Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70211228

Site response in the Oklahoma region from seismic recordings of the 2011 Mw 5.7 Prague earthquake

Abstract

We invert the shear-wave displacement spectra obtained from 30 three-component, broadband waveforms recorded within 300 km of the 6 November 2011 Mw 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma earthquake to recover the site-response contribution using an inversion method that simultaneously inverts for source, path, and site effects. Site-response functions identify resonant frequencies within a range of 0.1-10 Hz that generally coincide with spectral peaks in H/V curves derived from the recorded waveforms. S-wave velocity profiles available for several sites were also used to calculate theoretical SH transfer functions that predict the site amplification due to the near-surface soil structure down to depths of 30-50 m. These transfer functions are generally flat below about 8 Hz in the frequency range sampled by the spectral inversion process, indicating that the spectral peaks in the site response obtained from the waveform analysis result from deeper velocity variations. A 0.3-Hz spectral peak observed at several stations, for example, coincides with the strong, surface-wave amplitudes observed at 3s periods for induced M ≥ 3 earthquakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, suggesting that this resonant peak may be due to surface waves trapped in the upper sedimentary layer of the crust. Both shallow and deep contributions to the site response are important for the characterization of ground motion from Central and Eastern North America (CENA) earthquakes. We obtain a seismic moment of 4.32 × 1024 dyne-cm and a corner frequency of 0.229, consistent with the magnitude of the event. A frequency-dependent attenuation relation of Q(f)=1107f 0.398 consistent with prior measurements of path properties in CENA is also derived.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 35.22094130403182° to 35.70414710206052° latitude; -96.99554443359375° to -96.328125° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C. Mendoza, Stephen H. Hartzell. 2019-08-21. Site response in the Oklahoma region from seismic recordings of the 2011 Mw 5.7 Prague earthquake. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180388

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Digitizer Suite: The Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory Digitizer Testing Suite

Laboratory testing of digitizers and seismometers helps ensure that prior to deployment the instrumentation can produce high quality data and is operating within specifications. In this work we detail the software package called: the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory (ASL) Digitizer Test Suite. This Java software package provides several algorithms to verify various performance parameters of digitizers commonly used for recording analog seismic instruments. The goal of these tests is not to be exhaustive, but to identify common failures that could compromise the integrity of seismic data being recorded on the digitizer. For example, Sandia National Laboratories (e.g., Slad and Merchant, 2018) routinely do comprehensive testing of digitizers for various monitoring missions. While these tests reports are valuable for comprehensively characterizing a recording system, it would be resource intensive to conduct such tests on every seismic recorder used in a network. We focus on tests that include ways to estimate the sensitivity, timing, self-noise, and clip-level of the digitizer, as well as the fidelity of the signal being recorded. The software is publicly available and provides a way for the community to verify the integrity of a digitizer using a minimum amount of outside equipment.

Seismological Research Letters

The digital archivist: Automating legacy macroseismic data processing using large language models

Macroseismic data are a key resource to investigate shaking and damage from preinstrumental and early instrumental eras. However, data are often stored as inconsistently formatted reports describing observed shaking and damage, making manually parsing and interpreting accounts labor‐intensive. We introduce a novel workflow using Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro large language model (LLM) to automate the extraction and structuring of macroseismic observations from summary reports. We apply this workflow to the 22 March 1957 M 5.3 Daly City, California, earthquake as a case study. We used Gemini to extract addresses, originally assigned modified Mercalli intensity values, and descriptions from each report. To address coordinate precision limits, addresses were geocoded via Google’s Geocoding application programming interface. This workflow yielded over 2300 geocoded intensity reports for the Daly City earthquake. We use the geocoded accounts, with the original report intensity assignments, to develop a shaking intensity map that in some respects rivals modern Did You Feel It? Maps. We also extract and present data for the 9 February 1971 M L 6.7 Sylmar, California, earthquake. Our results demonstrate the potential of LLMs for reliably extracting and analyzing large, unstructured macroseismic datasets. LLMs offer a scalable solution for rapidly digitizing macroseismic archives, enabling their broader use to constrain ground‐motion models in modern seismic hazard analysis and to improve our understanding of site effects in urban areas. The concepts explored here may also be applied to the handling of other legacy seismological and earth science data.

Seismological Research Letters