Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70189577

Effect of NOAA satellite orbital drift on AVHRR-derived phenological metrics

Lei Ji·Jesslyn F. Brown
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center routinely produces and distributes a remote sensing phenology (RSP) dataset derived from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) 1-km data compiled from a series of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellites (NOAA-11, −14, −16, −17, −18, and −19). Each NOAA satellite experienced orbital drift during its duty period, which influenced the AVHRR reflectance measurements. To understand the effect of the orbital drift on the AVHRR-derived RSP dataset, we analyzed the impact of solar zenith angle (SZA) on the RSP metrics in the conterminous United States (CONUS). The AVHRR weekly composites were used to calculate the growing-season median SZA at the pixel level for each year from 1989 to 2014. The results showed that the SZA increased towards the end of each NOAA satellite mission with the highest increasing rate occurring during NOAA-11 (1989–1994) and NOAA-14 (1995–2000) missions. The growing-season median SZA values (44°–60°) in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1999, and 2000 were substantially higher than those in other years (28°–40°). The high SZA in those years caused negative trends in the SZA time series, that were statistically significant (at α = 0.05 level) in 76.9% of the CONUS area. A pixel-based temporal correlation analysis showed that the phenological metrics and SZA were significantly correlated (at α = 0.05 level) in 4.1–20.4% of the CONUS area. After excluding the 5 years with high SZA (>40°) from the analysis, the temporal SZA trend was largely reduced, significantly affecting less than 2% of the study area. Additionally, significant correlation between the phenological metrics and SZA was observed in less than 7% of the study area. Our study concluded that the NOAA satellite orbital drift increased SZA, and in turn, influenced the phenological metrics. Elimination of the years with high median SZA reduced the influence of orbital drift on the RSP time series.

Explore related subjects

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lei Ji, Jesslyn F. Brown. 2017. Effect of NOAA satellite orbital drift on AVHRR-derived phenological metrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.06.013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Satellite embeddings for crop type classification: A comparative examination

Embedding datasets encode complex relationships among multiple sources of Earth observation data into a compact format. Here, we evaluated the utility of a 10-m global Satellite Embedding product (SE) for classifying crop types in central California for the year 2020. We compared the classification accuracy of a random forest model based exclusively on the SE layer to an existing random forest model with multiple imagery inputs. Our results showed the SE-based classification had higher agreement with the reference dataset (California Department of Water Resources crop map) than the classification based on Landsat and National Agricultural Imagery Program inputs (94.7% versus. 91.9% overall accuracy, respectively). The performance of individual crop types was consistent across models, ranging from high agreement for rice (98.4% versus 98% accuracy) to lower agreement for pasture, grain, and fallow/young perennial classes (< 65% accuracy in both models). The SE-based workflow used three times less cloud-based computational resources and represented substantial savings of predictor development time. Geospatial embedding products can aid classification efforts by reducing predictor development time and processing demands while maintaining classification accuracy.

California↗
USGS2026

The impacts of cover crop biomass on satellite-based detectability of cover crops in Maryland

Cover crop adoption in the U.S. has increased over the past decades, increasing the need to quantify their performance and environmental benefits. While remote sensing (RS)-based approaches for detecting cover crop presence have been developed, there has been limited research on how cover crops with varied biomass and management practices influence detectability. Using unique field-level cover crop presence and biomass datasets in Maryland, U.S., we investigated how RS-based detectability changes for cover crops with varied aboveground biomass, planting, and termination dates. Specifically, we proposed a time-integrated satellite-based greenness feature from Harmonized Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 (HLS) time series from 2017 to 2021 to estimate biomass of cover crops and evaluated their detectability using a phenology-based cover crop detection framework. The impacts of cover crop planting and termination dates on cover crop biomass were also analyzed. Our results demonstrated that Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) estimated biomass with higher accuracy compared to other vegetation indices, and the time-integrated model estimated biomass with higher accuracy than the single-date “snapshot” linear model (R2 from 0.53 to 0.66 and RMSE from 922 kg/ha to 747 kg/ha). While the snapshot models were species sensitive, the time-integrated models showed strong robustness across different species. Detectability increased with cover crop biomass, as detected cover crops averaged 963.3 ±719.5 kg/ha compared to 297.2 ± 209.0 kg/ha for non-detected cover crops. Detection accuracy reached 96.1% for fields exceeding 500 kg/ha, compared with an overall accuracy of 62.7%. Earlier planting and later termination increased biomass and detectability, with biomass rising by 4.14 kg/ha/day (p < 0.01). This study demonstrates how management practices affect cover crop biomass and detectability via satellite time series and provides insights that can inform management of cover crops and monitoring of their effects on agroecosystems.

Maryland↗
USGS2026

Aligning legacy NLCD land cover maps based on Landsat Collection 1 to Collection 2

The transition from Landsat Collection 1 to Collection 2 introduced significant improvements in radiometric and geometric accuracy. However, the improvements cause location misalignment between the existing Landsat-derived land cover products and the new collection. The legacy National Land Cover Database (NLCD) has been used as a cornerstone land cover source for a variety of research. Therefore, a method aligning the legacy NLCD product to Collection 2 is required to ensure its continuity and consistency of service. We developed a strategy to not only align legacy NLCD to match new Collection 2 geometric locations but also improve land cover labeling in the region that was affected by the geometric shifts. The method identifies boundary pixels of homogeneous land cover patches as potential problem areas that are likely impacted by geometric shifts and generates candidate labels from 3 × 3 window with the target pixel at the center and segmentation-derived majority label. Standard phenology patterns of each candidate land cover type are established based on the random samples except boundary pixels within a 1000-pixels × 1000-pixels processing window region. The phenological distance to each standard land cover type pattern is calculated through a penalty dynamic time warping (DTW) method for each target pixel in the boundary region. Finally, the method determines the most suitable label based on the phenological distance from the candidate labels. Both visual and accuracy assessment results demonstrate that the alignment preserves the overall land cover patterns in the original legacy NLCD product while reducing the spatial discrepancies between the Landsat Collection 2 and land cover. In addition, it enhances the accuracy of land cover labeling of boundary pixels. The overall accuracy (OA) was increased by 7% in the land cover boundary regions after alignment. The quality and confusion matrix comparison between the alignment results and the original legacy NLCD confirm the reliability of the method. Our alignment method has the potential to serve as a framework for aligning other Landsat-derived land cover products to future collections.

conterminous United States↗