Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70179460

Chemical composition of ground water, hydrologic properties of basin-fill material, and ground-water movement in Salt Lake Valley, Utah

Abstract

The chemical composition and movement of ground water and hydrologic properties of the basin‑fill material were studied to better under‑ stand the flow system in Salt Lake Valley, Utah. Recharge sources and water‑rock interactions influence the water chemistry in the principal and shallow unconfined aquifers. Chloride concentration in water from some wells has increased from the 1950’s and 1960’s to 1992, possibly because of the infiltration of water that contains dissolved road salt and the movement of ground water with relatively high chloride concentrations from volcanic rocks in the vicinity of these wells. Hydraulic‑conductivity values determined from slug tests done on wells finished in the shallow unconfined aquifer and confining layers ranged from 0.003 to 33.4 feet per day. Transmissivity values determined for the principal aquifer from four multiple‑well aquifer tests ranged from 6,400 to 43,600 feet squared per day. Vertical hydraulic‑conductivity values estimated from these tests are from 0.01 to 1 foot per day. Water from 81 sites was analyzed for the stable‑isotope ratios of oxygen and hydrogen to determine sources of recharge and mixing of water from these sources. Water sampled from the principal aquifer in the southeastern part of the valley is isotopically similar to water in Big and Little Cottonwood Creeks. Ground water sampled from the shallow unconfined aquifer is generally enriched in oxygen‑18 and deuterium relative to other water in the valley, except for water from the Jordan River and its diversions, which are probable recharge sources. Tritium concentrations ranging from about 33 to 59 tritium units in water from the principal aquifer in the southeastern part of the valley are representative of concentrations in water that was recharged in the 1960’s.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 40.4149° to 40.9201° latitude; -112.2611° to -111.5497° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Susan A. Thiros. 1995. Chemical composition of ground water, hydrologic properties of basin-fill material, and ground-water movement in Salt Lake Valley, Utah. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70179460

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Hydrology and simulation of ground-water flow in Kamas Valley, Summit County, Utah

Kamas Valley, Utah, is located about 50 miles east of Salt Lake City and is undergoing residential development. The increasing number of wells and septic systems raised concerns of water managers and prompted this hydrologic study. About 350,000 acre-feet per year of surface water flows through Kamas Valley in the Weber River, Beaver Creek, and Provo River, which originate in the Uinta Mountains east of the study area. The ground-water system in this area consists of water in unconsolidated deposits and consolidated rock; water budgets indicate very little interaction between consolidated rock and unconsolidated deposits. Most recharge to consolidated rock occurs at higher altitudes in the mountains and discharges to streams and springs upgradient of Kamas Valley. About 38,000 acre-feet per year of water flows through the unconsolidated deposits in Kamas Valley. Most recharge is from irrigation and seepage from major streams; most discharge is to Beaver Creek in the middle part of the valley. Long-term water-level fluctuations range from about 3 to 17 feet. Seasonal fluctuations exceed 50 feet. Transmissivity varies over four orders of magnitude in both the unconsolidated deposits and consolidated rock and is typically 1,000 to 10,000 feet squared per day in unconsolidated deposits and 100 feet squared per day in consolidated rock as determined from specific capacity. Water samples collected from wells, streams, and springs had nitrate plus nitrite concentrations (as N) substantially less than 10 mg/L. Total and fecal coliform bacteria were detected in some surface-water samples and probably originate from livestock. Septic systems do not appear to be degrading water quality. A numerical ground-water flow model developed to test the conceptual understanding of the ground-water system adequately simulates water levels and flow in the unconsolidated deposits. Analyses of model fit and sensitivity were used to refine the conceptual and numerical models.

Utah