Monarch butterfly population decline in North America: identifying the threatening processes

Wayne E. Thogmartin; Ruscena Wiederholt; Karen Oberhauser; Ryan G. Drum; Jay E. Diffendorfer; Sonia Altizer; Orley R. Taylor; John M. Pleasants; Darius J. Semmens; Brice X. Semmens; Richard A. Erickson; Kaitlin Libby; Laura Lopez-Hoffman

doi:10.1098/rsos.170760

USGS · 70191329

Monarch butterfly population decline in North America: identifying the threatening processes

Wayne E. Thogmartin·Ruscena Wiederholt·Karen Oberhauser·Ryan G. Drum·Jay E. Diffendorfer·Sonia Altizer·Orley R. Taylor·John M. Pleasants·Darius J. Semmens·Brice X. Semmens·Richard A. Erickson·Kaitlin Libby·Laura Lopez-Hoffman

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) population in North America has sharply declined over the last two decades. Despite rising concern over the monarch butterfly's status, no comprehensive study of the factors driving this decline has been conducted. Using partial least-squares regressions and time-series analysis, we investigated climatic and habitat-related factors influencing monarch population size from 1993 to 2014. Potential threats included climatic factors, habitat loss (milkweed and overwinter forest), disease and agricultural insecticide use (neonicotinoids). While climatic factors, principally breeding season temperature, were important determinants of annual variation in abundance, our results indicated strong negative relationships between population size and habitat loss variables, principally glyphosate use, but also weaker negative effects from the loss of overwinter forest and breeding season use of neonicotinoids. Further declines in population size because of glyphosate application are not expected. Thus, if remaining threats to habitat are mitigated we expect climate-induced stochastic variation of the eastern migratory population of monarch butterfly around a relatively stationary population size.

Explore related subjects

Royal Society Open Science Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Wayne E. Thogmartin, Ruscena Wiederholt, Karen Oberhauser, Ryan G. Drum, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Sonia Altizer, Orley R. Taylor, John M. Pleasants, Darius J. Semmens, Brice X. Semmens, Richard A. Erickson, Kaitlin Libby, Laura Lopez-Hoffman. 2017-09-20. Monarch butterfly population decline in North America: identifying the threatening processes. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170760

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Fish locomotor dynamics quantified using multiple inertial measurement units

Animals exhibit a diversity of locomotor behaviours that vary with body shape, ontogeny, motivation and environment. Documenting these behaviours often relies on recording videos of animals in controlled conditions displaying stereotyped behaviours. By contrast, animal-borne motion sensing data loggers can document diverse behaviours of animals in their natural environment. Traditionally, one data logger is used to infer body dynamics; however, a single location presents an incomplete picture of body movement. Here, we deploy multiple independent inertial measurement units on individual fish to study within-body dynamics and assess the accuracy of this approach compared to traditional video methods. Using a combination of robotic and animal experiments, we accurately measure the timing, direction and magnitude of movement of multiple locations along the body and can recreate accurate three-dimensional midline kinematics without video data. Furthermore, we show that with as few as two data loggers, parameters such as propulsive wavelength can be calculated, even during high-intensity behaviours. Using multiple data loggers has the potential to provide unbiased spatio-temporal estimates of fish kinematics, allowing kinematic studies to be extended to new species, new habitats and a diversity of natural fish locomotor behaviours beyond those traditionally studied in laboratory settings.

Royal Society Open Science↗

USGS2026

Evaluating interactive effects of the Conservation Reserve Program and wind energy infrastructure on grassland bird abundance in the United States

The extent of grasslands has contracted globally, leading to significant declines in grassland-obligate species, including birds. Grassland birds are threatened by multiple factors, including grassland conversion to cropland, and development, including energy infrastructure. In the USA, the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) provides financial incentives for agricultural landowners to convert marginal cropland to vegetative covers, including grassland, making it a key approach to recovering grasslands. However, given the high percentage of wind turbines near Conservation Reserve Program land, it is critical to determine if wind energy and the Conservation Reserve Program interact to affect grassland birds. We used generalized additive models and community science eBird data to assess the interactive effects of wind and the Conservation Reserve Program on the abundances of 27 grassland-obligate bird species across their breeding ranges in the continental US. We found associations between bird relative abundances and interactions involving wind and Conservation Reserve Program variables, suggesting that wind energy development near Conservation Reserve Program fields could dampen the benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for some species. These results indicate that decisions about where to install wind energy infrastructure that incorporate information about the presence of Conservation Reserve Program land may reduce the adverse effects of wind energy on grassland birds. This study provides information that can help maximize the benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program while allowing for environmentally friendly development of renewable energy.

contiguous United States↗

USGS2026

Small cumulative survival costs of enzootic disease could suppress long-term population size

Fungal pathogens can cause epizootics that result in widespread mortality and rapid population declines in some species. However, even in the absence of high disease-induced mortality, enzootic mycoses could have large-scale impacts on host population dynamics. Here, we examined the effects of ophidiomycosis, an enzootic fungal disease, on a Louisiana snake community over a 3-year period using a multi-state Jolly–Seber model with disease-state misclassification. We did not detect a difference between the average weekly apparent survival probability of uninfected and infected hosts for either Nerodia species or Thamnophis proximus . We also found a strong positive association between snout-to-vent length and weekly apparent survival probability across all species. We found that recruitment of infected hosts was slightly higher than recruitment of uninfected hosts for two of the three species. Population projections suggested divergent trajectories between disease-present and disease-absent scenarios, where disease-absent populations had higher abundance than disease-present populations. Our results highlight that small differences in survival can accumulate over time, as well as the challenges of quantifying population-level impacts of enzootic diseases when survival differences are not readily detected, underscoring the importance of continued long-term monitoring to assess whether ophidiomycosis affects snake population dynamics.

Louisiana↗