Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70212534

Tectono-magmatic evolution of porphyry belts in the central Tethys region of Turkey, the Caucasus, Iran, western Pakistan, and southern Afghanistan

Abstract

Exploration in the central Tethys region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, and weste rn Pakistan has led to the identification of the giant Reko Diq (24 Mt Cu and 1300 t Au), Sar Cheshmeh (8.9 Mt Cu and 0.46 Mt Mo), Sungun (5.1 Mt Cu and 0.20 Mt Mo), and Kadjaran (4.6 Mt Cu, 0.94 Mt Mo, and 1100 t Au), and 10 other large (1–2 Mt Cu) porphyry deposits including Saindak, Cevizlidere, Teghout, Meiduk, and Halilağa. Continued exploration efforts have also resulted in the development of porphyry-related gold deposits such as Kişladağ (9.6 Moz Au), Çöpler (3.7 Moz Au), Aği Daği (1.7 Moz Au), and Sary Gunay (3.0 Moz Au), and in the generation of several other promising exploration projects. The distribution in space and time of porphyry deposits in the central Tethys region was shaped by complex pre- to post-mineral tectonic, igneous, collisional, uplift and burial events. These events are represented by a partially-overlapping and variably exhumed and covered collage of twenty-six Early Jurassic to Holocene magmatic belts permissive for the occurrence of porphyry deposits (porphyry tracts and sub-tracts). Twelve tracts or sub-tracts are characterized by compressional continental arcs that formed on drifting terranes or continental margins, 10 developed in compressional to extensional intra-oceanic arc and backarc-rift settings, and 4 formed in extensional post-collisional environments over amalgamated terranes. Eight of these belts were variably affected by coeval and younger metamorphic, fold-and-thrust, and extensional faulting events. Fifty-four porphyry Au-(Cu), Cu-Au, Cu-Mo, Mo-Cu deposits, 15 porphyry-related Au, Au-(Mo) and W-(Mo-Au) deposits, 239 porphyry prospects, and 68 other porphyry-related mineral sites were identified in the study region. Of the 376 porphyry and porphyry-related sites, about 11% formed in island arc, 42% in continental arc, 20% in backarc, and 27% in post-collisional settings. Of the 69 porphyry and porphyry-related deposits, 7% developed in intra-oceanic arc, 41% in continental arc, 27% in backarc, and 25% in post-collisional settings. The largest occur in either compressional continental arc (18 deposits including the Reko Diq and Sar Cheshmeh giants) or post-collisional (13 deposits including the Kadjaran and Sungun giants) environments. Ninety percent of the largest porphyry or porphyry-related deposits occur in only 9 of the 26 permissive porphyry tracts or sub-tracts. Moreover, 88, 90, and 77% of the identified Cu, Mo, and Au resources are contained in porphyry deposits that occur in only 4 of these 9 tracts. Of these 4 tracts, 3 outline arc settings, and one delimits a post-collisional environment. The compositional diversity of porphyry intrusions in these tectono-magmatic environments generally varies from island arc settings with the most restricted range (partly alkaline but mainly calc-alkaline dioritic to granodioritic-tonalitic), to continental arc (calc-alkaline dioritic-quartz dioritic, granodioritic, quartz monzonitic-granitic, and less commonly mildly alkaline), to backarc (mildly alkaline and calc-alkaline dioritic to granitic), to post-collisional settings with the most expansive range (alkaline and calc-alkaline mafic to felsic, and weakly peraluminous). Metal associations also vary broadly as a function of porphyry intrusion composition from weakly peraluminous to metaluminous felsic (Mo[±W ± Cu]; <2% of porphyry-related systems [i.e., Tyrnyauz]), to metaluminous felsic and intermediate (Cu-Mo[±Au]; 85% [i.e., Cevizlidere, Haft Cheshmeh, Kahang, Sar Cheshmeh, Sungun, Teghout, Reko Diq, Saindak]), to mildly alkaline felsic and intermediate (Cu-Au[±Mo] [i.e., Agarak, Kadjaran, Kale Kafi]) and mafic (Au-Cu; 12% [i.e., Çöpler]), and to alkaline felsic (Au-Mo; 1% of porphyry-related systems [i.e., Kişladağ). Tectonic changes were critical in triggering the formation of large porphyry deposits in the region. Large porphyry deposits were preferentially emplaced in continental arc settings shortly before major collisional events (Dar Alu, Kahang, Meiduk, Now Chun, and the giant Sar Cheshmeh and Reko Diq deposits), or in post-subduction environments shortly after collision (Bakirçay, Güzelyayla, Haft Cheshmeh, Masjed Daghi, and the giant Kadjaran and Sungun deposits) or during periods of prominent extension (Aği Daği, Halilağa, Kişladağ, Sari Gunay, and Zarshuran porphyry-related deposits). Collision-induced uplift, erosion, and removal of coeval volcanic rocks favorably exposed the hypabyssal level of subduction-related porphyry deposits. Extensional structures that developed parallel and orthogonal to the compressional principal stress component along transtensional or transpressional strike-slip faults or in pull-apart basins commonly controlled porphyry-related deposits in post-collisional settings. The latter deposits typically exhibit shallow epithermal levels of emplacement because of preservation by burial. Seventeen porphyry deposits and one porphyry-related deposit in the study region are reported to contain significant supergene resources. Relatively mature levels of secondary copper enrichment in dominantly granodioritic to granitic porphyry deposits occur in areas where large pyrite-rich quartz-sericite alteration zones have been preserved and exposed to surface oxidation (Güzelyayla and Ulutaş in northeastern Turkey; Agarak, Ankavan, Dastakert, Kadjaran, and Teghout in Armenia; Ali Javad in northern Iran; Kale Kafi in central Iran; Darreh Zar, Meiduk, Now Chun, and Sar Cheshmeh in southeastern Iran; and Tanjeel in southwestern Pakistan). Chalcocite blankets also developed over porphyry deposits in regions where significant post-mineral faulting has occurred (Muratdere and Sarıçayıryayla in western Turkey). Normal faulting also enhanced secondary enrichment of gold in the Halilağa porphyry and Sary Gunay porphyry-related deposits located respectively in western Turkey and northern Iran. Evaluation of provincial as well as local controls strongly suggests that continued exploration in the region will lead to the identification of additional porphyry and porphyry-related deposits. These deposits will likely be found under younger cover formations in porphyry belts that are already known, and in association with superjacent high- and intermediate-sulfidation epithermal deposits, or increasingly peripheral skarn, carbonate-replacement, and sediment-hosted deposits. Application of suitable exploration techniques to detect concealed and/or deformed deposits in porphyry belts that remain under-explored may also prove productive.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 25.085598897064752° to 42.13082130188811° latitude; 25.839843749999996° to 63.28125° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lukas Zurcher, Arthur A. Bookstrom, Jane M. Hammarstrom, John C. Mars, Stephen Ludington, Michael L. Zientek, Pamela Dunlap, John Wallis. 2019. Tectono-magmatic evolution of porphyry belts in the central Tethys region of Turkey, the Caucasus, Iran, western Pakistan, and southern Afghanistan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.02.034

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Global pegmatite-hosted lithium, cesium, and rubidium resources: A dataset for grade and tonnage modeling

Quantitative mineral resource assessments of potential undiscovered deposits can inform future mineral supply scenarios, but their accuracy is conditional on building robust grade and tonnage models of known deposits. This study presents an up-to-date global compilation and analysis of recently discovered and original, in-situ pegmatite-hosted Li, Cs, and Rb resources prior to historic production. Our analysis yields a median tonnage of 21.2 million tons (Mt) and grade of 1.12% Li 2 O, respectively, for global Li pegmatite deposits ( n = 73). The grades and tonnages of Li pegmatite resources vary depending on the age of the bedrock host domain, pegmatite crystallization age, and primary ore mineralogy. Lithium pegmatite resources hosted in Archean to transitional Archean-Paleoproterozoic domains have the largest median tonnage (29.8 Mt; n = 38), and those hosted in Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic domains have smaller median tonnages (6.5 Mt; n = 16). Cesium deposits where pollucite is the primary ore mineral have a bimodal grade distribution, with modes of 2.40 and 0.035 wt% Cs 2 O for high- and low-grade deposits, respectively, while Rb deposits are more unimodal with a median grade of 0.247 wt% Rb 2 O. Pegmatite-hosted Cs and Rb resources have median tonnages of 7.6 and 6.3 Mt, respectively. Covariation between ore mineralogy and the degree of crustal enrichment in pegmatite-hosted deposits is diagnostic of petrogenetic differences, including melt source characteristics, magma evolution, or variable degrees of volatile solubility. The Li pegmatite compilation is suitable for fitting robust numerical models to support quantitative assessments. More well-defined Rb and Cs pegmatite resources are required for quantitative assessments, but these data provide useful information about original in-place resources for framing supply discussions.

Ore Geology Reviews

Geochemical, mineralogical, and isotopic evidence for multi-stage genesis of the Hicks Dome REE + Y-HFSE-fluorite deposit, Illinois, USA

Hicks Dome hosts breccias enriched in rare earth elements (REE), Y, Th, F, Ba, Ti, Nb, and Be, alongside spatially associated lamprophyre dikes (ca. 271 Ma). Hicks Dome is located within the Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District, which hosts fluorite, Pb–Zn, and barite resources. This study investigates the genetic relationships between Hicks Dome mineralization in breccias, alkaline magmatism, and Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District mineralization. Lamprophyre dikes are light REE–enriched with chondrite-normalized abundances decreasing from La to Lu. The Host Breccia exhibits middle and heavy REE–enriched patterns that mirror those of the principal REE–Th host minerals, including fluorapatite, xenotime, and thorite. Textural evidence suggests recrystallization of phosphates, sulfates, and Ti–Nb oxides in the Host Breccia. U–Pb geochronology constrains multiple mineralizing events, with ages of 277 ± 18 Ma from low-Th apatite interpreted as main-stage mineralization, and 121.6 ± 9.7 Ma from high-Th apatite indicating later overprinting. O–H–C stable isotope data provide evidence for multiple stages of fluid-rock interaction and fluid mixing: (1) early magmatic fluids dissolved limestone country rock, (2) mixing between magmatic fluids and basinal brines led to main-stage mineralization in the Host Breccia, and (3) late-stage mineralization occurred following mixing of meteoric water and basinal brine. These results indicate that heavy REEs, high field strength elements, and fluorine precipitated proximal to its alkaline magmatic source because of fluid–rock interactions and fluid mixing. Subsequent fluid mixing drove late-stage recrystallization and additional fluorite formation, a process that may be similar to mineralization in the Illinois-Kentucky Fluorspar District.

Illinois

Solution-collapse breccia pipe uranium deposits of the southern Colorado Plateau, northwestern Arizona, USA

Some of the highest-grade uranium deposits in the United States occur in breccia pipes that formed by solution and collapse of sedimentary strata, which occur in the southern portion of the Colorado Plateau in northwestern Arizona. The host breccia pipes are up to 1200 m in vertical extent, average about 90 m in diameter, and can cross-cut strata from their base in the Mississippian Redwall Limestone to as stratigraphically high on some plateaus as the Triassic Chinle Formation. These uranium-base metal deposits are up to 600 m thick and formed within the breccia pipes where they transect the Permian Coconino Sandstone, Hermit Formation, and the Esplanade Sandstone. Of the hundreds of breccia pipes identified across this region, only a small percentage are known to contain mineralization. The main uranium ore mineral is uraninite that is intergrown with at least 20 base-metal sulfide minerals, which contribute Fe, Cu, Co, As, Pb, Zn, Ni, and Ag to the deposits. This study considered regional stratigraphy, sulfur isotope systematics, mineralogy, in situ dating, and compilation and analysis of previous work on the deposits. A comprehensive deposit model has not been published for these deposits. This analysis identified new additions to update the deposit model for these unusual, possibly unique deposits. Proposed modifications to the model include: (1) the source, mechanisms, timing of the base-metal sulfide mineral assemblages, and (2) the source, mechanism, and timing of the uranium mineralization. Sulfide and uranium deposition are shown to be separate mineralization events. The study proposes the possible role of gypsum as a source of sulfur for the sulfide minerals in the deposits. Groundwaters carrying uranium encountered the preexisting sulfides in breccia pipes, reducing the uranyl ions, and precipitating U oxide (as uraninite). Analysis of the regional stratigraphy recognized that numerous beds of gypsum are in the strata that lie only tens of meters above the breccia pipe deposits. In the breccia pipe region, if these stratigraphic units (Toroweap and Kaibab Formations) do not contain gypsum layers then the underlying pipes are not mineralized; where these Permian gypsum layers do occur, breccia pipes can host mineralization. This new understanding should be useful in identifying the prospective region for mineralized pipes.

Arizona