Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70211930

Contact metamorphism adjacent to a teschenite intrusion

Abstract

Shale adjacent to the upper contact of an annular teschenite intrusion was converted to andalusite hornfels in an aureole 2–4 feet wide. At some points along the contact there is no evidence of anhydrous recrystallization. Rarely, magmatic reaction with small shale xenoliths resulted in formation of cordierite‐sillimanite (?) hornfelses, and locally a very small‐scale movement of magmatic constituents took place across the contact before consolidation of the teschenite. Very severe deuteric alteration of teschenite adjacent to the contact resulted in large losses of Si, Fe, Mg, alkalis, and probably Ca, some of which were recombined in clays and carbonates in the more porous shales and in joints, but analyses of uniformly fine‐grained shales indicate little change in bulk composition. Mineralogical evidence indicates a maximum contact temperature within the range 500°‐600° C, and a maximum intrusion temperature within the range 1000°‐1200° C.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Howard G. Wilshire. 1958. Contact metamorphism adjacent to a teschenite intrusion. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167615808728492

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

U-Th-Pb systematics of some granitoids from the northeastern Yilgarn Block, Western Australia and implications for uranium source rock potential

The Mount Boreas‐type granite and spatially associated syenitic granitoid of Western Australia yield Pb‐Pb ages of 2370 ± 100 Ma and 2760 ± 210 Ma, respectively. Th‐Pb ages, although less precise, are concordant with these ages, and therefore the apparent ages are interpreted to be the crystallisation ages for these two units. U‐Pb ages are variable and for the most part anomalously old, which suggests a Cainozoic uranium loss. However, this loss is generally small (< 3 μ g/g); therefore, neither granitoid in its fresh state provides a good source for nearby calcrete‐hosted uranium deposits. The possibility remains that the Mount Boreas‐type granite that has been completely weathered during the Tertiary could have been a source for the calcrete‐type uranium deposits in W.A. Although the Mount Boreas‐type granite is highly fractionated, it does not bear a strong geochemical imprint of a sedimentary precursor. This feature contrasts it with apparently fresh granitoids from other parts of the world that have lost large amounts of uranium (∼ 20 μ g/g ) and are associated with large roll‐type and other low temperature‐type uranium deposits.

Journal of the Geological Society of Australia