Mercury-contaminated hydraulic mining debris in San Francisco Bay

Robin M. Bouse; Christopher C. Fuller; Samuel N. Luoma; Michelle I. Hornberger; Bruce E. Jaffe; Richard E. Smith

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70156310

Mercury-contaminated hydraulic mining debris in San Francisco Bay

Robin M. Bouse·Christopher C. Fuller·Samuel N. Luoma·Michelle I. Hornberger·Bruce E. Jaffe·Richard E. Smith

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The hydraulic gold-mining process used during the California Gold Rush and in many developing countries today contributes enormous amounts of sediment to rivers and streams. Commonly, accompanying this sediment are contaminants such as elemental mercury and cyanide used in the gold extraction process. We show that some of the mercurycontaminated sediment created by hydraulic gold mining in the Sierra Nevada, between 1852 and 1884, ended up over 250 kilometers (km) away in San Francisco Bay; an example of the far-reaching extent of contamination from such activities. A combination of radionuclide dating, bathymetric reconstruction, and geochemical tracers were used to distinguish the hydraulic mining sediment from sediment deposited in the bay before hydraulic mining started (pre-Gold Rush sediment) and sediment deposited after hydraulic mining stopped (modern sediment). Three San Francisco Bay cores were studied as well as source material from the abandoned hydraulic gold mines and river sediment between the mines and bay. Isotopic and geochemical compositions of the core sediments show a geochemical shift in sediment deposited during the time of hydraulic mining. The geochemical shift is characterized by a decrease in εNd, total organic carbon (TOC), Sr and Ca concentrations, Ca/Sr, and Ni/Zr; and, an increase in 87Sr/86Sr, Al/Ca, Hg concentrations, and quartz/plagioclase. This shift is in the direction of the geochemical signature of sediments from rivers and gold mines in hydraulic mining areas. Mixing calculations using Nd isotopes and concentrations estimate that the hydraulic mining debris comprises up to 56% of the sediment in core sediments deposited during the time of hydraulic mining. The surface sediment of cores taken in 1990 were found to contain up to 43% hydraulic mining debris, reflecting a continuing remobilization and redistribution of the debris within the bay and transport from the watershed. Mercury concentrations in pre-Gold Rush sediment range between 0.03 and 0.08 μg g-1. In core sediments that have characteristics of the gold deposits and were deposited during the time of hydraulic mining, mercury concentrations can be up to 0.45 μg/g. Modern sediment (post-1952 deposition) contains mercury concentrations up to 0.79 μg/g and is likely a mix of hydraulic mining mercury and mercury introduced from other sources.

Explore related subjects

San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 36.910372213522535° to 39.838068180000015° latitude; -123.804931640625° to -120.50354003906249° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Robin M. Bouse, Christopher C. Fuller, Samuel N. Luoma, Michelle I. Hornberger, Bruce E. Jaffe, Richard E. Smith. 2010. Mercury-contaminated hydraulic mining debris in San Francisco Bay. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70156310

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Assessment of Chinook Salmon smolt survival at offsite release locations in the Sacramento River across wet and dry years

We used acoustic telemetry to estimate survival of tagged release groups, and quantify differences between alternative hatchery release strategies. To assess whether offsite release could increase survival of hatchery fish relative to those released at the hatchery, we compare survival during emigration of hatchery fall Chinook Salmon (FCS, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) smolts released onsite, at Coleman National Fish Hatchery (NFH), to those released at alternative offsite locations downstream in the upper Sacramento River, California. Approximately 300 fish in each release group were implanted with acoustic tags in the 3-year study during 2019, 2021, and 2022. Environmental conditions in the emigration corridor varied between study years, with extended high flows in 2019, whereas drought conditions and a flat hydrograph occurred in 2021 and 2022. Survival across years appeared to reflect environmental conditions, with higher overall survival seen in 2019. Survival differences between release sites generally showed higher cumulative survival to Knights Landing or Chipps Island for the downstream release groups, compared to the onsite releases during 2021 and 2022. This information suggests hatchery releases of FCS from Coleman NFH at downstream release sites may benefit emigration survival during years of drought and sub-optimal in-river conditions, compared to standard onsite releases. Hatchery managers can use information from this study to diversify the portfolio of release strategies, which may be useful to buffer against extreme variations of adult abundance by spreading risks across space and time. Ultimately, offsite releases may be a useful tool for adaptive management of these culturally, ecologically, and economically important salmon populations.

California↗

USGS2026

Differences among runs of Chinook Salmon in routing probability at the Georgiana Slough-Sacramento River junction

The survival of juvenile Chinook Salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) depends on the specific migration route they take through the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. Factors such as flow magnitude, flow direction, and distribution of fish across the channel significantly affect the likelihood of their entering routes with lower survival probabilities. Management strategies to mitigate the entry of endangered winter-run and threatened spring-run Chinook Salmon into the interior Delta—particularly through Georgiana Slough—involve flow regulation and the installation of a bioacoustic fish fence. Monitoring the effectiveness of these measures has primarily relied on acoustically-tagged, juvenile, hatchery-reared, late-fall-run Chinook Salmon, which are easier to obtain and can accommodate larger tags compared to other runs. Previous studies explored how flow dynamics affect routing probabilities of late-fall-run Chinook Salmon, but there is a lack of understanding about how routing probabilities vary among runs. We leveraged data from 15 previous studies comprising 3,004 acoustically-tagged fish across all four runs, over a 12-year period, to assess the effects of run on routing probability into Georgiana Slough, while accounting for variation in flow dynamics. We employed logistic regression to model the influence of tidal flow metrics, time of day (day and night), and run type on the probability of juvenile Chinook Salmon being routed into Georgiana Slough. Our analysis revealed that reverse flow during incoming tides influenced the routing probabilities of all runs. An increased proportion of flow into Georgiana Slough, meant an increased probability for all runs to be routed into Georgiana Slough. Late-fall-run Chinook Salmon also showed a greater probability of routing into Georgiana Slough during the night than during the day, whereas the opposite was true for other runs. These differences in routing probability affect our understanding of how management actions intended to reduce routing into Georgiana Slough may differentially affect the four runs of Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento River.

Callifornia↗

USGS2025

Effects of flow on pesticides in water and zooplankton in the northern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

Zooplankton are a key food source for juvenile fishes in estuaries worldwide, including California’s Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (hereafter Delta); both zooplankton quality and quantity are critical to ecosystem health. Zooplankton may be affected by pesticides in water and the food web, and the Delta is known to contain complex pesticide mixtures. In this study, we evaluated pesticide concentrations in water and zooplankton in the northern Delta during (1) the summer–fall of 2017, 2018, and 2019, which included periods of augmented pulse flows from agriculture tailwater, and (2) across a full seasonal cycle from May 2019 to March 2020. We quantified changes in pesticide concentration in response to environmental factors. We found that zooplankton showed more frequent detections of hydrophobic pesticides compared to more frequent detections of hydrophilic compounds in water. Pesticide concentrations were influenced by flow, pesticide application, and season, but the effects of these environmental factors differed by habitat (Sacramento River or Yolo Bypass Toe Drain). Pesticides in water responded similarly to environmental factors in the Sacramento River and Yolo Bypass, whereas pesticides in zooplankton responded differently. In water, we found more detections and higher concentrations at higher flows in the Yolo Bypass and Sacramento River, but responses to pesticide application varied by habitat. Alternatively, pesticide concentrations in zooplankton increased in the Yolo Bypass with increasing flow (correlated with flow pulses) and changed seasonally; whereas, pesticide concentrations in zooplankton in the Sacramento River decreased at higher flows, and decreased with or did not respond to higher pesticide application in the watershed. Our study suggests that augmented flows—particularly those using agricultural tailwater—may have unintended negative ecological effects that could partially offset benefits to the food web and fishes in the northern Delta, underscoring the complex interplay among factors that drive increased pesticide exposure.

California↗