at second and third orders. At both scales of selection and throughout the year, female elk selected reclaimed surface mines, conifer forests, ridgetops, and areas with lower terrain roughness, while avoiding mixed hardwood and oak ( Quercus spp.) forests. Unmined open land was only selected at the third order during periods of forage scarcity (i.e., winter) and increased metabolic requirements (i.e., late gestation). Although surface coal mining leaves legacy environmental impacts on the landscape, management of these sites provides benefits to elk and maintains open habitat that is otherwise limited.

Virginia↗