Editors are editors, not oracles

Dave Schimel; Donald R. Strong; Aaron M. Ellison; Debra P. C. Peters; Sue Silver; Edward A. Johnson; Jayne Belnap; Aimee T. Classen; Timothy E. Essington; Andrew O. Finley; Brian D. Inouye; Emily H. Stanley

doi:10.1890/0012-9623-95.4.342

USGS · 70129169

Editors are editors, not oracles

Dave Schimel·Donald R. Strong·Aaron M. Ellison·Debra P. C. Peters·Sue Silver·Edward A. Johnson·Jayne Belnap·Aimee T. Classen·Timothy E. Essington·Andrew O. Finley·Brian D. Inouye·Emily H. Stanley

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Farji-Brener and Kitzberger (2014; hereafter FBK) resurrect the issues of Farji-Brener (2007) concerning manuscripts that are submitted to journals but that are not sent out for peer review: a process we call “reject following editorial review” (RFER). We thank FBK for reviving discussion about this important topic as new challenges, including new publication outlets, peer-review models, and an increasingly complex and voluminous scientific literature, are emerging across the publication landscape. While we disagree with FBK's perspective and conclusions, we recognize that this discussion can help to improve editorial and publication processes, and we welcome the opportunity to inform the ecological community about the current status of editorial practice at ESA journals.

Explore related subjects

Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Dave Schimel, Donald R. Strong, Aaron M. Ellison, Debra P. C. Peters, Sue Silver, Edward A. Johnson, Jayne Belnap, Aimee T. Classen, Timothy E. Essington, Andrew O. Finley, Brian D. Inouye, Emily H. Stanley. 2014. Editors are editors, not oracles. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-95.4.342

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2023

Suppression of invasive Brown Treesnakes and reintroduction of native avifauna on Guam

Many agencies and interest groups are committed to re-establishing components of Guam's native avifauna through the reintroduction of captive-reared birds or translocation from other islands in the Marianas if the Brown Treesnake ( Boiga irregularis ; BTS) can be eliminated. Island-wide eradication of BTS from Guam continues to appear out of reach, but with recent and future advancement in BTS suppression technology, we may soon reach a point where suppression may enable the reintroduction of some of Guam's extirpated bird species. Our simulations indicate that bird persistence in Guam's forests would only be possible at a suppression level just short of full eradication.

Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America↗

USGS2020

Quantifying drought’s influence on moist soil seed vegetation in California’s Central Valley through remote sensing

Across the Central Valley of California, millions of wintering waterfowl rely on moist soil seed (MSS) plants that grow in managed seasonal wetlands as a critical source of food. Estimates of MSS plant production are used to set waterfowl habitat targets yet this information is not well known. We created the first Central Valley-wide time series maps of MSS plant distributions and productivity. We found that MSS plant seed yield declined in critical drought years, which corresponded with reduced water delivery to managed wetlands. Our results provide improved food resource estimates and information to help managers prioritize actions as water supply becomes more uncertain with climate change.

California↗

USGS2017

Best practices for virtual participation in meetings: Experiences from synthesis centers

The earth environment is a complex system, in which collaborative scientific approaches can provide major benefits by bringing together diverse perspectives, methods, and data, to achieve robust, synthetic understanding (Fig. 1). Face-to-face scientific meetings remain extremely valuable because of the opportunity to build deep mutual trust and understanding, and develop new collaborations and sometimes even lifelong friendships (Alberts 2013, Cooke and Hilton 2015). However, it has been argued that ecologists should be particularly sensitive to the environmental footprint of travel (Fox et al. 2009); such concerns, along with the time demands for travel, particularly for multi-national working groups, provide strong motivation for exploring virtual attendance. While not replacing the richness of face-to-face interactions entirely, it is now feasible to virtually participate in meetings through services that allow video, audio, and file sharing, as well as other Web-enabled communication.

Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America↗