Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70030265

Microhabitat use, home range, and movements of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma

Abstract

Little is known about the ecology of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, particularly dentography and behavior. To learn more about the species in Oklahoma, we conducted a telemetry project on 2 small streams at Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, an 8,417.5-ha refuge located in east-central Oklahoma. Between June 1999 and August 2000, we fitted 19 M. temminckii with ultrasonic telemetry tags and studied turtle movements and microhahitat use. Turtles were checked 2 to 3 times weekly in summer and sporadically in winter. Several microhabitat variables were measured at each turtle location and a random location to help quantify microhabitat use vs. availability. We recorded 147 turtle locations. Turtles were always associated with submerged cover with a high percentage of overhead canopy cover. Turtles used deeper depths in late summer (but not deeper depths than random locations) and deeper depths in mid-winter (and deeper depths than random locations) than in early summer. They used shallower depths than random locations in early summer. This seasonal shift in depth use might be thermoregulatory, although evidence for this is indirect. The mean linear home range for all turtles was 777.8 m. Females had larger home ranges than males, and juveniles had larger home ranges than adults, although the latter was not statistically significant. Macrochelys temminckii used submerged structures as a core site, and stayed at each core site for an average of 12.3 d.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J.D. Riedle, P.A. Shipman, S. F. Fox, David M. Leslie. 2006. Microhabitat use, home range, and movements of the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, in Oklahoma. https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909(2006)51%5B35%3Amuhram%5D2.0.co%3B2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Diurnal habitat selection and survival of elk neonates

Natural selection should favor development of behaviors that increase survival, including juvenile survival. Habitat characteristics (e.g., hiding cover, forage quality and availability), maternal habitat selection, and microhabitat selection by the calf may influence elk ( Cervus canadensis ) calf survival and recruitment. We assessed diurnal microhabitat selection of bed sites by elk calves and calf-rearing areas selected by adult females to determine if these characteristics were associated with calf survival. We radio-tagged 33 elk calves in west-central New Mexico in 2011 and 55 calves in north-central New Mexico in 2012. We tracked calves daily to locate calf bedding sites and collected data on selected physical features and vegetation characteristics at used and paired random sites. The paired differences in these characteristics were then associated with calf fate. At the calf selection scale, for every 1-m difference in the distance to nearest concealment cover, the odds that a site was from a surviving calf increased by 7.8%. Habitat selection by adult females also was associated with calf survival. The odds of a bed site being from a surviving calf increased by 1.9% for every 1% difference in percentage of grass cover. High levels of concealment cover at the bed site were related to calf survival status. When we expanded selection to the adult level, females with surviving calves selected areas with higher grass cover, suggesting adult selection for higher forage availability while still providing high concealment cover for the calf.

Southwestern Naturalist

Analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequence data demonstrates that monophyly of myotis occultus is complicated by greater sampling of myotis lucifugus

The validity of Myotis occultus as a species unique from Myotis lucifugus has been a source of debate. Most recently, many authorities treat M. occultus as a distinct species, at least in part because a previous study showed that M. occultus and M. l. carissima (the subspecies that occurs in closest geographic proximity to M. occultus ) form separate monophyletic clades based on sequences of two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome- b [cytb] and cytochrome oxidase subunit II [COII]). We re-evaluated the phylogenetic relationship between M. occultus and M. lucifugus based on mitochondrial sequences using an expanded dataset of cytb and COII sequences that originated from more genetically diverse specimens of M. lucifugus collected across a broader geographic area. Based on a phylogenetic analysis, we found that M. occultus sublineages embedded within a well-supported clade that included some specimens of M. lucifugus . These results indicate that the previous genetic analysis demonstrating that M. occultus and M. lucifugus form distinct monophyletic groups is unsupported by our larger dataset. Future research will likely need to focus on genetic work involving whole-genome sequencing of nuclear DNA to better resolve the true taxonomic relationship between M. occultus and M. lucifugus . La valides de Myotis occultus como una especie distinta a Myotis lucifugus ha sido fuente de debate. Recientemente, muchas autoridades han considerado M. occultus como una especie diferente, en parte porque un estudio anterior mostró que M. occultus y M. l. carissima (la subespecie con la mayor proximidad geográfica a M. occultus) forman clados monofiléticos separados basados en secuencias de dos genes mitocondriales (el citocromo-b [cytb] y la subunidad II de citocromo oxidasa [COII]). Nosotros hemos reevaluado la relación filogenética entre M. occultus y M. lucifugus usando una ampliada colección de datos que contiene secuencias de los genes mitocondriales cytb y COII de especímenes de M. lucifugus genéticamente más diversos que fueron muestreados en un área geográfica más extensa. Nuestro análisis filogenético muestra que los sublinajes de M. occultus están incrustados dentro de un clado bien respaldado que incluye algunos especímenes de M. lucifugus. Estos resultados indican que el análisis genético anterior que demostró que M. occultus y M. lucifugus forman grupos monofiléticos distintos no está respaldado por nuestra más amplia colección de datos. Es probable que para resolver mejor la verdadera relación taxonómica entre M. occultus y M. lucifugus sea necesario el uso de secuenciación del genoma completo del ADN nuclear.

Southwestern Naturalist

Gulf killifish (Fundulus grandis) in the Pecos River: Unique life history traits in a nonnative, island population

Nonnative species may display unique life history traits when established in habitats with distinctive environmental and biotic contexts compared with their native ecosystems. Gulf killifish ( Fundulus grandis ), native to coastal habitats of the Gulf of Mexico, are established in several inland river systems where they pose a potential threat to native fishes. In the Pecos River, Texas, nonnative Gulf killifish have shown a high rate of piscivory compared with native coastal populations; otherwise, little is known about the ecology of the species in inland systems. We examined reproductive characteristics, size, and age of Gulf killifish in the Pecos River. We found that reproduction takes place approximately between late March and September, with the gonadosomatic index of females showing a large and extended peak in spring and a second minor peak in late August–September. Our age estimations indicate that this population consists mostly of fish <2 years old, similarly to that reported for coastal populations. Total length ranged 11.9–143.4 mm for males and 32.3–162.5 mm for females, indicating a sexually dimorphic size structure with Pecos River individuals reaching larger sizes compared with coastal populations. The relatively large size and piscivorous nature of Gulf killifish, along with tolerance for a wide range of environmental conditions, are attributes in nonnative species hypothesized to promote invasion success and replacement of native species.

New Mexico, Texas