Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70055511

Reply to “Ranking filter methods for concentrating pathogens in lake water”

Rebecca N. Bushon·Donna S. Francy·Vicente J. Gallardo·H.D. Alan Lindquist·Eric N. Villegas·Michael W. Ware
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Accurately comparing filtration methods is indeed difficult. Our method ( 1 ) and the method described by Borchardt et al. for determining recoveries are both acceptable approaches; however, each is designed to achieve a different research goal. Our study was designed to compare recoveries of multiple microorganisms in surface-water samples. Because, in practice, water-matrix effects come into play throughout filtration, concentration, and detection processes, we felt it important to incorporate those effects into the recovery results.

Explore related subjects

Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rebecca N. Bushon, Donna S. Francy, Vicente J. Gallardo, H.D. Alan Lindquist, Eric N. Villegas, Michael W. Ware. 2013. Reply to “Ranking filter methods for concentrating pathogens in lake water”. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01559-13

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Mars sample return campaign: Biological risk and a proposed sample safety assessment protocol

Returning surface samples from Mars to Earth has been a major planetary science objective, with the potential for the detection of microbiological life and the possibility of improving our understanding of the origins of life. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the European Space Agency assembled a team to assess the level of risk that returned samples could contain potential biohazards. The team was chartered with optimizing previous sample safety assessment strategies, defining what constitutes a biological hazard, developing a protocol to test for biohazards, and establishing a statistical framework to determine if samples may be safe for release from a high-containment facility. This report presents the biological context for a proposed three-step protocol for testing returned samples, including how to determine if microorganisms are present, and if they could be (or were recently) alive.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology↗
USGS2025

Comparative assessment of a restored and natural wetland using 13C-DNA SIP reveals a higher potential for methane production in the restored wetland

Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH 4 ), a potent greenhouse gas produced by methanogens. Methanogenesis rates are controlled by environmental factors such as redox potential, temperature, and carbon and electron acceptor availability and are presumably dependent on the composition of the active methanogen community. We collected intact soil cores from a restored and natural freshwater depressional wetland on Maryland’s Delmarva Peninsula (USA) to assess the effects of wetland restoration and redox shifts on microbial processes. Intact soil cores were incubated under either saturated (anoxic) or unsaturated (oxic) conditions and amended with 13 C-acetate for quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) of the 16S rRNA gene. Restored wetland cores supported a distinct community of methanogens compared to natural cores, and acetoclastic methanogens putatively identified in the genus Methanosarcina were among the most abundant taxa in restored anoxic and oxic cores. The active microbial communities in the restored wetland cores were also distinguished by the unique presence of facultatively anaerobic bacteria belonging to the orders Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes . In natural wetland incubations, methanogen populations were not among the most abundant taxa, and these communities were instead distinguished by the unique presence of aerobic bacteria in the phyla Acidobacteria , Actinobacteria , and class Alphaproteobacteria . Iron-reducing bacteria, in the genus Geobacter , were active across all redox conditions in both the restored and the natural cores, except the natural oxic–anoxic condition. These findings suggest an overall higher potential for methanogenesis in the restored wetland site compared to the natural wetland site, even when there is evidence of Fe reduction.

Maryland↗
USGS2024

Quantitative microbial risk assessment for ingestion of antibiotic resistance genes from private wells contaminated by human and livestock fecal sources

We used quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate ingestion risk for intI1 , erm (B), sul1 , tet (A), tet (W), and tet (X) in private wells contaminated by human and/or livestock feces. Genes were quantified with five human-specific and six bovine-specific microbial source-tracking (MST) markers in 138 well-water samples from a rural Wisconsin county. Daily ingestion risk (probability of swallowing ≥1 gene) was based on daily water consumption and a Poisson exposure model. Calculations were stratified by MST source and soil depth over the aquifer where wells were drilled. Relative ingestion risk was estimated using wells with no MST detections and >6.1 m soil depth as a referent category. Daily ingestion risk varied from 0 to 8.8 × 10 −1 by gene and fecal source (i.e., human or bovine). The estimated number of residents ingesting target genes from private wells varied from 910 ( tet (A)) to 1,500 ( intI1 and tet (X)) per day out of 12,000 total. Relative risk of tet (A) ingestion was significantly higher in wells with MST markers detected, including wells with ≤6.1 m soil depth contaminated by bovine markers (2.2 [90% CI: 1.1–4.7]), wells with >6.1 m soil depth contaminated by bovine markers (1.8 [1.002–3.9]), and wells with ≤6.1 m soil depth contaminated by bovine and human markers simultaneously (3.1 [1.7–6.5]). Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were not necessarily present in viable microorganisms, and ingestion is not directly associated with infection. However, results illustrate relative contributions of human and livestock fecal sources to ARG exposure and highlight rural groundwater as a significant point of exposure.

Wisconsin↗