Toward ecosystem accounts for Rwanda: Tracking 25 years of change in potential supply and flows of ecosystem services

Kenneth J. Bagstad; Jane Carter Ingram; Glenn-Marie Lange; Michel K. Masozera; Zachary H. Ancona; Mediatrice Bana; Desire Kabogo; Bernard Musana; Nsharwasi Leon Nabahungu; Emmanuel Rukundo; Evariste Rutebuka; Stephen Polasky; Denis Rugege; Claudine Uwera

doi:10.1002/pan3.10062

USGS · 70208802

Toward ecosystem accounts for Rwanda: Tracking 25 years of change in potential supply and flows of ecosystem services

Kenneth J. Bagstad·Jane Carter Ingram·Glenn-Marie Lange·Michel K. Masozera·Zachary H. Ancona·Mediatrice Bana·Desire Kabogo·Bernard Musana·Nsharwasi Leon Nabahungu·Emmanuel Rukundo·Evariste Rutebuka·Stephen Polasky·Denis Rugege·Claudine Uwera

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

1. Rwanda, a small but rapidly developing central African nation, has undertaken development of natural capital accounts to better inform its economic development through the World Bank’s Wealth Accounting and Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) Partnership. In this paper, we develop ecosystem service (ES) models to quantify the physical supply components of ecosystem accounts in Rwanda from 1990 to 2015. 2. We applied the InVEST carbon storage, sediment delivery ratio, and annual and seasonal water yield models to map changes in potential ES supply nationwide. We also quantified flows of sediment and water to 96 hydroelectric dam, irrigation dam, and water treatment plant sites. 3. Over a 25-year period, we found declines in all ES, which were most strongly driven by conversion of forests to cropland. Declines were most pronounced from 1990 to 2000 and 2010 to 2015; ES were relatively stable from 2000 to 2010. From 2010 to 2015, over 42% of Rwanda’s water-use sites (representing 17% of the nation’s hydroelectric generation capacity and 69% of its water treatment capacity) had increases in sediment export and quick flow greater than the national average. 4. Our results quantify nationwide ES trends, their implications for key water-dependent industries, and the importance of protected areas in safeguarding ES potential supply and flows in Rwanda. They also provide data that can be integrated with existing land, water, and economic accounts for Rwanda, as well as a baseline to inform development strategies that better link economic and environmental goals.

Explore related subjects

People and Nature Article

Source-reported bounding extent: -2.838803632859787° to -1.0491357039128182° latitude; 28.861083984375° to 30.8935546875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kenneth J. Bagstad, Jane Carter Ingram, Glenn-Marie Lange, Michel K. Masozera, Zachary H. Ancona, Mediatrice Bana, Desire Kabogo, Bernard Musana, Nsharwasi Leon Nabahungu, Emmanuel Rukundo, Evariste Rutebuka, Stephen Polasky, Denis Rugege, Claudine Uwera. 2019-12-09. Toward ecosystem accounts for Rwanda: Tracking 25 years of change in potential supply and flows of ecosystem services. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10062

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

The monster in the backyard: A cultural analysis of wolf conflict in the American West

1. Conflict between people and large carnivores remains among the most persistent problems in conservation, threatening carnivore populations and the communities that live alongside them. Decades of technical and financial research and intervention, from livestock protection tools to compensation programs, have not resolved these conflicts. Understanding the persistence of these conflicts and finding novel ways forward require attention to topics these past approaches have not yet considered. 2. We argue that monster theory, most fully developed by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen, offers a helpful analytical framework for understanding this phenomenon. Monsters, in Cohen's formulation, are cultural constructions assembled from collective anxieties that police boundaries of belonging, resist eradication, and stir strong emotional responses. 3. Through a close examination of wolf conflict in the American West, we show that this framework renders legible what empirical approaches to conservation and management often treat as noise, including the intensity of feelings provoked by recovery and the particular fury of communities that understood eradication as settled. We further examine how, in conflicts between people over wolves, communities make monsters of one another. 4. We consider the limits of monster theory in this case, which are also instructive in better understanding the roots of and opportunities for dealing with conflict. We also discuss specific implications for management and science in the American West, as well as the broader implications for carnivore conflicts throughout the world. 5. We conclude that monster theory functions as a “mirror,” offering a potent reflection of local culture, and as a “lamp,” opening narrative possibilities for coexistence that conventional management cannot access.

People and Nature↗

USGS2026

Visioning ecologically diverse and harmonious futures of Korea in Good Anthropocene

1.The Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), a buffer between North and South Korea, holds profound historical, cultural and ecological significance, as well as exceptional potential for conservation and transformation. This study explores ecologically diverse and peaceful futures for the Korean Peninsula by envisioning the DMZ as a landscape for harmonious human–nature co-existence. 2.Using the Nature Futures Framework ( NFF ) and the Seeds of Good Anthropocenes ( SoGA ) approach, we co-developed four ‘Living in Harmony with Nature’ visions that reflect diverse values and meanings of nature for sustainable and well-being oriented futures in Korea. 3.These visions emphasize balancing human activities with ecological integrity, reimagining the DMZ as a space for peace, restoration and shared stewardship. They express citizens' perspectives on aspirational and inclusive futures, highlighting existing initiatives as levers for change and intersectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration as key enabling conditions. 4.This visioning process demonstrates the role of the science-policy-society interface, diverse stakeholder engagement and integration of history, culture and social cohesion. This paper reflects on the lessons from this process and discusses implications for future scenario development—particularly how a whole-of-society approach can help identify policy options and societal transformations that advance nature–people-positive futures in Korea and beyond.

Korean Peninsula↗

USGS2025

National Park Service staff perspectives on how climate change affects visitor use

1. Many public lands, including those managed by the U.S. National Park Service(NPS), have the purpose of conserving natural and cultural resources and providing opportunities for visitors to recreate in and enjoy these areas. Achieving this mission becomes more challenging as drought, flooding, increasing temperatures and other climatic change effects are impacting NPS lands and visitors and affecting factors such as visitation, recreation access and health and safety among other aspects of park operations. 2. However, the literature lacks insights from staff dealing with on-the-ground climate impacts to visitor use. To address this gap, we held semi-structured interviews with 63 staff from 31 NPS units across the United States (U.S.) to better understand the effects of climate change on visitor use. We qualitatively analysed the interviews using both deductive and inductive methods to identify key themes. 3. Interview participants consistently noted that climate change is already affecting visitor use at their parks. For instance, increasing temperatures are negatively affecting both staff and visitor safety at parks nationwide, whereas all coastal parks within our sample are already experiencing impacts from sea-level rise or more frequent and severe coastal storms and hurricanes. Other impacts include reduced recreational access, damaged infrastructure and cultural resources and diminished visitor experiences due to fire and smoke. 4. Similarly, concerns about future impacts often revolved around the health and safety of visitors and staff—particularly related to wildfire and smoke, water quality and availability, and increased heat—and climate change forever altering parks. 5. Our research shows staff in parks and protected areas are noticing effects of climate change on visitor use; some of these impacts have not been previously documented in the scientific literature. Study results highlight future visitor use management research needs and key topics to consider for visitor use planning processes.

People and Nature↗